Transport-Related Fringe Benefits: Implications for Moving and the Journey to Work

Firms offer compensation not only through wages, but also offer transport-related fringe benefits such as transport benefits (company cars, travel, and parking benefits) and relocation benefits to job applicants. We argue that these benefits are not randomly offered to employees, but depend on the job applicants' commuting costs. The firms' choice between these benefits affects the workers' incentive to move their residence closer to the workplace. Using information on firms' recruitment behavior in the United Kingdom, this paper shows empirically that the applicants' journey-to-work time induces firms to offer these benefits to job applicants. The implications of transport-related fringe benefits for commuting and relocation are found to be rather distinct. Transport benefits make employees less sensitive to the costs of commuting, whereas relocation benefits induce employees to move closer to the workplace.

[1]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[2]  T. To,et al.  Oligopsony and monopsonistic competition in labor markets , 2002 .

[3]  K. Train.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[4]  Alan Manning,et al.  The Real Thin Theory: Monopsony in Modern Labour Markets , 2003 .

[5]  S. K. Mayo,et al.  Intraurban residential mobility: The role of transactions costs, market imperfections, and household disequilibrium , 1981 .

[6]  Trevor Jackson,et al.  Traffic congestion , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Y. Zenou.  High Relocation Costs in Search-Matching Models: Theory and Application to Spatial Mismatch , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Residential Mobility and Local Housing-Market Differences , 2002 .

[9]  Gerard J. van den Berg,et al.  Estimating the Marginal Willingness to Pay for Commuting , 2000 .

[10]  M. Berger,et al.  Effects of the Tax Treatment of Fringe Benefits on Labor Market Segmentation , 1989 .

[11]  Dale T. Mortensen,et al.  Wage Differentials, Employer Size, and Unemployment , 1998 .

[12]  Ronald G. Ehrenberg,et al.  Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy. , 1984 .

[13]  D. Shoup,et al.  Cashing Out Employer-Paid Parking: A Precedent for Congestion Pricing? , 1993 .

[14]  G. Maddala.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[15]  Andrew Henley,et al.  Residential Mobility, Housing Equity and the Labour Market , 1998 .

[16]  P. Rietveld,et al.  Company cars and company-provided parking , 2002 .

[17]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[18]  M. White,et al.  Sex Differences in Urban Commuting Patterns , 1986 .

[19]  Richard Willson,et al.  EMPLOYER-PAID PARKING: THE PROBLEM AND PROPOSED SOLUTIONS , 1992 .

[20]  K. Moser,et al.  Recruiting Employees. Individual and Organisational Perspectives , 1998 .

[21]  Jeffrey S. Zax,et al.  Compensation for commutes in labor and housing markets , 1991 .

[22]  C. A. Pissarides,et al.  Equilibrium Unemployment Theory , 1990 .

[23]  R. Muth.  CITIES AND HOUSING; THE SPATIAL PATTERN OF URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. , 1969 .

[24]  Yves Zenou,et al.  Does City Structure Affect Job Search and Welfare , 2002 .

[25]  Gerard J. van den Berg,et al.  Job search and Commuting Time , 1997 .