Effect of Actin Organization on the Stiffness of Living Breast Cancer Cells Revealed by Peak-Force Modulation Atomic Force Microscopy.

We study the correlation between cytoskeleton organization and stiffness of three epithelial breast cancer cells lines with different degrees of malignancy: MCF-10A (healthy), MCF-7 (tumorigenic/noninvasive), and MDA-MB-231 (tumorigenic/invasive). Peak-force modulation atomic force microscopy is used for high-resolution topography and stiffness imaging of actin filaments within living cells. In healthy cells, local stiffness is maximum where filamentous actin is organized as well-aligned stress fibers, resulting in apparent Young's modulus values up to 1 order of magnitude larger than those in regions where these structures are not observed, but these organized actin fibers are barely observed in tumorigenic cells. We further investigate cytoskeleton conformation in the three cell lines by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy. The combination of both techniques determines that actin stress fibers are present at apical regions of healthy cells, while in tumorigenic cells they appear only at basal regions, where they cannot contribute to stiffness as probed by atomic force microscopy. These results substantiate that actin stress fibers provide a dominant contribution to stiffness in healthy cells, while the elasticity of tumorigenic cells appears not predominantly determined by these structures. We also discuss the effects of the high-frequency indentations inherent to peak-force atomic force microscopy for the identification of mechanical cancer biomarkers. Whereas conventional low loading rate indentations (1 Hz) result in slightly differentiated average stiffness for each cell line, in high-frequency measurements (250 Hz) healthy cells are clearly discernible from both tumorigenic cells with an enhanced stiffness ratio; however, the two cancerous cell lines produced indistinguishable results.

[1]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  M. Sakai Time-dependent viscoelastic relation between load and penetration for an axisymmetric indenter , 2002 .

[3]  D. Müller,et al.  Multiparametric imaging of biological systems by force-distance curve–based AFM , 2013, Nature Methods.

[4]  Shusen Xie,et al.  Elasticity measurement of breast cancer cells by atomic force microscopy , 2014, Other Conferences.

[5]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Mechanotransduction gone awry , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction , 2003, Annals of medicine.

[7]  C Rotsch,et al.  Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Celine Elie-Caille,et al.  Glyphosate-induced stiffening of HaCaT keratinocytes, a Peak Force Tapping study on living cells. , 2012, Journal of structural biology.

[9]  Teng Li,et al.  A mechanics model of microtubule buckling in living cells. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Richard S. Chadwick,et al.  Determination of the elastic moduli of thin samples and adherent cells using conical AFM tips , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[11]  S. Suresh,et al.  Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials , 2003, Nature materials.

[12]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  Guillaume Charras,et al.  Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis. , 2012, Trends in cell biology.

[15]  M. Ferrari,et al.  What does physics have to do with cancer? , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[16]  Harry Heinzelmann,et al.  Increased plasticity of the stiffness of melanoma cells correlates with their acquisition of metastatic properties. , 2014, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[17]  Patrice Soumillion,et al.  Multiparametric atomic force microscopy imaging of single bacteriophages extruding from living bacteria , 2013, Nature Communications.

[18]  Z. Stachura,et al.  Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[19]  Simon Scheuring,et al.  Structural, mechanical, and dynamical variability of the actin cortex in living cells. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[20]  E. Nauman,et al.  Mapping nanomechanical properties of live cells using multi-harmonic atomic force microscopy. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[21]  C. Lim,et al.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[22]  Chwee Teck Lim,et al.  Experimental techniques for single cell and single molecule biomechanics , 2006 .

[23]  Pekka Lappalainen,et al.  Actin stress fibers – assembly, dynamics and biological roles , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[24]  Muhammad H Zaman,et al.  How changes in cell mechanical properties induce cancerous behavior. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[25]  Masoud Agah,et al.  The effects of cancer progression on the viscoelasticity of ovarian cell cytoskeleton structures. , 2012, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[26]  C. Sawyers The cancer biomarker problem , 2008, Nature.

[27]  Emad Moeendarbary,et al.  Cell mechanics: principles, practices, and prospects , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[28]  D. Weitz,et al.  Control of non-linear elasticity in F-actin networks with microtubules , 2011 .

[29]  Ian M Thompson,et al.  Nanomechanical biomarkers of single circulating tumor cells for detection of castration resistant prostate cancer , 2014, The Prostate.

[30]  Christopher S. Poultney,et al.  A physical sciences network characterization of non-tumorigenic and metastatic cells , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[31]  M. Lekka,et al.  Depth-sensing analysis of cytoskeleton organization based on AFM data , 2011, European Biophysics Journal.

[32]  Arvind Raman,et al.  Local viscoelastic properties of live cells investigated using dynamic and quasi-static atomic force microscopy methods. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Nanomechanical mapping of soft matter by bimodal force microscopy , 2013 .

[34]  M. Lekka,et al.  Cancer cell recognition--mechanical phenotype. , 2012, Micron.

[35]  V. Yadavalli,et al.  Morphological and mechanical imaging of Bacillus cereus spore formation at the nanoscale , 2015, Journal of microscopy.

[36]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Comparison of mechanical properties of normal and malignant thyroid cells. , 2012, Micron.

[37]  M. Dokukin,et al.  On the Measurements of Rigidity Modulus of Soft Materials in Nanoindentation Experiments at Small Depth , 2012 .

[38]  F. Rico,et al.  Structural and mechanical heterogeneity of the erythrocyte membrane reveals hallmarks of membrane stability. , 2013, ACS nano.

[39]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Dynamic atomic force microscopy methods , 2002 .

[40]  J. Rao,et al.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[41]  Arvind Raman,et al.  Fast, multi-frequency, and quantitative nanomechanical mapping of live cells using the atomic force microscope , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[42]  Simon Scheuring,et al.  Nanomechanical characterization of the stiffness of eye lens cells: a pilot study. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  Z. Hall Cancer , 1906, The Hospital.

[44]  V. Svetlic̆ić,et al.  QUANTITATIVE NANOMECHANICAL MAPPING OF MARINE DIATOM IN SEAWATER USING PEAK FORCE TAPPING ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY 1 , 2012, Journal of phycology.

[45]  Zbigniew Stachura,et al.  Cancer cell detection in tissue sections using AFM. , 2012, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[46]  J. Latgé,et al.  High-resolution imaging of chemical and biological sites on living cells using peak force tapping atomic force microscopy. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[47]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Illuminating human health through cell mechanics. , 2013, Swiss medical weekly.

[48]  Kevin D Costa,et al.  Atomic force microscopy in mechanobiology: measuring microelastic heterogeneity of living cells. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[49]  Franziska Wetzel,et al.  are biomechanical changes necessary for tumour , 2010 .

[50]  Nataliia Guz,et al.  If cell mechanics can be described by elastic modulus: study of different models and probes used in indentation experiments. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[51]  F. Besenbacher,et al.  Quantitative biomolecular imaging by dynamic nanomechanical mapping. , 2014, Chemical Society reviews.

[52]  Kristina Haase,et al.  Investigating cell mechanics with atomic force microscopy , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[53]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Comparison of the viscoelastic properties of cells from different kidney cancer phenotypes measured with atomic force microscopy , 2013, Nanotechnology.

[54]  A. Bausch,et al.  Viscoelasticity of isotropically cross-linked actin networks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[55]  B. Helmke,et al.  A spatial approach to transcriptional profiling: mechanotransduction and the focal origin of atherosclerosis. , 1999, Trends in biotechnology.

[56]  D. Weitz,et al.  An active biopolymer network controlled by molecular motors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  F. Besenbacher,et al.  Hydrated human corneal stroma revealed by quantitative dynamic atomic force microscopy at nanoscale. , 2014, ACS nano.

[58]  Chwee Teck Lim,et al.  Connections between single-cell biomechanics and human disease states: gastrointestinal cancer and malaria. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[59]  Andreas Janshoff,et al.  Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines , 2014, Open Biology.