Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data.

A number of algorithms have been proposed to model the adaptive behavior of bone under load. However, the predictions of several models have neither been compared nor have they been systematically related to in vivo data. To this end, the stress states of loaded implant-bone interfaces were analyzed before and after osseointegration using finite element (FE) techniques. In a preliminary step, an FE mesh of a cylindrical implant encased in a cancellous core surrounded by a cortical layer was constructed, and the stresses and strains that developed at the interface were determined. The implant was loaded with 100 N vertical and 30 N lateral loads. Using this structure, the peak compressive and tensile stresses were determined. Then bone remodeling predictions were assessed using three different models: von Mises equivalent strain, strain energy density and effective stress. Finally, a systematic search of the literature was conducted to relate the numerical predictions to existing in vivo data. The FE simulations led to the following conclusions: (1) calculated compressive stresses were lower than the ultimate compressive stresses of cortical and cancellous bone. (2) Calculated tensile stresses were generally superior to experimental data on the tensile strength of the bone-implant interface. (3) With one exception, the predictions of all models were homogeneously grouped on the stimulus scales. (4) The predictions of the models as to bone gain or loss were not consistent and at times contradictory. It is hypothesized that this effect is linked to a lazy zone that is too narrow. With respect to the application of the numerical models to in vivo data, peak strains and strain energy densities were consistent with in vivo data. No in vivo data were found that supported effective stress as a stimulus.

[1]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  H. Frost,et al.  Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  David B. Burr,et al.  Structure, Function, and Adaptation of Compact Bone , 1989 .

[4]  D R Sumner,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  Heng-Li Huang,et al.  An intra-oral hydraulic system for controlled loading of dental implants. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Trabecular bone density and loading history: regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  The adaptation of bone apparent density to applied load. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Stephen C. Cowin,et al.  Bone remodeling III: uniqueness and stability in adaptive elasticity theory , 1978 .

[10]  S. Cowin,et al.  Bone remodeling I: theory of adaptive elasticity , 1976 .

[11]  S. Cowin,et al.  Wolff's law of trabecular architecture at remodeling equilibrium. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  Dennis R. Carter,et al.  Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[13]  J. Wolff Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen , 1893 .

[14]  Hwj Rik Huiskes The law of adaptive bone remodeling : a case for crying Newton? , 1995 .

[15]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Stephen C. Cowin,et al.  Bone remodeling II: small strain adaptive elasticity , 1976 .

[17]  Friedrich Pauwels Eine neue Theorie über den Einfluß mechanischer Reize auf die Differenzierung der Stützgewebe , 1965 .

[18]  John B. Brunski,et al.  In Vivo Bone Response to Biomechanical Loading at the Bone/Dental-Implant Interface , 1999, Advances in dental research.

[19]  Hwj Rik Huiskes,et al.  A Computer-simulation Model Relating Bone-cell Metabolism to Mechanical Adaptation of Trabecular Architecture , 2001 .

[20]  J H Heegaard,et al.  Frictional interface micromotions and anisotropic stress distribution in a femoral total hip component. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  R. Brand,et al.  Toward an identification of mechanical parameters initiating periosteal remodeling: a combined experimental and analytic approach. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  R. Martin,et al.  The effects of geometric feedback in the development of osteoporosis. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  J. Galante,et al.  ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  N. Takahashi,et al.  Effect of a continuously applied compressive pressure on mouse osteoblast‐like cells (MC3T3‐E1) in vitro , 1990, Journal of cellular physiology.

[25]  I Naert,et al.  The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  P Aspenberg,et al.  Cartilage induction by controlled mechanical stimulation in vivo , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  D. C. Wirtz,et al.  Material properties of trabecular bone structures , 2002, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[28]  U. Belser,et al.  Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[29]  Friedrich Pauwels,et al.  Biomechanics of the Locomotor Apparatus , 1980 .

[30]  Dennis R. Carter,et al.  Mechanobiology of Skeletal Regeneration , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  R. Pidaparti,et al.  A uniform strain criterion for trabecular bone adaptation: do continuum-level strain gradients drive adaptation? , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  S C Cowin,et al.  Bone stress adaptation models. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[34]  G. Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[35]  F. Pauwels,et al.  [A new theory on the influence of mechanical stimuli on the differentiation of supporting tissue. The tenth contribution to the functional anatomy and causal morphology of the supporting structure]. , 1960, Zeitschrift fur Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte.

[36]  K. Tomita,et al.  Mechanical Stresses and Bone Formation , 1996 .

[37]  H. Frost The Laws of Bone Structure , 1965 .

[38]  A H Geering,et al.  Rationale for clinical application of different occlusal philosophies. , 1977, Oral sciences reviews.

[39]  L. Claes,et al.  Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Prediction of bone adaptation using damage accumulation. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  R. Pilliar,et al.  The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[42]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The Anisotropic Hooke's Law for Cancellous Bone and Wood , 1998, Journal Of Elasticity.

[43]  Z. Jaworski,et al.  Effect of long-term immobilisation on the pattern of bone loss in older dogs. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[44]  R. Martin,et al.  Bone structure and remodeling , 1996 .