Cost-Effective Low-Delay Cloud Video Conferencing

The cloud computing paradigm has been advocated in recent video conferencing system design, which exploits the rich on-demand resources spanning multiple geographic regions of a distributed cloud, for better conferencing experience. A typical architectural design in cloud environment is to create video conferencing agents, i.e., Virtual machines, in each cloud site, assign users to the agents, and enable inter-user communication through the agents. Given the diversity of devices and network connectivities of the users, the agents may also transcode the conferencing streams to the best formats and bitrates. In this architecture, two key issues exist on how to effectively assign users to agents and how to identify the best agent to perform a Transco ding task, which are nontrivial due to the following: (1) the existing proximity-based assignment may not be optimal in terms of inter-user delay, which fails to consider the whereabouts of the other users in a conferencing session, (2) the agents may have heterogeneous bandwidth and processing availability, such that the best Transco ding agents should be carefully identified, for cost minimization while best serving all the users requiring the transcoded streams. To address these challenges, we formulate the user-to-agent assignment and Transco ding-agent selection problems, which targets at minimizing the operational cost of the conferencing provider while keeping the conferencing delay low. The optimization problem is combinatorial in nature and difficult to solve. Using Markov approximation framework, we design a decentralized algorithm that provably converges to a bounded neighborhood of the optimal solution. An agent ranking scheme is also proposed to properly initialize our algorithm so as to improve its convergence. The results from a prototype system implementation show that our design in a set of Internet-scale scenarios reduces the operational cost by 77% as compared to a commonly-adopted alternative, while simultaneously yielding lower conferencing delays.

[1]  Di Niu,et al.  Server Selection and Topology Control for Multi-Party Video Conferences , 2014, NOSSDAV 2014.

[2]  Minghua Chen,et al.  Utility Maximization in Peer-to-Peer Systems With Applications to Video Conferencing , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[3]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Analytical Modeling for Delay-Sensitive Video Over WLAN , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[4]  Zhe Wu,et al.  Understanding the latency benefits of multi-cloud webservice deployments , 2013, CCRV.

[5]  Minghua Chen,et al.  Optimal Distributed P2P Streaming Under Node Degree Bounds , 2010, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[6]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[7]  Franco Scarselli,et al.  Inside PageRank , 2005, TOIT.

[8]  Bo Li,et al.  Airlift: Video conferencing as a cloud service using inter-datacenter networks , 2012, 2012 20th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP).

[9]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Delay-Constrained Video Transmission: Quality-Driven Resource Allocation and Scheduling , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[10]  Sébastien Lafond,et al.  Prediction-Based Dynamic Resource Allocation for Video Transcoding in Cloud Computing , 2013, 2013 21st Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing.

[11]  Kathryn A. Dowsland,et al.  Simulated Annealing , 1989, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[12]  Live migration in green virtualized networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[13]  John Odentrantz,et al.  Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues , 2000, Technometrics.

[14]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Yao Zhao,et al.  Celerity: A Low-Delay Multi-Party Conferencing Solution , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[16]  Minghua Chen,et al.  Markov Approximation for Combinatorial Network Optimization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  Ali Ghodsi,et al.  Highly Available Transactions: Virtues and Limitations , 2013, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[18]  Minlan Yu,et al.  Rethinking virtual network embedding: substrate support for path splitting and migration , 2008, CCRV.

[19]  Peter Rossmanith,et al.  Simulated Annealing , 2008, Taschenbuch der Algorithmen.

[20]  Fei Li,et al.  A server's perspective of Internet streaming delivery to mobile devices , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[21]  Wenwu Zhu,et al.  Online Allocation of Communication and Computation Resources for Real-Time Multimedia Services , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[22]  Xiang Cheng,et al.  Virtual network embedding through topology-aware node ranking , 2011, CCRV.

[23]  Xavier Hesselbach,et al.  Virtual Network Embedding: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[24]  Bo Li,et al.  vSkyConf: cloud-assisted multi-party mobile video conferencing , 2013, MCC '13.