A comparison of two methods of prompting in training discrimination of communication book pictures by autistic students
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Scheibel,et al. SYMBOL COMMUNICATION FOR THE MENTALLY HANDICAPPED. , 1975, Mental retardation.
[2] S. Striefel,et al. Acquisition and cross modal generalization of receptive and expressive signing skills in a retarded deaf girl. , 2008, Journal of mental deficiency research.
[3] S. Osler,et al. The biosocial basis of mental retardation , 1965 .
[4] C. M. Johnson. ERRORLESS LEARNING IN A MULTIHANDICAPPED ADOLESCENT1 , 1977 .
[5] D. Reid,et al. Teaching nonvocal communication skills to multihandicapped retarded adults. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[6] F. Billingsley,et al. Response Prompting and the Transfer of Stimulus Control: Methods, Research, and a Conceptual Framework , 1983 .
[7] D M Baer,et al. Teaching productive noun suffixes to severely retarded children. , 1973, American journal of mental deficiency.
[8] P. Touchette. The effects of graduated stimulus change on the acquisition of a simple discrimination in severely retarded boys. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[9] C. Musselwhite,et al. Communication Programming for the Severely Handicapped: Vocal and Non-Vocal Strategies , 1981 .
[10] M. Wolery,et al. A comparison of time delay and system of least prompts in teaching object identification. , 1987, Research in developmental disabilities.
[11] Murray Sidman,et al. Programming Perception and Learning for Retarded Children , 1966 .
[12] C. Kiernan. The use of nonvocal communication techniques with autistic individuals. , 1983, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.
[13] J. Halle,et al. Time delay: a technique to increase language use and facilitate generalization in retarded children. , 1979, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[14] P. Touchette,et al. Errorless learning: reinforcement contingencies and stimulus control transfer in delayed prompting. , 1984, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[15] Marg Csapo,et al. Comparison of Two Prompting Procedures to Increase Response Fluency among Severely Handicapped Learners , 1981 .
[16] D. Browder. Using Time Delay to Teach Manual Signs to a Severely Retarded Student. , 1981 .
[17] R. Gaylord-Ross,et al. Task difficulty and aberrant behavior in severely handicapped students. , 1981, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[18] D. Gast,et al. Applying Time Delay Procedure to the Instruction of the Severely Handicapped , 1981 .
[19] E. Carr,et al. Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. , 1985, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[20] D. Gast,et al. Teaching a Multihandicapped Adult Manual Signs Using a Constant Time Delay Procedure , 1981 .
[21] Sarah W. Blackstone,et al. Augmentative communication : an introduction , 1986 .
[22] Leija V. McReynolds,et al. Single-subject experimental designs in communicative disorders , 1983 .
[23] E. Konarski,et al. The "good behavior game": a systematic replication in two unruly transitional classrooms , 1978 .
[24] G. Karlan,et al. Establishing generalized verb-noun instruction-following skills in retarded children. , 1976, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[25] D. L. Bennett. Time Delay and System of Least Prompts: A Comparison in Teaching Manual Sign Production. , 1986 .
[26] K. Dyer,et al. The role of response delay in improving in the discrimination performance or autistic children. , 1982, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[27] H. Shane,et al. Election criteria for the adoption of an augmentative communication system: preliminary considerations. , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[28] L. Lloyd,et al. A survey of the use of non-speech systems with the severely communication impaired. , 1978, Mental retardation.