Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum

The field of specialization known as the science of learning is not, in fact, one field. Science of learning is a term that serves as an umbrella for many lines of research, theory, and application. A term with an even wider reach is Learning Sciences (Sawyer, 2006). The present book represents a sliver, albeit a substantial one, of the scholarship on the science of learning and its application in educational settings (Science of Instruction, Mayer 2011). Although much, but not all, of what is presented in this book is focused on learning in college and university settings, teachers of all academic levels may find the recommendations made by chapter authors of service. The overarching theme of this book is on the interplay between the science of learning, the science of instruction, and the science of assessment (Mayer, 2011). The science of learning is a systematic and empirical approach to understanding how people learn. More formally, Mayer (2011) defined the science of learning as the “scientific study of how people learn” (p. 3). The science of instruction (Mayer 2011), informed in part by the science of learning, is also on display throughout the book. Mayer defined the science of instruction as the “scientific study of how to help people learn” (p. 3). Finally, the assessment of student learning (e.g., learning, remembering, transferring knowledge) during and after instruction helps us determine the effectiveness of our instructional methods. Mayer defined the science of assessment as the “scientific study of how to determine what people know” (p.3). Most of the research and applications presented in this book are completed within a science of learning framework. Researchers first conducted research to understand how people learn in certain controlled contexts (i.e., in the laboratory) and then they, or others, began to consider how these understandings could be applied in educational settings. Work on the cognitive load theory of learning, which is discussed in depth in several chapters of this book (e.g., Chew; Lee and Kalyuga; Mayer; Renkl), provides an excellent example that documents how science of learning has led to valuable work on the science of instruction. Most of the work described in this book is based on theory and research in cognitive psychology. We might have selected other topics (and, thus, other authors) that have their research base in behavior analysis, computational modeling and computer science, neuroscience, etc. We made the selections we did because the work of our authors ties together nicely and seemed to us to have direct applicability in academic settings. Publication Date 2014 Publisher American Psychological Association Document Type Book Recommended Citation Benassi, V. A., Overson, C. E., & Hakala, C. M. (2014). Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum. Retrieved from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology web site: http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php  Download Find in your library SHARE PSYCHOLOGY SCHOLARSHIP SEARCH Enter search terms: Search in this series

[1]  W. Estes.  Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. , 1955, Psychological review.

[2]  H. Kay.  Teaching Machines , 1961, Nature.

[3]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[4]  John A. Glover,et al.  Influence of paraphrased repetitions on the spacing effect. , 1987 .

[5]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[6]  R. Bjork,et al.  Metacognition in motor learning. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Rereading Effects Depend on Time of Test. , 2005 .

[8]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[9]  H. Pashler,et al.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[11]  Doug Rohrer,et al.  The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning , 2007 .

[12]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The promise and perils of self-regulated study , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Edward Vul,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Spacing Effects in Learning A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention , 2022 .

[14]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  The Limited Benefits of Rereading Educational Texts. , 2009 .

[15]  R. Bjork,et al.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Nate Kornell,et al.  The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[17]  Lisa K. Fazio,et al.  Surprising feedback improves later memory , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  People's hypercorrection of high-confidence errors: did they know it all along? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Andrew C. Butler,et al.  A contextual framework for understanding when difficulties are desirable , 2011 .

[20]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: long-term improvements from quizzing. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[21]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Contextual interference: Generalizability and limitations , 2012 .

[22]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? , 2011, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[23]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Designing for Productive Failure , 2012 .

[24]  David B. Daniel.  Promising principles: Translating the science of learning to educational practice , 2012 .

[25]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Carole L. Yue,et al.  Reducing verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: An undesired desirable difficulty? , 2013 .

[27]  H. Pashler,et al.  Divided attention: An undesirable difficulty in memory retention , 2013, Memory & Cognition.

[28]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .

[29]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Learning Versus Performance , 2013, Perspectives on Psychological Science.

[30]  D. Schacter,et al.  Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.