Ultimate and accidental limit state design for mooring systems of floating offshore wind turbines

The paper deals with the catenary mooring system design for tri-floater floating offshore wind turbines. Both ultimate (ULS) and accidental (ALS) limit states are examined, under 50 and 1 year return period environmental loads. Both power production and parked wind turbine conditions are analysed; for the former the ULS is applied, for the latter both ULS and ALS are considered. The platform static demand is assessed in terms of turbine thrust, wind, current and wave steady drift forces. The dynamic offset is determined considering both wave and low-frequency motions. Mooring patterns with 6, 9 and 12 chain cable and steel wire rope lines are considered. Water depth incidence is examined in the range between 50 and 300 m and the mooring system is dimensioned so that the relevant weight is determined. The Dutch tri-floater is assumed as reference structure and three candidate sites in the Southern Mediterranean Sea are considered. It is found that platform admissible offset and line pattern significantly influence the mooring system weight; obtained results show that 9 and 12 line configurations are the necessary choice and the mooring line weight is independent of water depth between 100 and 200 m, while increases out of this range.

[1]  Ivar Fylling,et al.  WINDOPT: An Optimization Tool for Floating Support Structures for Deep Water Wind Turbines , 2011 .

[2]  Subrata K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Handbook of Offshore Engineering , 2005 .

[3]  J. Pinkster.  Low frequency second order wave exciting forces on floating structures , 1980 .

[4]  Michael Muskulus,et al.  Mooring System Optimization for Floating Wind Turbines using Frequency Domain Analysis , 2012 .

[5]  C. F. Ratto,et al.  Evaluation of the offshore wind potential along the Italian coasts , 2006 .

[6]  Michael Selwyn Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The mean forces exerted by waves on floating or submerged bodies with applications to sand bars and wave power machines , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  A. Pantaleo,et al.  Feasibility study of off-shore wind farms: an application to Puglia region , 2005 .

[8]  Matthew Hall,et al.  Hydrodynamics-based floating wind turbine support platform optimization: A basis function approach , 2014 .

[9]  Hajime Maruo,et al.  The Drift of a Body Floating on Waves , 1960 .

[10]  T. Sarpkaya,et al.  Mechanics of wave forces on offshore structures , 1981 .

[11]  Sandy Butterfield,et al.  Feasibility of Floating Platform Systems for Wind Turbines: Preprint , 2004 .

[12]  R C MacCamy,et al.  Wave forces on piles: a diffraction theory , 1954 .

[13]  V. Piscopo,et al.  Mooring Control of Semi-submersible Structures for Wind Turbines☆ , 2014 .

[14]  J. Jonkman,et al.  Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development , 2009 .

[15]  Maurizio Collu,et al.  Preliminary design of a floating support structure for a 5 MW offshore wind turbine , 2012 .

[16]  Nigel Barltrop,et al.  Floating structures: a guide for design and analysis , 1998 .

[17]  Luca Cavallaro,et al.  Feasibility of an Offshore Wind Farm in the Gulf of Gela: Marine and Structural Issues , 2010 .

[18]  Guido Benassai,et al.  A sustainability index for offshore wind farms and open water aquaculture , 2011, CP 2011.

[19]  Odd M. Faltinsen,et al.  Sea loads on ships and offshore structures , 1990 .

[20]  Thomas Henry Havelock,et al.  The pressure of water waves upon a fixed obstacle , 1940, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[21]  A. Speranza,et al.  Offshore wind climatology over the Mediterranean basin , 2006 .