Clinical activity and safety of the dual pathway inhibitor rigosertib for higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes following DNA methyltransferase inhibitor therapy

Rigosertib (ON 01910.Na) is an inhibitor of the phosphoinositide 3‐kinase and polo‐like kinase pathways that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis in neoplastic cells, while sparing normal cells. Our purpose is to summarize the clinical activity and safety of intravenous (IV) rigosertib delivered by an external ambulatory infusion pump in patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts‐1, ‐2, or, ‐t myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) following prior treatment with DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors. A total of 39 patients with MDS who fulfilled these criteria were enrolled in four phase 1‐2 clinical trials of IV rigosertib. Thirty five (88%) had higher risk disease according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System. Median overall survival for this group of 39 patients was 35 weeks. Of 30 evaluable patients with follow‐up bone marrow biopsies, 12 (40%) achieved complete (n = 5) or partial (n = 7) bone marrow blast responses. In addition, 15 patients achieved stabilization of bone marrow blasts. One patient with a complete bone marrow response also achieved a complete cytogenetic response. A second patient with stable bone marrow blasts achieved a partial cytogenetic response. Two of the responding patients and three patients with stable disease had hematological improvements. Rigosertib‐induced bone marrow blast decreases and stability appeared to be predictive of prolonged survival. IV rigosertib had a favorable safety profile without significant myelosuppression. Most common drug‐related toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, dysuria, and hematuria. In summary, IV rigosertib is well tolerated and has clinical activity in patients with higher risk MDS following DNMT inhibitor treatment. A multinational pivotal phase 3 randomized clinical trial of rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with MDS with excess blasts following prior treatment with DNMT inhibitors (ONTIME: ON 01910.Na Trial In Myelodysplastic SyndromE) has recently completed enrollment. © 2014 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Voso,et al.  Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) predicts survival and leukemic evolution of myelodysplastic syndromes significantly better than IPSS and WHO Prognostic Scoring System: validation by the Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie Italian Regional Database. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  J. Bennett,et al.  A multivariate analysis of the relationship between response and survival among patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated within azacitidine or conventional care regimens in the randomized AZA-001 trial , 2013, Haematologica.

[3]  J. Vardiman The classification of MDS: from FAB to WHO and beyond. , 2012, Leukemia research.

[4]  M. Laouri,et al.  Economic impact on US Medicare of a new diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes and the incremental costs associated with blood transfusion need , 2012, Transfusion.

[5]  Luca Malcovati,et al.  Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2012, Blood.

[6]  M. Konopleva,et al.  Clofarabine plus low‐dose cytarabine followed by clofarabine plus low‐dose cytarabine alternating with decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia frontline therapy for older patients , 2012, Cancer.

[7]  N. Young,et al.  Directed therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) by suppression of cyclin D1 with ON 01910.Na. , 2012, Leukemia research.

[8]  C. Steidl,et al.  New comprehensive cytogenetic scoring system for primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia after MDS derived from an international database merge. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  D. Felsher,et al.  Treatment of higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients unresponsive to hypomethylating agents with ON 01910.Na. , 2010, Leukemia research.

[10]  B. Esterni,et al.  Outcome of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome after azacitidine treatment failure. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  E. Reddy,et al.  Discovery of a clinical stage multi-kinase inhibitor sodium (E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-[(2',4',6'-trimethoxystyrylsulfonyl)methyl]phenylamino}acetate (ON 01910.Na): synthesis, structure-activity relationship, and biological activity. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  J. Maciejewski,et al.  A Phase 2 study of combination therapy with arsenic trioxide and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or secondary acute myeloid leukemia , 2011, Cancer.

[13]  J. Issa,et al.  Outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after failure of decitabine therapy , 2010, Cancer.

[14]  P. Fenaux,et al.  Review of azacitidine trials in Intermediate-2-and High-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2009, Leukemia research.

[15]  P. Greenberg,et al.  Single Cell Network Profiling (SCNP) to Evaluate the Mechanism of Action of ON 01910.Na, A Novel Clinical Trial Stage Compound. , 2009 .

[16]  S. Cosenza,et al.  Preclinical pharmacokinetics and in vitro activity of ON 01910.Na, a novel anti-cancer agent , 2009, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[17]  E. Reddy,et al.  Styryl sulfonyl compounds inhibit translation of cyclin D1 in mantle cell lymphoma cells , 2009, Oncogene.

[18]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Characteristics of US patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of six cross-sectional physician surveys. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  T. Haferlach,et al.  Definitions and standards in the diagnosis and treatment of the myelodysplastic syndromes: Consensus statements and report from a working conference. , 2007, Leukemia research.

[20]  J. Issa,et al.  Update of the decitabine experience in higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome and analysis of prognostic factors associated with outcome , 2007, Cancer.

[21]  B. Cheson,et al.  Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. , 2006, Blood.

[22]  Kiranmai Gumireddy,et al.  ON01910, a non-ATP-competitive small molecule inhibitor of Plk1, is a potent anticancer agent. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[23]  P. Fenaux Myelodysplastic syndromes: From pathogenesis and prognosis to treatment. , 2004, Seminars in hematology.

[24]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. , 2003, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[25]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Early blast clearance by remission induction therapy is a major independent prognostic factor for both achievement of complete remission and long-term outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: data from the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) 1992 Trial. , 2003, Blood.

[26]  T Hamblin,et al.  International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. , 1997, Blood.