Robotically Assisted Beating Heart Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass (TECAB). is There a Future?

Objective Since the introduction of beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB), approximately 400 patients have undergone the procedure worldwide. Despite satisfactory results and reduced morbidity, the procedure has not gained wide acceptance. This report describes the authors’ experience of beating heart TECAB with robotic assistance and the potential adoption of this technique for the future. Methods Between July 2004 and December 2005, 93 patients underwent successful for beating heart TECAB (47 males and 46 females). Mean age was 67.4 + 12.3 years. Fifteen (13.8%) were excluded or converted intraoperatively to thoracotomy for completion of procedure. The procedure was performed through port incisions for the robotic arms and the endostabilizer. Single or bilateral internal thoracic arteries were used as conduits. Anastomoses were done using surgical U-clips. Eighteen (19.4%) patients underwent planned hybrid revascularization. Eighty-four (90.3%) patients underwent computed tomography or conventional angiography. Results Details of 93 completed revascularization cases are summarized in the tables. No in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, or CVA was noted. Mean operative time was 272.6 + 128.9 minutes (median, 270 minutes). Mean anastomotic time was 13.8 + 3.7 minutes. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.4 + 2.0 days (median, 3 days). At the time of study, 122 of 122 (100%) grafts were found to be patent. Conclusions Single- and multivessel beating heart TECAB with or without hybrid revascularization may offer a less invasive approach in a selected group of patients.

[1]  M. Mack,et al.  Pro: beating-heart surgery for coronary revascularization: is it the most important development since the introduction of the heart-lung machine? , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  Sudhir P Srivastava,et al.  Use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in CABG through lateral thoracotomy with robotic assistance in 150 patients. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  H. Schaff,et al.  Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  D. Loulmet,et al.  Results of the prospective multicenter trial of robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  G. E. Green,et al.  Internal thoracic artery grafts: 20-year clinical follow-up. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  C. Herzog,et al.  Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft: initial experience with an additional instrument arm and an advanced camera system , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[7]  F. Loop,et al.  Superiority of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: it's been a long time comin'. , 2001, Circulation.

[8]  S. Westaby,et al.  Less invasive coronary surgery: consensus from the Oxford meeting. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  J G Grandjean,et al.  Video-assisted minimally invasive coronary operations without cardiopulmonary bypass: a multicenter study. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  F. Mohr,et al.  Total endoscopic computer enhanced coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2000, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[11]  Sudhir P Srivastava,et al.  Off-pump complete revascularization through a left lateral thoracotomy (ThoraCAB): the first 200 cases. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  V I Kolessov,et al.  Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. , 1967, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  G. Friedrich,et al.  Treatment of double vessel coronary artery disease by totally endoscopic bypass surgery and drug-eluting stent placement in one simultaneous hybrid session. , 2005, The heart surgery forum.

[14]  B. Griffith,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  B. Hamman,et al.  Interrupted distal anastomosis: the interrupted "porcupine" technique. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  Thomas A Vassiliades,et al.  Long-term results of the endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  F. Benetti,et al.  Direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 700 patients. , 1991, Chest.

[18]  M. Ono,et al.  Early experience of coronary artery bypass grafting with a new self-closing clip device. , 2002, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[19]  A. Bochenek,et al.  Integrated minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization. , 2002, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[20]  F. Loop,et al.  Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  A. Tector,et al.  Comparative hemodynamic properties of vein and mammary artery in coronary bypass operations. , 1975, The Annals of thoracic surgery.