Mild reactions to blood donation predict a decreased likelihood of donor return.

A growing body of evidence suggests that episodes of fainting can deter volunteer blood donors from returning to donate in the future. In contrast, relatively little is known about the effect of significantly more common mild reactions (e.g., faintness, dizziness, lightheadedness) on donor retention. In the present study, 1052 volunteer blood donors completed a standardized measure of subjective physiological reactions immediately after blood donation (Blood Donation Reactions Inventory), and individual scores were used to predict repeat donation behavior during a one-year follow-up. Results of a logistic regression analysis indicated that higher scores on the Blood Donation Reactions Inventory were associated with a significantly lower likelihood of repeat donation, and that novice donors who scored highest on the scale were less than half as likely to have returned to donate in the following year. These findings suggest that the Blood Donation Reactions Inventory is an effective method of assessing reactions that predict donor non-return, and therefore may be a useful addition to future studies aimed at enhancing donor satisfaction and retention.

[1]  D. Kaloupek,et al.  Coping with a stressful medical procedure: Further investigation with volunteer blood donors , 1985, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[2]  J. Piliavin,et al.  Why do they give the gift of life? A review of research on blood donors since 1977 , 1990, Transfusion.

[3]  B. Newman,et al.  A study of 178 consecutive vasovagal syncopal reactions from the perspective of safety , 2001, Transfusion.

[4]  D. Gregorio,et al.  An Estimate of Blood Donor Eligibility in the General Population , 1988, Vox sanguinis.

[5]  T. Akabane,et al.  Vasovagal Reactions in Blood Donors , 1980, Transfusion.

[6]  L. M. Peterson,et al.  Predicting vasovagal reactions in volunteer blood donors. , 1996, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[7]  C. France,et al.  Caffeine attenuates vasovagal reactions in female first-time blood donors. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[8]  T. Simon Where have all the donors gone? A personal reflection on the crisis in America's volunteer blood program , 2003, Transfusion.

[9]  S. Glynn,et al.  First‐time blood donors: demographic trends , 2001, Transfusion.

[10]  G. W. Snedecor Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[11]  A. Williams,et al.  Retention of “safe” blood donors. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study , 1998, Transfusion.

[12]  L. A. Staallekker,et al.  A Dutch Blood Bank and Its Donors , 1980, Transfusion.

[13]  Kevin Watanabe,et al.  Analysis of donor return behavior , 1999 .

[14]  D. Kasprisin,et al.  Moderate and severe reactions in blood donors , 1992, Transfusion.

[15]  R. Cable,et al.  A case‐controlled multicenter study of vasovagal reactions in blood donors: influence of sex, age, donation status, weight, blood pressure, and pulse , 1999, Transfusion.

[16]  J. Piliavin,et al.  Donorism. (Book Reviews: Giving Blood. The Development of an Altruistic Identity.) , 1992 .

[17]  C. Nass,et al.  The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study (REDS): rationale and methods , 1995, Transfusion.