Translucent OBS network architectures with dedicated and shared wavelength converters

The deployment of translucent optical networks is considered the most promising short term solution to decrease costs and energy consumption in optical backbone networks. Indeed, due to the technological maturity of translucent wavelength switched optical network (WSON) architectures, they have already caught close attention from the research community. Moreover, recent advances and enhancements in optical devices are now (re-)fostering research interest in sub-wavelength technologies like, among others, optical burst switching (OBS) and optical packet switching (OPS). Hence, in this paper, we evaluate and compare two novel node architectures for a translucent OBS (T-OBS) network. To be precise, we study nodes with both dedicated and shared wavelength converter resources (i.e., DWC and SWC). To this end, we consider the impact of the main physical layer impairments (PLIs) and make use of a routing and regenerator placement and dimensioning (RRPD) algorithm to minimize the number of optical-electrical-optical (O/E/O) regenerators deployed in the network whilst, at the same time, guaranteeing a target quality of transmission (QoT) network performance. The results presented prove the feasibility and the significant savings, in terms of the number of wavelength converters (WCs), that can be achieved by considering a network with shared wavelength converter resources.

[1]  Luca Valcarenghi,et al.  Challenges and requirements for introducing impairment-awareness into the management and control planes of ASON/GMPLS WDM networks , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Rodney S. Tucker,et al.  Translucent optical networks: the way forward [Topics in Optical Communications] , 2007, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  R. Martínez,et al.  Experimental Translucent-Oriented Routing for Dynamic Lightpath Provisioning in GMPLS-Enabled Wavelength Switched Optical Networks , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  Josep Solé-Pareta,et al.  RRPD strategies for a T-OBS network architecture , 2011, 2011 IEEE 12th International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing.

[5]  Josep Solé-Pareta,et al.  Modelling and Performance Evaluation of a Translucent OBS Network Architecture , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[6]  Rodney S. Tucker,et al.  Translucent Optical Networks: The Way Forward , 2007 .

[7]  Josep M. Fabrega,et al.  Tuning Characteristics and Switching Speed of a Modulated Grating Y Structure Laser for Wavelength Routed PONs , 2010 .

[8]  Byrav Ramamurthy,et al.  Sparse Regeneration in Translucent Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks: Architecture, Network Design and Wavelength Routing , 2005, Photonic Network Communications.

[9]  Arunabha Sen,et al.  On Sparse Placement of Regenerator Nodes in Translucent Optical Network , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[10]  P. Kokkinos,et al.  Joint Online Routing, Wavelength Assignment and Regenerator Allocation in Translucent Optical Networks , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[11]  Nail Akar,et al.  Shared-per-wavelength asynchronous optical packet switching: A comparative analysis , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[12]  J.P. Heritage,et al.  Transparent vs. opaque vs. translucent wavelength-routed optical networks , 1999, OFC/IOOC . Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 1999, and the International Conference on Integrated Optics and Optical Fiber Communication.

[13]  E. Patzak,et al.  Analysis of the Physical Impairments on Maximum Size and Throughput of SOA-Based Optical Burst Switching Nodes , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[14]  Young Lee,et al.  A Framework for the Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSONs) with Impairments , 2012, RFC.