Development and validation of a novel pedometer algorithm to quantify extended characteristics of the locomotor behavior of dairy cows.

Behavior is one of the most important indicators for assessing cattle health and well-being. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel algorithm to monitor locomotor behavior of loose-housed dairy cows based on the output of the RumiWatch pedometer (ITIN+HOCH GmbH, Fütterungstechnik, Liestal, Switzerland). Data of locomotion were acquired by simultaneous pedometer measurements at a sampling rate of 10 Hz and video recordings for manual observation later. The study consisted of 3 independent experiments. Experiment 1 was carried out to develop and validate the algorithm for lying behavior, experiment 2 for walking and standing behavior, and experiment 3 for stride duration and stride length. The final version was validated, using the raw data, collected from cows not included in the development of the algorithm. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between accelerometer variables and respective data derived from the video recordings (gold standard). Dichotomous data were expressed as the proportion of correctly detected events, and the overall difference for continuous data was expressed as the relative measurement error. The proportions for correctly detected events or bouts were 1 for stand ups, lie downs, standing bouts, and lying bouts and 0.99 for walking bouts. The relative measurement error and Spearman correlation coefficient for lying time were 0.09% and 1; for standing time, 4.7% and 0.96; for walking time, 17.12% and 0.96; for number of strides, 6.23% and 0.98; for stride duration, 6.65% and 0.75; and for stride length, 11.92% and 0.81, respectively. The strong to very high correlations of the variables between visual observation and converted pedometer data indicate that the novel RumiWatch algorithm may markedly improve automated livestock management systems for efficient health monitoring of dairy cows.

[1]  L. Green,et al.  Assessment of the welfare of dairy caftle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records , 2003, Veterinary Record.

[2]  H. Whay,et al.  Recognition and management of pain in cattle , 2008, In Practice.

[3]  L. Plümer,et al.  Electronic detection of lameness in dairy cows through measuring pedometric activity and lying behavior , 2012 .

[4]  D. Weary,et al.  Feeding behavior identifies dairy cows at risk for metritis. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  F. Ahrens,et al.  What happens with cow behavior when replacing concrete slatted floor by rubber coating: a case study. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  D. Sprecher,et al.  A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. , 1997, Theriogenology.

[7]  D. Weary,et al.  Effect of hoof pathologies on subjective assessments of dairy cow gait. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  J. Coetzee,et al.  Assessment and management of pain associated with lameness in cattle. , 2013, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[9]  A Bach,et al.  Short communication: lying behavior of lactating dairy cows is influenced by lameness especially around feeding time. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  L. Boyle,et al.  A brief note on the validation of a system for recording lying behaviour in dairy cows , 2008 .

[11]  David G. Renter,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional accelerometers to monitor and classify behavior patterns in cattle , 2009 .

[12]  C. G. van Reenen,et al.  Automatic monitoring of lying, standing and walking behavior in dairy cattle , 2007 .

[13]  M. Endres,et al.  Prevalence of lameness in high-producing holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  N. Cook,et al.  Investigation Strategies for Laminitis Problem Herds , 2004 .

[15]  J Rushen,et al.  Measurement of acceleration while walking as an automated method for gait assessment in dairy cattle. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  E. Anderson Hudson et al. , 1977 .

[17]  M. Coffey,et al.  Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  C Bisaglia,et al.  Methodology for quantifying the behavioral activity of dairy cows in freestall barns. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[19]  F. Skjøth,et al.  Technical note: Quantifying and characterizing behavior in dairy calves using the IceTag automatic recording device. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  N. Cook,et al.  Monitoring indices of cow comfort in free-stall-housed dairy herds. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  D Berckmans,et al.  Analysis of individual classification of lameness using automatic measurement of back posture in dairy cattle. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  Richard Taylor Interpretation of the Correlation Coefficient: A Basic Review , 1990 .

[23]  Lars Relund Nielsen,et al.  Quantifying walking and standing behaviour of dairy cows using a moving average based on output from an accelerometer. , 2010 .

[24]  L. Schrader,et al.  Individual consistency of dairy cows' activity in their home pen. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  D. Weary,et al.  Hoof pathologies influence kinematic measures of dairy cow gait. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  D M Weary,et al.  Lying behavior as an indicator of lameness in dairy cows. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  J. Cutler Welfare in dairy cattle: Epidemiologic approaches for detection and treatment of lameness , 2012 .