Transition towards a new global change science: Requirements for methodologies, methods, data and knowledge

Abstract Dealing with the challenges of global change requires a transition not only in society but also in the scientific community. Despite continued claims for more inter-disciplinary approaches, progress to date has been slow. This paper elaborates on the need for innovation in methodologies and knowledge, on the one hand, and methods and data, on the other, to build the foundations for dealing with the challenges from global change. Three questions related to the nature of global change, the dynamics of sustainability transitions and the role of human agency guide analyses on the state of the art, barriers for innovation and need for action. The analyses build on literature reviews, expert workshops and surveys which were conducted under the umbrella of RESCUE, a foresight activity funded by the European Science Foundation. The major recommendations focus on integrating environmental and human dimensions, bridging scales, data and knowledge for global change research and overcoming structural constraints to make global change research more policy relevant.

[1]  Oran R. Young,et al.  Building Regimes for Socioecological Systems: Institutional Diagnostics , 2008 .

[2]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Social-ecological resilience and socio-technical transitions: critical issues for sustainability governance , 2008 .

[3]  S. Shackley,et al.  Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority , 1996 .

[4]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery , 2009 .

[5]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  A Collaboratively-Derived Science-Policy Research Agenda , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  E. Ostrom.  A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Ash Amin,et al.  Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe , 1995 .

[8]  W. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[9]  R. Scholz.  Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions , 2011 .

[10]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .

[11]  A. Sherbinin.  The biophysical and geographical correlates of child malnutrition in Africa , 2011 .

[12]  A. Underdal.  Determining the Causal Significance of Institutions: Accomplishments and Challenges , 2008 .

[13]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  A Transition Research Perspective on Governance for Sustainability , 2011 .

[14]  W. Reid,et al.  Earth System Research Priorities , 2009, Science.

[15]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Keep it complex , 2010, Nature.

[16]  M. Betsill,et al.  Agency in earth system governance: refining a research agenda , 2011 .

[17]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[18]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[20]  D. Sprinz.  Long-Term Environmental Policy: Definition, Knowledge, Future Research , 2009, Global Environmental Politics.

[21]  T. Moss.  The governance of land use in river basins: prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU Water Framework Directive , 2004 .

[22]  Robert S. Chen,et al.  Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis , 2005 .

[23]  Marc A. Levy,et al.  Child hunger in the developing world: An analysis of environmental and social correlates , 2005 .

[24]  Household Lifestyles: Ideas for a Research Program , 2003 .

[25]  Eric Rignot,et al.  The Copenhagen Diagnosis: Updating the World on the Latest Climate Science , 2011 .

[26]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Adaptive and integrated water management , 2008 .

[28]  Stefano Balbi,et al.  Agent-Based Modelling of Socio-Ecosystems: A Methodology for the Analysis of Adaptation to Climate Change , 2010, Int. J. Agent Technol. Syst..

[29]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. , 2010 .

[30]  B. Wynne.  Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. , 1992 .

[31]  Andrew Webster,et al.  Crossing Boundaries Social Science in the Policy Room , 2007 .

[32]  Georg Holtz,et al.  The NeWater Management and Transition Framework — state and development process — , 2008 .

[33]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[34]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[35]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[36]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the Management and Transition Framework , 2010 .

[37]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes , 2009 .

[38]  S. Moss,et al.  Agent-based integrated assessment modelling: the example of climate change , 2001 .

[39]  William B. Gail,et al.  The emerging science of environmental applications , 2009, The Fourth Paradigm.

[40]  Ricardo J. Caballero,et al.  Macroeconomics after the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome , 2010 .

[41]  Robert J Lempert,et al.  A new decision sciences for complex systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Danny P. Wallace.  Knowledge Management: Historical and Cross-Disciplinary Themes , 2007 .

[43]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for transition modelling , 2008 .

[44]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[45]  H. J. Schellnhuber,et al.  ‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution , 1999, Nature.

[46]  D. Loorbach.  Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[47]  Louise J. Bracken,et al.  ‘What do you mean?’ The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research , 2006 .