A minimum‐impact, flexible tool to study vocal communication of small animals with precise individual‐level resolution

1.To understand both proximate and ultimate factors shaping vocal communication, it is fundamental to obtain reliable information of participating individuals on different levels: Firstly, it is necessary to separate and assign the individuals’ vocalisations. Secondly, the precise timing of vocal events needs to be retained. Thirdly, vocal behaviour should be recorded from undisturbed animals in meaningful settings. A growing number of studies used animal-attached microphones to tackle these issues, but the implications for the study species and the research question often receded into the background. Here we aim to initiate a discussion about the limitations, possible applications and the broader potential of such methods. 2.Using lightweight wireless microphone backpacks (0.75 g including customised leg-loop harness) combined with multi-channel recording equipment we captured vocal behaviour of small songbirds. We evaluated the effect of the devices at various levels, including an assessment of how vocal and locomotor activities were affected by initial device attachment and battery exchange. We compared our approach to existing studies and identified suitable research examples. 3.We acquired continuous vocalisation recordings of zebra finches, and unequivocally assigned them to interacting individuals, with system-based synchrony, irrespective of background noise. We found effects of initial backpack attachment and of battery replacement on vocal and locomotor activity, but they were minimised through the extended recording duration (ca. 16 days) that outlasted habituation effects (ca. 3 days). 4.This method provides the tools to integrate individual vocal communications into a group setting, while enabling animals to behave freely in undisturbed, structured and acoustically complex environments. By minimising the effects on the animals, the behaviour under study, and ultimately on the research question, this approach will revolutionize the ability to capture individual-level vocalisations in a variety of communication contexts, opening up many new opportunities to address novel research questions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  J. R. Clemmons,et al.  Development of Early Vocalizations and the Chick-a-dee Call in the Black-capped Chickadee, Parus atricapillus , 2010 .

[2]  Hiroshi Riquimaroux,et al.  On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  Singing direction as a tool to investigate the function of birdsong: an experiment on sedge warblers , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Trends and perspectives in animal‐attached remote sensing , 2005 .

[5]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  Excess Baggage for Birds: Inappropriate Placement of Tags on Gannets Changes Flight Patterns , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  SEEWAVE, A FREE MODULAR TOOL FOR SOUND ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS , 2008 .

[7]  Simon C. Griffith,et al.  Vocal communication at the nest between mates in wild zebra finches: a private vocal duet? , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Hannes Sagunsky,et al.  Zebra Finch Mates Use Their Forebrain Song System in Unlearned Call Communication , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Christopher C Wilmers,et al.  The golden age of bio-logging: how animal-borne sensors are advancing the frontiers of ecology. , 2015, Ecology.

[10]  L. Ratcliffe,et al.  Honest advertisement and song output during the dawn chorus of black-capped chickadees , 1997 .

[11]  Denis Réale,et al.  Spying on small wildlife sounds using affordable collar-mounted miniature microphones: an innovative method to record individual daylong vocalisations in chipmunks , 2015, Scientific reports.

[12]  Amiyaal Ilany,et al.  The energy cost of singing in wild rock hyrax males: evidence for an index signal , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  N. McIntyre,et al.  Effects of Radiotransmitter Necklaces on Behaviors of Adult Male Western Burrowing Owls , 2007 .

[14]  Iris I. Levin,et al.  Performance of Encounternet Tags: Field Tests of Miniaturized Proximity Loggers for Use on Small Birds , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  Mark P. Johnson,et al.  Studying the behaviour and sensory ecology of marine mammals using acoustic recording tags: a review , 2009 .

[16]  John P. Croxall,et al.  EFFECTS OF SATELLITE TRANSMITTERS ON ALBATROSSES AND PETRELS , 2003 .

[17]  M. Burgess,et al.  An experimental evaluation of the effects of geolocator design and attachment method on between-year survival on Whinchats Saxicola rubetra , 2016 .

[18]  Andries Ter Maat,et al.  A lightweight telemetry system for recording neuronal activity in freely behaving small animals , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  A. Radford,et al.  Close calling regulates spacing between foraging competitors in the group-living pied babbler , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Kimberly S. Bostwick,et al.  High-speed video analysis of wing-snapping in two manakin clades (Pipridae: Aves) , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  T. McIntyre,et al.  Animal telemetry: Tagging effects. , 2015, Science.

[22]  M. Gahr,et al.  Repertoire and structure of duet and solo songs in cooperatively breeding white-browed sparrow weavers , 2006 .

[23]  H. Akaike Statistical predictor identification , 1970 .

[24]  G. Gauthier,et al.  Is pre-breeding prospecting behaviour affected by snow cover in the irruptive snowy owl? A test using state-space modelling and environmental data annotated via Movebank , 2015, Movement ecology.

[25]  C. J. Pennycuick,et al.  The effect of an external transmitter on the drag coefficient of a bird’s body, and hence on migration range, and energy reserves after migration , 2011, Journal of Ornithology.

[26]  Wolfgang Goymann,et al.  Patterns of call communication between group-housed zebra finches change during the breeding cycle , 2015, eLife.

[27]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  When three per cent may not be three per cent; device-equipped seabirds experience variable flight constraints , 2012 .

[28]  Jeffrey D. Brawn,et al.  Meta‐analysis of transmitter effects on avian behaviour and ecology , 2010 .

[29]  Robert S Laramee,et al.  Prying into the intimate secrets of animal lives; software beyond hardware for comprehensive annotation in ‘Daily Diary’ tags , 2015, Movement ecology.

[30]  N. Mann,et al.  Antiphonal four-part synchronized chorusing in a Neotropical wren , 2006, Biology Letters.

[31]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Measuring devices on wild animals: what constitutes acceptable practice? , 2006 .

[32]  P. Karell,et al.  Is the denser contour feather structure in pale grey than in pheomelanic brown tawny owls Strix aluco an adaptation to cold environments , 2016 .

[33]  M. Abeles Quantification, smoothing, and confidence limits for single-units' histograms , 1982, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[34]  D. Todt,et al.  FACING THE RIVAL: DIRECTIONAL SINGING BEHAVIOUR IN NIGHTINGALES , 2003 .

[35]  Animal Communication: Timing Counts , 2007, Current Biology.

[36]  Arjan Boonman,et al.  On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Marta B Manser,et al.  Moving calls: a vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  T. Pärt,et al.  Effect of Geolocators on Migration and Subsequent Breeding Performance of a Long-Distance Passerine Migrant , 2013, PLoS ONE.

[39]  R. Zann Structural Variation in the Zebra Finch Distance Call , 1984 .

[40]  P. Quillfeldt,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Handling and Logger Attachment on Foraging Parameters and Physiology in Southern Rockhopper Penguins , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  Richard Hans Robert Hahnloser,et al.  Reconstruction of vocal interactions in a group of small songbirds , 2014, Nature Methods.

[42]  H. Brumm The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004 .

[43]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[44]  M. Gahr,et al.  Tap dancing birds: the multimodal mutual courtship display of males and females in a socially monogamous songbird , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[45]  P. Tyack,et al.  Using accelerometers to determine the calling behavior of tagged baleen whales , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[46]  M. Manser,et al.  Banded mongoose recruitment calls convey information about risk and not stimulus type , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  Christophe O. Soulage,et al.  The acoustic expression of stress in a songbird: Does corticosterone drive isolation-induced modifications of zebra finch calls? , 2012, Hormones and Behavior.