Swiftness and Intensity of Administrative Innovation Adoption: An Empirical Study of TQM in Information Systems

Considerable attention has been directed toward developing a more complete understanding of innovation adoption by Information Systems (IS) departments. Much of this research has focused on the adoption of technological innovations, and limited research has focused on the adoption of administrative innovations. This paper focuses on an administrative innovation that is increasingly becoming popular among IS departments, namely Total Quality Management (TQM) in systems development. A synthesis of the IS innovation and TQM literatures was conducted to identify environmental, organizational, and task-related factors that should relate to both the swiftness and the intensity of TQM adoption. The relationships between the identified variables and TQM adoption were examined using data collected from 123 IS departments in Fortune 1000 firms and large government agencies in the U.S. The results indicate that TQM adoption in systems development is influenced by the host organization's quality orientation and factors internal to the IS department including IS management support for quality, the presence of a separate quality assurance function, and the structural complexity of the IS department. Implications of this study for theory, future research, and practice are discussed.

[1]  Jayant V. Saraph,et al.  An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management , 1989 .

[2]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Total Quality Management in Information Systems Development: Key Constructs and Relationships , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  J. Singer,et al.  QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY Modeling the Days of Our Lives: Using Survival Analysis When Designing and Analyzing Longitudinal Studies of Duration and the Timing of Events , 1991 .

[4]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[5]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[6]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[7]  Edward J. Kane.  Implementing TQM at dun & bradstreet software , 1992 .

[8]  R. Duncan.  Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[9]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[10]  J. Hage,et al.  Program Change and Organizational Properties a Comparative Analysis , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Madeline Weiss,et al.  Empowerment: Key to IS World-Class Quality , 1992, MIS Q..

[12]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[13]  Jim Q. Chen,et al.  Analysis of the total quality management-based software auditing , 1998 .

[14]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Quality Management in Systems Development: An Organizational System Perspective , 2000, MIS Q..

[15]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[16]  David A. Waldman,et al.  THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT TO A THEORY OF WORK PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[17]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems innovation among organizations , 1994 .

[18]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Information Centers as Organizational Innovation: Exploring the Correlates of Implementation Success , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  William D. Perreault,et al.  A Conceptual Paradigm and Approach for the Study of Innovators , 1981 .

[20]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[21]  Arun Rai,et al.  Propagating CASE usage for software development: An empirical investigation of key organizational correlates , 1994 .

[22]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Success of Customer-Oriented Strategic Systems , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[24]  P. Attewell.  Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[25]  Sanjay L. Ahire,et al.  Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs , 1996 .

[26]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  Does Implementing an Effective TQM Program Actually Improve Operating Performance? Empirical Evidence from Firms That Have Won Quality Awards , 1997 .

[27]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  Quality information systems: a unifying framework , 1998 .

[28]  R. Zmud.  An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[29]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[30]  H. Cooper,et al.  A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires , 1983 .

[31]  John C. Anderson,et al.  A Path Analytic Model of a Theory of Quality Management Underlying the Deming Management Method: Preliminary Empirical Findings* , 1995 .

[32]  Arun Rai,et al.  A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organizations , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  The quality approach: is it delivering? , 1997, CACM.

[35]  Richard W. Scamell,et al.  The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base development environment , 1990 .

[36]  Richard E. Zultner,et al.  TQM for technical teams , 1993, CACM.

[37]  M. Fennell,et al.  Synergy, influence, and information in the adoption of administrative innovations. , 1984, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[38]  R. Zmud.  Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[39]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[40]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[41]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  F. McFarlan,et al.  The information archipelago--plotting a course. , 1983, Harvard business review.

[43]  R. Daft.  A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[44]  R. Schroeder,et al.  A THEORY OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT UNDERLYING THE DEMING MANAGEMENT METHOD , 1994 .

[45]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The Impact of the Environment on the Management of Information Systems , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[47]  Judy Bayer,et al.  A critique of diffusion theory as a managerial framework for understanding adoption of software engineering innovations , 1989, [1988] Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software track.

[48]  William R. King,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Varun Grover,et al.  Empirical Evidence on Swanson's Tri-Core Model of Information Systems Innovation , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..