A 3D printed TCP/HA structure as a new osteoconductive scaffold for vertical bone augmentation.

INTRODUCTION OsteoFlux(®) (OF) is a 3D printed porous block of layered strands of tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and hydroxyapatite. Its porosity and interconnectivity are defined, and it can be readily shaped to conform the bone bed's morphology. We investigated the performance of OF as a scaffold to promote the vertical growth of cortical bone in a sheep calvarial model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six titanium hemispheres were filled with OF, Bio-Oss (particulate bovine bone, BO), or Ceros (particulate TCP, CO) and placed onto the calvaria of 12 adult sheep (6 hemispheres/sheep). Histomorphometric analyses were performed after 8 and 16 weeks. RESULTS OF led to substantial vertical bone growth by 8 weeks and outperformed BO and CO by a factor 2 yielding OF 22% ± 2.1; BO 11.5% ± 1.9; and CO 12.9% ± 2.1 total new bone. 3 mm away from the bony bed, OF led to a fourfold increase in new bone relative to BO and CO (n = 8, P < 0.002). At 16 weeks, OF, BO, and CO behaved similarly and showed marked new bone synthesis. A moderate degradation was observed at 16 weeks for all bone substitutes. CONCLUSION When compared to existing bone substitutes, OF enhances vertical bone growth during the first 2 months after implantation in a sheep calvarial model. The controlled porous structure translated in a high osteoconductivity and resulted in a bone mass 3 mm above the bony bed that was four times greater than that obtained with standard substitutes. These results are promising but must be confirmed in clinical tests.

[1]  M. Esposito,et al.  Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional bloc grafts: bone from the iliac crest vs. bovine anorganic bone. Clinical and histological results up to one year after loading from a randomized-controlled clinical trial. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  A. Neff,et al.  Vertical bone augmentation procedures: basics and techniques in dental implantology. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[3]  K. Ishikawa,et al.  Effects of Sintering Temperature Over 1,300°C on the Physical and Compositional Properties of Porous Hydroxyapatite Foam , 2006 .

[4]  D. Cochran,et al.  Clinical evaluation of Bio-Oss: a bovine-derived xenograft for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. , 1999, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  B. Oesch,et al.  Analysis of the risk of transmitting bovine spongiform encephalopathy through bone grafts derived from bovine bone. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[6]  Arun K Gosain,et al.  A 1-year study of osteoinduction in hydroxyapatite-derived biomaterials in an adult sheep model: part II. Bioengineering implants to optimize bone replacement in reconstruction of cranial defects. , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[8]  M. Bohner,et al.  Assessment of the suitability of a new brushite calcium phosphate cement for cranioplasty - an experimental study in sheep. , 2005, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[9]  H. Seitz,et al.  Three-dimensional printing of porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[10]  P H Krebsbach,et al.  Engineering craniofacial scaffolds. , 2005, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[11]  P. Coulthard,et al.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[12]  R. G. Richards,et al.  Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. , 2007, European cells & materials.

[13]  J. Ramirez-Vick,et al.  Scaffold design for bone regeneration. , 2014, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[14]  G. Daculsi,et al.  Biphasic calcium phosphate concept applied to artificial bone, implant coating and injectable bone substitute. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[15]  S. Ding,et al.  Surface reaction of stoichiometric and calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite in simulated body fluid , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[16]  H. Redl,et al.  Simultaneous in vivo comparison of bone substitutes in a guided bone regeneration model. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[17]  Gross Js,et al.  Bone grafting materials for dental applications: a practical guide. , 1997 .

[18]  J. Fiorellini,et al.  Vertical ridge augmentation by means of deproteinized bovine bone block and recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB: a histologic study in a dog model. , 2006, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[19]  Yutaka Yamada,et al.  Effects of occlusiveness of a titanium cap on bone generation beyond the skeletal envelope in the rabbit calvarium. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  M. Archdeacon,et al.  Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  Koichi Ito,et al.  Angiogenesis in newly augmented bone observed in rabbit calvarium using a titanium cap. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  Michael Wehmöller,et al.  Performance of functionally graded implants of polylactides and calcium phosphate/calcium carbonate in an ovine model for computer assisted craniectomy and cranioplasty. , 2007, Biomaterials.