Father–offspring resemblance predicts paternal investment in humans

In species in which paternal care of offspring is important but paternity is uncertain, evolutionary theory suggests that kin recognition mechanisms (e.g. phenotype matching) should evolve. Fathers are expected to discriminate between their children and others’ on the basis of phenotypic similarities, and they should allocate resources accordingly. However, studies showing that males assess paternity by phenotype matching are rare. In a polygynous human population of rural Senegal, we examined the relationships between (1) actual father–child resemblance through both the facial and the olfactory phenotypes; (2) fathers’ investment of resources in each child; and (3) child nutritional condition. We found that paternal investment was positively related to both face and odour similarities between fathers and children. Additionally, such discriminative paternal investment was linked to the children’s health: children who received more investment had better growth and nutritional status. This is the first evidence that paternal investment is associated with father–child resemblance in real human families, and, furthermore, that these discrepancies in paternal investment result in differences in fitness-related traits in children.

[1]  A. Little,et al.  Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  B. Neff,et al.  Dynamic adjustment of parental care in response to perceived paternity , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Kristen Anderson How Well Does Paternity Confidence Match Actual Paternity? , 2006, Current Anthropology.

[4]  L. Maloney,et al.  Where are kin recognition signals in the human face? , 2006, Journal of vision.

[5]  L. Simmons,et al.  Confidence of paternity and paternal care: covariation revealed through the experimental manipulation of the mating system in the beetle Onthophagus taurus , 2002 .

[6]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Helping‐at‐the‐Nest and Sex‐Biased Parental Investment in a Hungarian Gypsy Population , 2002, Current Anthropology.

[7]  V. Quinsey,et al.  The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences , 2002, Human nature.

[8]  A. J. Hawkins,et al.  The Inventory of Father Involvement: A Pilot Study of a New Measure of Father Involvement , 2002 .

[9]  Feroze B. Mohamed,et al.  Sex differences in the neural correlates of child facial resemblance: an event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[10]  T. Burke,et al.  Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extra-pair paternity in the reed bunting , 1994, Nature.

[11]  B. Sheldon Relating paternity to paternal care. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  W. Hamilton The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[13]  W. Potts,et al.  The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Sperm competition and sexual selection , 1998 .

[15]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[16]  R. Garland The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is it Desirable? , 1991 .

[17]  Richard H. Porter,et al.  Recognition of kin through characteristic body odors , 1986 .

[18]  H. Ellegren,et al.  Paternal effort related to experimentally manipulated paternity of male collared flycatchers , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  A. Geliebter,et al.  Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles , 2002, Human nature.

[20]  M. Russell,et al.  Mother's identification of their infant's odors , 1983 .

[21]  P. Sherman,et al.  Nestling recognition via direct cues by parental male bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[22]  G. Weisfeld,et al.  Possible olfaction-based mechanisms in human kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  B. Neff,et al.  Multiple paternity and kin recognition mechanisms in a guppy population , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[24]  L. Okagaki,et al.  Parenting: An Ecological Perspective , 2006 .

[25]  G. Heth,et al.  Genetic relatedness assessment through individual odour similarities in mice , 2003 .

[26]  C. Wedekind,et al.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Thomas E. Myers,et al.  How much paternal resemblance is enough? Sex differences in hypothetical investment decisions but not in the detection of resemblance , 2003 .

[28]  J. Ott,et al.  Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland. , 1994, Human heredity.

[29]  P. Sherman,et al.  Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior , 1993 .

[30]  R. Hames,et al.  Birth order, sibling investment, and fertility among Ju/’Hoansi (!Kung) , 2000, Human nature.

[31]  P. Sherman,et al.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The architecture of human kin detection , 2007, Nature.

[33]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles , 1997, Human nature.

[34]  R. Chakraborty,et al.  Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: a validation study with blood group markers. , 1999, American journal of physical anthropology.

[35]  G. Shepherd The Human Sense of Smell: Are We Better Than We Think? , 2004, PLoS biology.

[36]  Robert P Freckleton,et al.  Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[37]  M. Gross The Evolution of Parental Care , 2005, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[38]  M. Bellis,et al.  Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences , 2005, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[39]  G. Gallup,et al.  Sex differences in olfactory self-recognition , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[40]  K. V. Rao,et al.  An evaluation of the relationship between nutritional status and anthropometric measurements. , 1970, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[41]  Y. Ihara,et al.  A Model for Evolution of Male Parental Care and Female Multiple Mating , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[42]  Lisa M. DeBruine,et al.  Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women , 2004 .

[43]  R. Porter,et al.  Maternal recognition of neonates through olfactory cues , 1983, Physiology & Behavior.

[44]  M. O'Riain,et al.  Colony member recognition and xenophobia in the naked mole-rat , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  R. Mace Biased parental investment and reproductive success in Gabbra pastoralists , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[46]  Jonathan Wright 4 – Paternity and Paternal Care , 1998 .

[47]  Ralph Hertwig,et al.  Parental investment: how an equity motive can produce inequality. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  Coren L. Apicella,et al.  Perceived mate fidelity and paternal resemblance predict men's investment in children , 2004 .

[49]  H. Kaiser An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[50]  G. Gallup,et al.  Reactions to children's faces: Resemblance affects males more than females , 2002 .

[51]  H. Euler,et al.  Discriminative grandparental solicitude as reproductive strategy , 1996, Human nature.

[52]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[53]  B. Campbell Forces and Strategies in Evolution. (Book Reviews: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971) , 1972 .

[54]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Parent-progeny recognition as a function of MHC odortype identity. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  D. Perrett,et al.  The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness , 2004 .

[56]  P. Sherman,et al.  In Vitro Fertilization Reveals Offspring Recognition via Self-Referencing in a Fish with Paternal Care and Cuckoldry , 2005 .

[57]  P. Bressan,et al.  Men Do not Have a Stronger Preference than Women for Self-resemblant Child Faces , 2009, Archives of sexual behavior.

[58]  J. Mateo KIN RECOGNITION IN GROUND SQUIRRELS AND OTHER RODENTS , 2003 .

[59]  Thomas E. Myers,et al.  Reactions to children's faces: Males are more affected by resemblance than females are, and so are their brains , 2004 .

[60]  Jessica Dennis,et al.  Fathers: Cultural and Ecological Perspectives , 2006 .

[61]  Gallup,et al.  Perceptions of paternal resemblance predict family violence. , 2000, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[62]  R. Johnstone Recognition and the evolution of distinctive signatures: when does it pay to reveal identity? , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  J. Langlois,et al.  Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  H. Reeve,et al.  Nestmate recognition in social wasps: the origin and acquisition of recognition odours , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Paternal confidence and paternal investment: A cross cultural test of a sociobiological hypothesis , 1980 .

[66]  R. Porter,et al.  Human kin recognition by olfactory cues , 1981, Physiology & Behavior.

[67]  L Greenberg,et al.  Genetic Component of Bee Odor in Kin Recognition , 1979, Science.

[68]  E. Voland,et al.  Differential infant mortality viewed from an evolutionary biological perspective , 2002 .