Turkish grade 10 students' and science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A national study

This study aimed to assess grade 10 Turkish students' and science teachers' conceptions of nature of science (NOS) and whether these conceptions were related to selected variables. These variables included participants' gender, geographical region, and the socioeconomic status (SES) of their city and region; teacher disciplinary background, years of teaching experience, graduate degree, and type of teacher training program; and student household SES and parents' educational level. A stratified sampling approach was used to generate a representative national sample comprising 2,087 students and 378 science teachers. After establishing their validity in the Turkish context, participants were administered a questionnaire comprising 14 modified “Views on Science-Technology-Society” (VOSTS) items to assess their views of certain aspects of NOS. A total of 2,020 students (97%) and 362 teachers (96%) completed the questionnaire. Participant responses were categorized as “naive,” “have merit,” or “informed,” and the frequency distributions for these responses were compared for various groupings of participants. The majority of participants held naive views of a majority of the target NOS aspects. Teacher views were mostly similar to those of their students. Teacher and student views of some NOS aspects were related to some of the target variables. These included teacher graduate degree and geographical region, and student household SES, parent education, and SES of their city and geographical region. The relationship between student NOS views and enhanced economic and educational capitals of their households, as well as the SES status of their cities and geographical regions point to significant cultural (specifically Western) and intellectual underpinnings of understandings about NOS. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 45: 1083–1112, 2008

[1]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick,et al.  An Exploratory Study of the Knowledge Base for Science Teaching , 1997 .

[2]  Lawrence C. Scharmann.  Locus of control: A discriminator of the ability to foster an understanding of the nature of science among preservice elementary teachers , 1988 .

[3]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding and Teaching of Nature of Science: An Intervention Study , 2001 .

[4]  Lawrence C. Scharmann.  The influences of sequenced instructional strategy and locus of control on preservice elementary teachers' understanding of the nature of science , 1988 .

[5]  Jeffrey W. Bloom.  Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of science: science, theories and evolution* , 1989 .

[6]  Heidi Kass,et al.  Chemistry teachers' functional paradigms , 1987 .

[7]  Richard J. Bady.  Students' understanding of the logic of hypothesis testing , 1979 .

[8]  Reg Fleming.  High‐school graduates' beliefs about science‐technology‐society. II. the interaction among science, technology and society , 1987 .

[9]  Michael E. Beeth,et al.  Teaching for Conceptual Change , 1998 .

[10]  Deborah Pomeroy.  Implications of Teachers' Beliefs about the Nature of Science: Comparison of the Beliefs of Scientists, Secondary Science Teachers, and Elementary Teachers. , 1993 .

[11]  F. Ramsey,et al.  The statistical sleuth : a course in methods of data analysis , 2002 .

[12]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  Teachers' Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their Relationship to Classroom Practice , 1990 .

[13]  Sabahattin Deniz,et al.  Student teachers' attitudes concerning understanding the nature of science in Turkey , 2006 .

[14]  Grover Maxwell,et al.  The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities , 1962 .

[15]  Stephen Toulmin,et al.  The Fabric of the Heavens: The Development of Astronomy and Dynamics , 1979 .

[16]  George M. Bodner,et al.  The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints , 1992 .

[17]  Norman G. Lederman.  Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Science and Classroom Practice: Factors That Facilitate or Impede the Relationship. , 1999 .

[18]  Donald Gillies.  Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century: Four Central Themes , 1993 .

[19]  Nyles G. Stauss,et al.  An Analysis of Experienced Science Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Science , 1970 .

[20]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Tentativeness in Science: Development, Use, and Sources of Change. , 1990 .

[21]  David M. Moss,et al.  Examining student conceptions of the nature of science , 2001 .

[22]  Blythe McVicker Clinchy,et al.  Women s ways of knowing: The development of self , 1988 .

[23]  M. Ruse.  Philosophy of biology , 1998 .

[24]  Victoria Costa,et al.  When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science , 1995 .

[25]  Bruce B. King.  Beginning teachers' knowledge of and attitudes toward history and philosophy of science , 1991 .

[26]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  It's the nature of the beast: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science , 2002 .

[27]  M. Belenky,et al.  Women's ways of knowing : the development of self, voice, and mind , 1988 .

[28]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[29]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[30]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .

[31]  Sukjin Kang,et al.  Examining students' views on the nature of science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders , 2005 .

[32]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature , 2000 .

[33]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  The teaching of the philosophy of science in secondary classrooms: case studies of teachers’ personal theories , 1989 .

[34]  Judith E. Lanier.  Research on teacher education , 1984 .

[35]  Mekritt E. Kimball.  Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers , 1967 .

[36]  Alan G. Ryan,et al.  High‐school graduates' beliefs about science‐technology‐society. I. methods and issues in monitoring student views , 1987 .

[37]  G. Aikenhead.  High‐school graduates' beliefs about science‐technology‐society. III. Characteristics and limitations of scientific knowledge , 1987 .

[38]  Integrating Nature of Science Instruction into a Physical Science Content Course for Preservice Elementary Teachers: NOS Views of Teaching Assistants. , 2006 .

[39]  Victor Y. Billeh,et al.  Factors Affecting Teachers' Gain in Understanding the Nature of Science. , 1975 .

[40]  Jim Garrison,et al.  Realism, Deweyan Pragmatism, and Educational Research , 1994 .

[41]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades , 2008 .

[42]  A. Ryan,et al.  Students' Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science , 1992 .

[43]  E. Grant.  The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages: Their Religious, Institutional and Intellectual Contexts , 1996 .

[44]  W. G. Perry.  Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[45]  J. Gallagher,et al.  Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science , 1991 .

[46]  Uri Zoller,et al.  Students’ versus their teachers’ beliefs and positions on science/technology/society‐oriented issues. , 1991 .

[47]  Olugbemiro J. Jegede,et al.  Cross‐cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon , 1999 .

[48]  Timothy P. Mottet,et al.  Students and Teachers , 2009 .

[49]  G. Aikenhead,et al.  BOOK REVIEW , 2008 .

[50]  Nyles G. Stauss,et al.  An analysis of the understanding of the nature of science by prospective secondary science teachers , 1968 .

[51]  Abdullateef H. Haidar,et al.  Emirates pre-service and in-service teachers' views about the nature of science , 1999 .

[52]  Hassan H. Tairab.  How do Pre-service and In-service Science Teachers View the Nature of Science and Technology? , 2001 .

[53]  D. Hodson.  Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children's understanding of science: Some preliminary findings , 1993 .

[54]  R. Olstad.  The effect of science teaching methods on the understanding of science , 1969 .

[55]  J. F. Lavach.  Organization and Evaluation of an In-Service Program in the History of Science. , 1969 .

[56]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[57]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[58]  Mansoor Niaz.  From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: A rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks , 1998 .

[59]  D. J. Montgomery,et al.  The architecture of matter , 1962 .

[60]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick.  Over And Over And Over Again: College Students' Views Of Nature Of Science , 2006 .

[61]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Just do it? impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2003 .

[62]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  A case study of high school teachers' decision making models for planning and teaching science , 1989 .

[63]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Embedding Nature of Science Instruction in Preservice Elementary Science Courses: Abandoning Scientism, But... , 2001 .

[64]  Jon Ogborn,et al.  Philosophy of science: an empirical study of teachers’ views , 1989 .

[65]  Reg Fleming.  Undergraduate science students' views on the relationship between Science, Technology and Society , 1988 .

[66]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural , 1998 .

[67]  B. Blunden.  It’s the Nature of the Beast , 2004 .

[68]  A. Ryan,et al.  The Development of a New Instrument: "Views on Science- Technology-Society" (VOSTS) , 1992 .

[69]  Lindsay D. Mackay,et al.  Development of understanding about the nature of science , 1971 .

[70]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-Based Approach on Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science , 2000 .

[71]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Developing and Acting Upon One's Conception of the Nature of Science: A Follow-Up Study. , 2000 .

[72]  Pinchas Tamir,et al.  Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena , 1991 .

[73]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick,et al.  Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science , 2004 .

[74]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Inquiry in science education: International perspectives , 2004 .

[75]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge , 1978 .

[76]  Michael L. Rutledge,et al.  Evolutionary Theory, the Nature of Science & High School Biology Teachers: Critical Relationships , 2000 .

[77]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick,et al.  Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth‐grade teacher , 2003 .

[78]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick.  Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: the impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning , 2005 .

[79]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[80]  Serhat Irez,et al.  Are we prepared? : An assessment of preservice science teacher educators' beliefs about nature of science , 2006 .

[81]  R. Wood.  University Education Student's Understanding of the Nature and Processes of Science , 1970 .

[82]  Alan G. Ryan.  High-School Graduates' Beliefs about Science-Technology-Society. IV. The Characteristics of Scientists. , 1987 .