Perceptions of cannabis among Humboldt County timberland and ranchland owners

Cannabis is often grown on agricultural and forest lands in California, but little is known about the adjustments that traditional agriculture and timber producers are making to their livelihoods as cannabis becomes legal under state law. Our goal in this research was to better understand how larger landowners, whose families have often produced timber and cattle for generations, are experiencing increased cannabis production in their areas — and also to better understand these landowners' perceptions of the impacts of cannabis, whether positive or negative, on their communities. To accomplish this, we surveyed landowners who owned at least 500 acres in Humboldt County, an area that — more than 40 years ago — became one of the first California counties to begin experiencing expansive cannabis cultivation. Of the 211 landowners we invited to complete a survey, 71 responded, providing insights into their experiences with and perceptions of cannabis production. Many survey respondents reported illegal cultivation on their properties, problems with shared roads and other direct negative effects of cannabis production. Most landowners also reported that cannabis production has increased the cost of labor, though they acknowledge that it has increased the value of their property as well. Survey respondents, however, have not changed their views of cannabis with legalization. The findings of this study illustrate some of the challenges involved in developing land use ordinances and other policies that can support multiple industries whose interests may be in competition.

[1]  V. Butsic,et al.  The emergence of cannabis agriculture frontiers as environmental threats , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[2]  M. Polson Planning for marijuana : Development, governance and regional political economy , 2017 .

[3]  V. Butsic,et al.  Cannabis (Cannabis sativa or C. indica) agriculture and the environment: a systematic, spatially-explicit survey and potential impacts , 2016 .

[4]  M. Brownlee,et al.  Managers’ Perceptions of Illegal Marijuana Cultivation on U.S. Federal Lands , 2016 .

[5]  K. Bell,et al.  “Communities in the middle”: Interactions between drivers of change and place-based characteristics in rural forest-based communities , 2015 .

[6]  R. Sweitzer,et al.  Patterns of Natural and Human-Caused Mortality Factors of a Rare Forest Carnivore, the Fisher (Pekania pennanti) in California , 2015, PloS one.

[7]  M. Polson From Outlaw to Citizen: Police Power, Property, and the Territorial Politics of Medical Marijuana in California's Exurbs , 2015, Territory, politics, governance.

[8]  Brianne J. Johnson,et al.  High Time for Conservation: Adding the Environment to the Debate on Marijuana Liberalization , 2015, Bioscience.

[9]  J. Olson,et al.  Impacts of Surface Water Diversions for Marijuana Cultivation on Aquatic Habitat in Four Northwestern California Watersheds , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Dominic Corva Requiem for a CAMP: the life and death of a domestic U.S. drug war institution. , 2014, The International journal on drug policy.

[11]  M. Polson Land and Law in Marijuana Country: Clean Capital, Dirty Money, and the Drug War's Rentier Nexus. , 2013, Political and legal anthropology review : PoLAR.

[12]  Joseph S. Leeper Humboldt County: its role in the emerald triangle , 1990 .