Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict

Summary The increased use of teams in organizations, coupled with an increasingly diverse workforce, strongly suggests that we should learn more about how team diversity affects functioning and performance. The purpose of this study was to explore the differential impact of surface-level diversity (gender, ethnicity), deep-level diversity (time urgency, extraversion), and two moderating variables (team orientation, team process) on relationship conflict over time. Hypotheses were tested by tracking 45 student project teams in a longitudinal design. Results revealed that team orientation and team process moderated the diversity–conflict link. Specifically, team orientation helped to neutralize the negative effects of surface-level (gender) diversity on relationship conflict. In a similar manner, team processes worked to weaken the deleterious effects of deep-level diversity (time urgency) on relationship conflict. In addition, relationship conflict resulted in lower perceived performance by team members. Copyright # 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. A. Campion,et al.  The Knowledge, Skill, and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management , 1994 .

[2]  E. Salas,et al.  Collective Behavior and Team Performance , 1992 .

[3]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  The Effect Of Individual Perceptions of Deadlines on Team Performance , 2001 .

[4]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[5]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[6]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[7]  Jason D. Shaw,et al.  Interdependence and Preference for Group Work: Main and Congruence Effects on the Satisfaction and Performance of Group Members , 2000 .

[8]  G. Dobbins,et al.  Collectivistic orientation in teams: an individual and group-level analysis , 1997 .

[9]  G. Stewart,et al.  Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  P. Goodman.  Designing effective work groups , 1999 .

[11]  B. Lawrence.  The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[12]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Time urgency : conceptual and construct development , 1995 .

[13]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[14]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[15]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[16]  M. Turner.  GROUPS AT WORK: THEORY AND RESEARCH , 2002 .

[17]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[18]  E. Salas,et al.  Personality and group performance. , 1987 .

[19]  R. Peterson,et al.  7. A contingent configuration approach to understanding the role of personality in organizational groups , 2001 .

[20]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time , 1992 .

[21]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[22]  J. George,et al.  Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. , 1990 .

[23]  Peter Wright.  The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. , 1974 .

[24]  R. Golembiewski.  Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[25]  A. Bedeian,et al.  .05: A Case of the Tail Wagging the Distribution , 1989 .

[26]  M. Mount,et al.  Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance. , 1984 .

[27]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Creating high performance organizations : practices and results of employee involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 companies , 1995 .

[28]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[29]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading groups in organizations , 1986 .

[30]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  The effects of individual time urgency on group polychronicity , 1999 .

[31]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[32]  G. Neuman,et al.  Team effectiveness: beyond skills and cognitive ability. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[34]  Lisa Hope Pelled.  RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY AND PERCEPTIONS OF GROUP CONFLICT AND PERFORMANCE: A FIELD INVESTIGATION , 1996 .

[35]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Personality, Organizational Culture, and Cooperation: Evidence from a Business Simulation. , 1995 .

[36]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[37]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[38]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  The nomological and predictive validity of time urgency , 1998 .

[39]  M. Deutsch.  The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[40]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[41]  C. Gersick.  MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .

[42]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  C. Judd,et al.  Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[45]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Cracks in Diversity Research: The Effects of Diversity Faultlines on Conflict and Performance , 2003 .

[46]  Marie Waung,et al.  The Effects of Conscientiousness and Opportunity to Caucus on Group Performance , 1998 .

[47]  Laurie L. Levesque,et al.  Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams , 2001 .

[48]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[49]  J. Jaccard,et al.  The Detection and Interpretation of Interaction Effects Between Continuous Variables in Multiple Regression. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[50]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[51]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams , 2001 .

[52]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. , 1978 .

[53]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[54]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .

[55]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social Identity, Organizations, and Leadership , 2001 .

[56]  S. Jackson.  CONSEQUENCES OF GROUP COMPOSITION FOR THE I NTERPERSONAL DYNAMICS OF STRATEGIC ISSUE PROCESSING , 2004 .

[57]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[58]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  Terry M. Coalter,et al.  Context, Cognition, and Common Method Variance: Psychometric and Verbal Protocol Evidence , 1996 .

[60]  J. Thayer,et al.  Time urgency: the construct and its measurement. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  S. Jackson,et al.  Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. , 1991 .

[62]  E. Ramsden.  Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[63]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[64]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Diversity in organizations: Lessons from demography research. , 1995 .

[65]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[66]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Diversity in organizations : new perspectives for a changing workplace , 1998 .

[67]  Haleh Rastegary,et al.  The Interactions among Time Urgency, Uncertainty, and Time Pressure , 1993 .

[68]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[69]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[70]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[71]  A. Mazur,et al.  A cross-species comparison of status in small established groups. , 1973, American sociological review.

[72]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. , 1995 .

[73]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  EAST MEETS WEST MEETS MIDEAST: FURTHER EXPLORATIONS OF COLLECTIVISTIC AND INDIVIDUALISTIC WORK GROUPS. , 1991 .

[74]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[75]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[76]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[77]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[78]  B. L. Zohman,et al.  Type a Behavior and Your Heart , 1975 .

[79]  L. Offermann,et al.  Organizations of the future: Changes and challenges. , 1990 .

[80]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[81]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[82]  T. Ostrom,et al.  Person perception in heterogeneous groups. , 1985 .

[83]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[84]  Y. Amir,et al.  Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[85]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations , 1995 .

[86]  D. Eden,et al.  Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? , 1985 .

[87]  Clint Chadwick,et al.  TO AGREE OR NOT TO AGREE: THE EFFECTS OF VALUE CONGRUENCE, INDIVIDUAL DEMOGRAPHIC DISSIMILARITY, AND CONFLICT ON WORKGROUP OUTCOMES , 1997 .

[88]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  The Relationship between Work-Team Personality Composition and the Job Performance of Teams , 1999 .

[89]  D. Denison,et al.  From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model , 1996 .

[90]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[91]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  Introduction: Perspectives for understanding diverse work teams. , 1995 .

[92]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  On the Use of the Coefficient of Variation as a Measure of Diversity , 2000 .