Micro-indentation fracture behavior of human enamel.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the crack resistance behavior (K(R)) of human enamel in relation to its microstructure. METHODS Human molar teeth were precision cut, polished and tested using Vickers micro-indentation at different loads ranging from 0.98 to 9.8 N. Five indentation load levels were considered, 20 indentation cracks for each load level were introduced on the surface of the test specimen (10 indentations per tooth) and their variability was evaluated using Weibull statistics and an empirical model. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to analyze the crack morphology and propagation mechanisms involved. RESULTS The results showed that enamel exhibited increasing cracking resistance (K(R)) with increasing load. It was found that the crack propagation mainly depended on the location and the microstructure it encountered. SEM showed the formation of crack bridges and crack deflection near the indentation crack tip. The crack mode was of Palmqvist type even at larger loads of 9.8 N. This was mainly attributed to the large process zone created by the interwoven lamellar rod like microstructure exhibited by the enamel surface. SIGNIFICANCE This study shows that there are still considerable prospects for improving dental ceramics and for mimicking the enamel structure developed by nature.

[1]  G D STIBBS,et al.  Operative Dentistry , 1883, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[2]  A. Heuer,et al.  Fracture Properties of Human Enamel and Dentin , 1976, Journal of dental research.

[3]  J. Gong,et al.  On the local crack resistance of Al2O3–TiC composites evaluated by direct indentation method , 2001 .

[4]  C. Doyle Advances in biomaterials: Lee SM editor 1987 Volume 1. Lancaster, PA: Technomics Inc. 286pp. $65 , 1987 .

[5]  Michael V Swain,et al.  Influence of environment on the mechanical behaviour of mature human enamel. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[6]  P. Kotru,et al.  Fracture mechanics, crack propagation and microhardness studies on flux grown ErAlO3 single crystals , 2009 .

[7]  R. F. Bunshah,et al.  Fracture Toughness of Human Enamel , 1981, Journal of dental research.

[8]  T. Cate,et al.  Oral histology: Development, structure, and function , 1980 .

[9]  R. Bowen,et al.  Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. , 1962, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  D. Watts,et al.  Fracture Toughness of Human Dentin , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[11]  W H Douglas,et al.  Structure-Property Relations and Crack Resistance at the Bovine Dentin-Enamel Junction , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[12]  Eugeniusz Sajewicz,et al.  On evaluation of wear resistance of tooth enamel and dental materials , 2006 .

[13]  J. Gong,et al.  R-curve behavior of indentation cracks in silicon nitride based ceramic composite , 1994 .

[14]  A Asundi,et al.  Experimental studies on the nature of property gradients in the human dentine. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Fracture Properties of Human Enamel and Dentin in an Aqueous Environment , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[16]  Dinesh K. Shetty,et al.  Rising Crack-Growth-Resistance (R-Curve) Behavior of Toughened Alumina and Silicon Nitride , 1991 .

[17]  R. G. Craig Advances in biomaterials from 1957 to 1997. , 1999, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[18]  G C PAFFENBARGER,et al.  Determination of some compressive properties of human enamel and dentin. , 1958, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[19]  F. A. Peyton,et al.  The Microhardness of Enamel and Dentin , 1958 .

[20]  E Romberg,et al.  Indentation Damage and Mechanical Properties of Human Enamel and Dentin , 1998, Journal of dental research.

[21]  M. Eisenburger,et al.  Erosion and attrition of human enamel in vitro part II: influence of time and loading. , 2002, Journal of dentistry.