Assessment of an Assistive Control Approach Applied in an Active Knee Orthosis Plus Walker for Post-Stroke Gait Rehabilitation

The goal of this study is the assessment of an assistive control approach applied to an active knee orthosis plus a walker for gait rehabilitation. The study evaluates post-stroke patients and healthy subjects (control group) in terms of kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity. Muscle and gait information of interest were acquired from their lower limbs and trunk, and a comparison was conducted between patients and control group. Signals from plantar pressure, gait phase, and knee angle and torque were acquired during gait, which allowed us to verify that the stance control strategy proposed here was efficient at improving the patients’ gaits (comparing their results to the control group), without the necessity of imposing a fixed knee trajectory. An innovative evaluation of trunk muscles related to the maintenance of dynamic postural equilibrium during gait assisted by our active knee orthosis plus walker was also conducted through inertial sensors. An increase in gait cycle (stance phase) was also observed when comparing the results of this study to our previous work. Regarding the kinematics, the maximum knee torque was lower for patients when compared to the control group, which implies that our orthosis did not demand from the patients a knee torque greater than that for healthy subjects. Through surface electromyography (sEMG) analysis, a significant reduction in trunk muscle activation and fatigability, before and during the use of our orthosis by patients, was also observed. This suggest that our orthosis, together with the assistive control approach proposed here, is promising and could be considered to complement post-stroke patient gait rehabilitation.

[1]  Mokhtar Arazpour,et al.  The efficacy of powered orthoses on walking in persons with paraplegia , 2015, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[2]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  A Preliminary Assessment of Legged Mobility Provided by a Lower Limb Exoskeleton for Persons With Paraplegia , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Differences in muscle activity and temporal step parameters between Lokomat guided walking and treadmill walking in post-stroke hemiparetic patients and healthy walkers , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  Jose L Pons,et al.  Powered exoskeletons for bipedal locomotion after spinal cord injury , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Trieu Phat Luu,et al.  Risk management and regulations for lower limb medical exoskeletons: a review , 2017, Medical devices.

[6]  Michael D Lewek,et al.  The relationship between spatiotemporal gait asymmetry and balance in individuals with chronic stroke. , 2014, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[7]  Denis Delisle-Rodriguez,et al.  Control of a robotic knee exoskeleton for assistance and rehabilitation based on motion intention from sEMG , 2018, Research on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  V. Weerdesteyn,et al.  Falls in individuals with stroke. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  Fatigue in neurological disorders , 2004, The Lancet.

[10]  Farzam Farahmand,et al.  The gait and energy efficiency of stance control knee–ankle–foot orthoses: A literature review , 2016, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[11]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  State of the Art and Future Directions for Lower Limb Robotic Exoskeletons , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  Eduardo Rocon,et al.  An IMU-to-Body Alignment Method Applied to Human Gait Analysis , 2016, Sensors.

[14]  Bing Chen,et al.  Recent developments and challenges of lower extremity exoskeletons , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic translation.

[15]  Eduardo Palermo,et al.  Experimental evaluation of accuracy and repeatability of a novel body-to-sensor calibration procedure for inertial sensor-based gait analysis , 2014 .

[16]  W. S. Newman Stability and Performance Limits of Interaction Controllers , 1992 .

[17]  Muhammad Ir,et al.  Stance-Control-Orthoses with Electromechanical Actuation Mechanism: Usefulness, Design Analysis and Directions to Overcome Challenges , 2015 .

[18]  L. Miller,et al.  Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis , 2016, Medical devices.

[19]  F. Tok,et al.  Gait Disturbances in Patients With Stroke , 2014, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[20]  Adriano Ferrari,et al.  ‘Outwalk’: a protocol for clinical gait analysis based on inertial and magnetic sensors , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[21]  Rob den Otter,et al.  The Combined Effects of Body Weight Support and Gait Speed on Gait Related Muscle Activity: A Comparison between Walking in the Lokomat Exoskeleton and Regular Treadmill Walking , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  Romain Meeusen,et al.  Human–Robot Interaction: Kinematics and Muscle Activity Inside a Powered Compliant Knee Exoskeleton , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  I. Schwartz,et al.  Differences in muscle activity and fatigue of the upper limb between Task-Specific training and robot assisted training among individuals post stroke. , 2019, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Della Buttigieg CLINICAL APPLICATION OF NEUROMUSCULAR TECHNIQUES , 2003, Australasian chiropractic and osteopathy.

[25]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Design of a wearable perturbator for human knee impedance estimation during gait , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[26]  B. Zacharias,et al.  Clinical Benefits of Stance Control Orthosis Systems: An Analysis of the Scientific Literature , 2012 .

[27]  Teodiano Freire Bastos Filho,et al.  Knee Impedance Modulation to Control an Active Orthosis Using Insole Sensors , 2017, Sensors.

[28]  Dennis R. Louie,et al.  Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[29]  P. Celnik,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation. , 2015, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[30]  Jason Farquhar,et al.  Decoding Sensorimotor Rhythms during Robotic-Assisted Treadmill Walking for Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Applications , 2015, PloS one.

[31]  Mirko Aach,et al.  Against the odds: what to expect in rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury with a neurologically controlled Hybrid Assistive Limb exoskeleton. A subgroup analysis of 55 patients according to age and lesion level. , 2017, Neurosurgical focus.

[32]  Joseph Mizrahi,et al.  Mechanical Impedance and Its Relations to Motor Control, Limb Dynamics, and Motion Biomechanics , 2015, Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering.

[33]  Jinghui Cao,et al.  Control strategies for effective robot assisted gait rehabilitation: the state of art and future prospects. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[34]  N. Hogan,et al.  Impedance and Interaction Control , 2018 .

[35]  Jose L Pons,et al.  Wearable Robots: Biomechatronic Exoskeletons , 2008 .

[36]  Shahid Hussain,et al.  Adaptive Impedance Control of a Robotic Orthosis for Gait Rehabilitation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[37]  Pieter Coenen,et al.  Robot-assisted walking vs overground walking in stroke patients: an evaluation of muscle activity. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[38]  François Michaud,et al.  Exoskeletons' design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury , 2016, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[39]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.