The impact of cognitive communities on the diffusion of academic knowledge: Evidence from the networks of inventors of a French university

Abstract Looking at micro-data on the networks of inventors of a French science university, we investigate whether the kind of cognitive relationships between researchers influences the geography of their collaborations. The hypothesis we test (and confirm empirically) is that academic knowledge diffuses in a restricted geographic area when the connected researchers belong to epistemic communities, whereas communities of practice entail less localised effects. We also show that institutionally mixed research teams do not impede large knowledge diffusion.

[1]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered , 2001 .

[3]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Capturing Technological Opportunity Via Japan's Star Scientists: Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products , 1998 .

[4]  Rachel Levy,et al.  Do academic laboratories correspond to scientific communities? Evidence from a large European university , 2007 .

[5]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Will New Information and Communication Technologies Improve the 'Codification' of Knowledge? , 2000 .

[6]  R. Narula,et al.  Globalisation and trends in international R+D alliances , 2003 .

[7]  Corinne Autant-Bernard,et al.  Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case , 2001 .

[8]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Routines and incentives: the role of communities in the firm , 2003 .

[9]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[10]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[11]  Caroline Hussler,et al.  Innovation in regions: What does really matter? , 2005 .

[12]  Patrick Waelbroeck,et al.  Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data , 2003 .

[13]  Caroline Hussler,et al.  Les réseaux d'innovation des chercheurs universitaires sont-ils géographiquement circonscrits ? , 2005 .

[14]  P. Rondé,et al.  Densité scientifique des régions et compétences pour innover des entreprises : une mise en perspective du concept de « Learning Region » , 2001 .

[15]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[16]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[17]  Frédéric Créplet,et al.  Dualité cognitive et organisationnelle de l`entreprise: le rôle différencié du manager et de l`entrepreneur: le rôle différencié du manager et de l`entrepreneur , 2001 .

[18]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[19]  Laure Turner,et al.  Mesure de l'intensité de collaboration dans la recherche scientifique et évaluation du rôle de la distance géographique , 2004 .

[20]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Networks of Inventors and the Location of University Research: An Exploration of Italian Data , 2002 .

[21]  M. Spence Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[22]  Michel Grossetti,et al.  Proximité spatiale et relations science - industrie : savoirs tacites ou encastrement (Polanyi ou Polanyi) ? , 2002 .

[23]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[24]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[25]  Caroline Hussler,et al.  What kind of individual education for which type of regional innovative competence? An exploration of data on French industries , 2005 .

[26]  H. Li Communicating information in conversations: a cross-cultural comparison☆ , 1999 .

[27]  Martin Fransman,et al.  Information, Knowledge Vision and Theories of the Firm , 1994 .

[28]  André Torre,et al.  Proximité et localisation , 2004 .

[29]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[30]  A. Jaffe Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[31]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[32]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[33]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance , 2003 .

[34]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[35]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[36]  Michael J. Orlando Measuring Spillovers from Industrial R&D: On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity , 2004 .

[37]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[38]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[39]  E. Mansfield Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[40]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[42]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  Organisational Innovation, Communities of Practice and Epistemic Communities: the Case of Linux , 2001 .

[43]  Jean-Alain Heéraud Regional Innovation Systems and European Research Policy: Convergence or Misunderstanding? , 2003 .