Conservation tools: the next generation of engineering–biology collaborations

The recent increase in public and academic interest in preserving biodiversity has led to the growth of the field of conservation technology. This field involves designing and constructing tools that use technology to aid in the conservation of wildlife. In this review, we present five case studies and infer a framework for designing conservation tools (CT) based on human–wildlife interaction. Successful CT range in complexity from cat collars to machine learning and game theory methodologies and do not require technological expertise to contribute to conservation tool creation. Our goal is to introduce researchers to the field of conservation technology and provide references for guiding the next generation of conservation technologists. Conservation technology not only has the potential to benefit biodiversity but also has broader impacts on fields such as sustainability and environmental protection. By using innovative technologies to address conservation challenges, we can find more effective and efficient solutions to protect and preserve our planet’s resources.

[1]  D. Butterfield,et al.  Air-quality networks collect environmental DNA with the potential to measure biodiversity at continental scales , 2023, Current Biology.

[2]  M. Wikelski,et al.  A novel kinetic energy harvesting system for lifetime deployments of wildlife trackers , 2023, PloS one.

[3]  S. Sugiyama,et al.  Acoustic Sensing of Glacial Discharge in Greenland , 2023, Geophysical Research Letters.

[4]  S. Mintchev,et al.  Drone-assisted collection of environmental DNA from tree branches for biodiversity monitoring , 2023, Science Robotics.

[5]  A. Zellmer,et al.  Urban wildlife corridors: Building bridges for wildlife and people , 2022, Frontiers in Sustainable Cities.

[6]  Meredith L. Gore,et al.  Quantitative Investigation of Wildlife Trafficking Supply Chains: A Review , 2022, Omega.

[7]  S. von der Heyden Environmental DNA surveys of African biodiversity: State of knowledge, challenges, and opportunities , 2022, Environmental DNA.

[8]  Grant Van Horn,et al.  The Caltech Fish Counting Dataset: A Benchmark for Multiple-Object Tracking and Counting , 2022, ECCV.

[9]  A. Rogers,et al.  SnapperGPS: Open Hardware for Energy-Efficient, Low-Cost Wildlife Location Tracking with Snapshot GNSS , 2022, Journal of Open Hardware.

[10]  Jun-sheng Li,et al.  eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[11]  J. Fischer,et al.  Opportunities and risks in the use of drones for studying animal behaviour , 2022, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[12]  S. Jarman,et al.  A review of applications of environmental DNA for reptile conservation and management , 2022, Ecology and evolution.

[13]  Morgan R. Gostel,et al.  The Expanding Role of DNA Barcodes: Indispensable Tools for Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation , 2022, Diversity.

[14]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Harmonizing Forest Conservation Policies with Essential Biodiversity Variables Incorporating Remote Sensing and Environmental DNA Technologies , 2022, Forests.

[15]  J. Dongarra,et al.  Reinventing High Performance Computing: Challenges and Opportunities , 2022, ArXiv.

[16]  Jun-sheng Li,et al.  eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[17]  David J. Smith,et al.  HydroMoth: Testing a prototype low‐cost acoustic recorder for aquatic environments , 2022, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

[18]  Brett L. Bruyere,et al.  A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology , 2021, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[19]  Hamed Alemohammad,et al.  Toward Foundation Models for Earth Monitoring: Proposal for a Climate Change Benchmark , 2021, ArXiv.

[20]  C. Darimont,et al.  Contributions of Indigenous Knowledge to ecological and evolutionary understanding , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[21]  P. Jansen,et al.  Methods for wildlife monitoring in tropical forests: Comparing human observations, camera traps, and passive acoustic sensors , 2021, Conservation Science and Practice.

[22]  Elio J. Challita,et al.  Frugal Science Powered by Curiosity. , 2021, Industrial & engineering chemistry research.

[23]  Silvia Zuffi,et al.  Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation , 2021, Nature Communications.

[24]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  An ultra-low-cost electroporator with microneedle electrodes (ePatch) for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Richard J. Fair,et al.  The Expanding Reaction Toolkit for DNA-Encoded Libraries. , 2021, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[26]  K. Kinney,et al.  Development of a reproducible method for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater , 2021, Science of The Total Environment.

[27]  Kevin Winner,et al.  Species Distribution Modeling for Machine Learning Practitioners: A Review , 2021, COMPASS.

[28]  Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf,et al.  The Animal ID Problem: Continual Curation , 2021, ArXiv.

[29]  Fei Fang,et al.  Robust Reinforcement Learning Under Minimax Regret for Green Security , 2021, UAI.

[30]  Willson Gaul,et al.  Monitoring migration timing in remote habitats: assessing the value of extended duration audio recording , 2021 .

[31]  Weinan Zhang,et al.  Data-Driven Multimodal Patrol Planning for Anti-poaching , 2021, AAAI.

[32]  Tesfaw Melkamu Adugna,et al.  A Review on Success and Failures of Conservation Agriculture Practices in Ethiopia , 2021, International Journal of Environmental Chemistry.

[33]  Salva Rühling Cachay,et al.  The World as a Graph: Improving El Niño Forecasts with Graph Neural Networks , 2021, ArXiv.

[34]  H. Ballard,et al.  Exploring the participation of young citizen scientists in scientific research: The case of iNaturalist , 2021, PloS one.

[35]  Mark W. Chynoweth,et al.  Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture Through Camera Trapping: A Review of Benchmark Analyses for Wildlife Density Estimation , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[36]  Carles Flaquer,et al.  Monitoring cave-dwelling bats using remote passive acoustic detectors: a new approach for cave monitoring , 2020 .

[37]  Joshua M. Pearce Economic savings for scientific free and open source technology: A review , 2020, HardwareX.

[38]  J. Birch,et al.  Robotic environmental DNA bio-surveillance of freshwater health , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[39]  M. Nowak,et al.  Mobile GIS applications for environmental field surveys: A state of the art , 2020 .

[40]  A. Suarez,et al.  From eDNA to citizen science: emerging tools for the early detection of invasive species , 2020 .

[41]  Sara Beery,et al.  The iWildCam 2020 Competition Dataset , 2020, ArXiv.

[42]  P. Shetty The Evolution of DNA Extraction Methods , 2020, American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research.

[43]  Reinhard Koch,et al.  A Survey on Semi-, Self- and Unsupervised Learning for Image Classification , 2020, IEEE Access.

[44]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Environmental DNA is not the tool by itself. , 2019, Journal of fish biology.

[45]  Hui Xiong,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning , 2019, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[46]  Daniel Edler,et al.  raxmlGUI 2.0 beta: a graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML , 2019, bioRxiv.

[47]  Alex Rogers,et al.  AudioMoth: A low-cost acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment , 2019, HardwareX.

[48]  Dan Morris,et al.  Efficient Pipeline for Camera Trap Image Review , 2019, ArXiv.

[49]  John Effah,et al.  Application Programming Interface (API) Research: A Review of the Past to Inform the Future , 2019, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Dawn Song,et al.  Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertainty , 2019, NeurIPS.

[51]  Alex Rogers,et al.  Leveraging conservation action with open‐source hardware , 2019, Conservation Letters.

[52]  Marquidia Pacheco,et al.  Green Technologies to Improve the Environment on Earth , 2019, Green Technologies to Improve the Environment on Earth.

[53]  Xareni P. Pacheco,et al.  How Technology Can Transform Wildlife Conservation , 2018, Green Technologies to Improve the Environment on Earth.

[54]  Diego Llusia,et al.  Terrestrial Passive Acoustic Monitoring: Review and Perspectives , 2018, BioScience.

[55]  J. Lahoz‐Monfort,et al.  Conservation technology: The next generation , 2018 .

[56]  Jónas R. Viðarsson,et al.  DNA barcoding revealing mislabeling of seafood in European mass caterings , 2018, Food Control.

[57]  James Smith Parasitic and parachute research in global health. , 2018, The Lancet. Global health.

[58]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Recognition in Terra Incognita , 2018, ECCV.

[59]  Nicole D. Sintov,et al.  Fostering adoption of conservation technologies: a case study with wildlife law enforcement rangers , 2018, Oryx.

[60]  Alex Rogers,et al.  AudioMoth: Evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment , 2018 .

[61]  Saxon R. Shaw There is no silver bullet: solutions to Internet jurisdiction , 2017, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[62]  Roberta Kwok,et al.  Field Instruments: Build it yourself , 2017, Nature.

[63]  M. Saad Bhamla,et al.  Hand-powered ultralow-cost paper centrifuge , 2017, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[64]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Integrating technologies for scalable ecology and conservation , 2016 .

[65]  David P. Olson,et al.  Scaling-Up the Use of Chili Fences for Reducing Human-Elephant Conflict Across Landscapes in Tanzania , 2016 .

[66]  Luis Roman Carrasco,et al.  Mobile Applications to Link Sustainable Consumption with Impacts on the Environment and Biodiversity , 2016 .

[67]  P. White,et al.  Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities , 2015, Wildlife Research.

[68]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction , 2015, Science Advances.

[69]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity , 2015 .

[70]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context , 2014, ECCV.

[71]  James S. Cybulski,et al.  Foldscope: Origami-Based Paper Microscope , 2014, PloS one.

[72]  P. Marra,et al.  The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States , 2013, Nature Communications.

[73]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[74]  Peter Smith,et al.  Professional Website Performance: Optimizing the Front-End and Back-End , 2012 .

[75]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Building Research Equipment with Free, Open-Source Hardware , 2012, Science.

[76]  S. Hernandez,et al.  Public Perceptions of Domestic Cats and Preferences for Feral Cat Management in the Southeastern United States , 2012 .

[77]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Information design , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[78]  Andreas M. Ali,et al.  Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus , 2011 .

[79]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Computer Vision - Algorithms and Applications , 2011, Texts in Computer Science.

[80]  M. K. Obrist,et al.  Rapid biodiversity assessment of arthropods for monitoring average local species richness and related ecosystem services , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[81]  M. Shah,et al.  Object tracking: A survey , 2006, CSUR.

[82]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Economics of Technology Sharing: Open Source and Beyond , 2004 .

[83]  R. Payne,et al.  RESTRICTABLE DNA FROM SLOUGHED CETACEAN SKIN; ITS POTENTIAL FOR USE IN POPULATION ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[84]  A. Williams,et al.  An Exploratory Case Study on Student Teachers' Experiences of Using the AR App Seek by iNaturalist When Learning About Plants , 2023, HCI.

[85]  J. Mendelson,et al.  SYMPOSIUM A Guide for Successful Research Collaborations between Zoos and Universities , 2022 .

[86]  Andrea Thompson,et al.  Poached : inside the dark world of wildlife trafficking , 2018 .

[87]  J. Nugent Birds, Binoculars, and Biodiversity: Count Birds and Contribute to Citizen Science with the Great Backyard Bird Count , 2018 .

[88]  J. Nugent Citizen Science: Birds, Binoculars, and Biodiversity , 2018 .

[89]  S. K. Willson,et al.  Birds be safe: Can a novel cat collar reduce avian mortality by domestic cats (Felis catus)? , 2015 .

[90]  Irus Braverman Conservation without nature: the trouble with in situ versus ex situ conservation , 2014 .

[91]  H. Bradley Shaffer,et al.  Evolution and Conservation , 2013 .

[92]  S. Loss,et al.  Assisted colonization: Integrating conservation strategies in the face of climate change , 2011 .

[93]  R. Nawrotzki,et al.  Addressing climate change with indigenous knowledge. , 2010 .

[94]  M. Usher,et al.  Wildlife conservation evaluation: attributes, criteria and values , 1986 .

[95]  A. Krizhevsky ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks , 2022 .