Enhanced quantitative analysis of resist image contrast upon line- edge roughness (LER)

Correlations between LER and various types of aerial image contrast were examined for three different commercial resists. LER was more tightly correlated with the standard (max-min) definition of contrast than with the others examined, suggesting that background flare is most accountable for aerial image profile-induced LER. The relationship was nearly inverse, with LER proportional to α (contrast)-0.85. In the latter portion of this paper, an image deblurring technique to recover more accurate LER data from SEM images was devised. This technique showed that, at times, LER can vary significantly before and after deblurring. Some initial tests to prove the validity of this LER measurement enhancement technique were performed, all with positive results.

[1]  Shigeru Moriya,et al.  Comparative study of resolution limiting factors in electron beam lithography using the edge roughness evaluation method , 2001 .

[2]  Kenji Yamazaki,et al.  Influence of edge roughness in resist patterns on etched patterns , 1998 .

[3]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  LER as structural fluctuation of resist reaction and developer percolation , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Xiaofan Meng,et al.  Effects of image contrast and resist types upon line edge roughness (LER) , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[5]  D S Biggs,et al.  Acceleration of iterative image restoration algorithms. , 1997, Applied optics.

[6]  Shinji Okazaki,et al.  Suppression of Acid Diffusion in Chemical Amplification Resists by Molecular Control of Base Matrix Polymers , 1995 .

[7]  Marie Angelopoulos,et al.  Line-edge roughness in positive-tone chemically amplified resists: effect of additives and processing conditions , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  James W. Thackeray,et al.  Investigation of lithographic performance for 120-nm and sub-120-nm gate applications of advanced ArF resists based on VEMA co-polymers , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Hiroshi Ito,et al.  Aerial image contrast using interferometric lithography: effect on line-edge roughness , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  James W. Taylor,et al.  Correlation of atomic force microscopy sidewall roughness measurements with scanning electron microscopy line-edge roughness measurements on chemically amplified resists exposed by x-ray lithography , 1999 .

[11]  Mike V. Williamson,et al.  Lithographic performance of thin dendritic polymer resists , 2000 .

[12]  Shigeru Moriya,et al.  Edge roughness evaluation method for quantifying at-size beam blur in electron-beam lithography , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Ki-Ho Baik,et al.  Lithographic Performances of Non-Chemically Amplified Resist and Chemically Amplified Resist for 193nm Top Surface Imaging Process , 2000 .

[14]  Man-Hyoung Ryoo,et al.  Control of line edge roughness of ultrathin resist films subjected to EUV exposure , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Qinghuang Lin,et al.  Toward controlled resist line-edge roughness: material origin of line-edge roughness in chemically amplified positive-tone resists , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Franco Cerrina,et al.  Depth dependence of resist line-edge roughness: Relation to photoacid diffusion length , 2002 .