Clinical Significance of Quantitative Assessment of Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex (RAIR) in Patients With Constipation

Background Rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is routinely assessed in anorectal manometry and is of clinical value in the diagnosis of patients with constipation. However, no quantitative analysis is currently available for the assessment of RAIR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of RAIR in patients with constipation. Methods Nine healthy subjects, 22 constipation patients (CO) and 26 fecal incontinence patients (FI) were enrolled in this study. RAIR was solicited by inflating the balloon with various volumes from 10 to 50 mL. The percentage of relaxation was determined on the basis of the rectal resting sphincter pressure and residual pressure with the balloon distention. Results Percentage of internal sphincter relaxation induced by rectal distention in constipation patients was significantly lower with distention of 20, 30, 40, and 50 mL in comparison with that in healthy subjects (Mixed model, P<0.05). The volume of distention required to achieve a relaxation of 50% was significantly higher in patients with CO (37.3±3.1 mL) than that in healthy subjects (27.8±2.6 mL, P<0.03) or FI (26.3±2.3 mL, P<0.05). It was also found that the percentage of relaxation could be used to differentiate the patients with constipation with a specificity of 64% and a sensitivity of 67%. Conclusions Patients with CO have impaired RAIR in comparison with healthy subjects and patients with FI. Quantitative assessment of RAIR is valuable in the diagnosis of patients with CO and may be incorporated in the clinical anorectal manometric test.

[1]  D. Drossman,et al.  Rome III: The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders , 2006 .

[2]  W. Whitehead,et al.  Biofeedback is superior to laxatives for normal transit constipation due to pelvic floor dyssynergia. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[3]  S. Jimenez,et al.  Impaired Rectoanal Inhibitory Response in Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis): An Association with Fecal Incontinence , 2004, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[4]  J. Kempf,et al.  Dyssynergic Defecation: Demographics, Symptoms, Stool Patterns, and Quality of Life , 2004, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[5]  S. Sangkhathat,et al.  Crucial role of rectoanal inhibitory reflex in emptying function after anoplasty in infants with anorectal malformations. , 2004, Asian journal of surgery.

[6]  J. Croffie,et al.  Impact of Sedation and Anesthesia on the Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex in Children , 2004, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[7]  Mustafa Okandan,et al.  Low-Cost Instrumentation for the Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's Disease , 2003, Journal of Medical Systems.

[8]  F. Cianchi,et al.  Anterior rectocele and anorectal dysfunction , 2004, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[9]  E. Weiss,et al.  Recovery of the Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex After Restorative Proctocolectomy , 2003, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[10]  R. Sakakibara,et al.  Colonic transit time and rectoanal videomanometry in Parkinson’s disease , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  G. Boeckxstaens,et al.  A prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision in patients with a rectal carcinoma. , 2003, Surgery.

[12]  G. Duthie,et al.  Rectoanal Reflex Parameters in Incontinence and Constipation , 2002, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[13]  A. Gasbarrini,et al.  Idiopathic chronic constipation: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. , 2001, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[14]  P. gordon.  Anorectal anatomy and physiology. , 2001, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[15]  W. Whitehead,et al.  Treatment options for fecal incontinence , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[16]  A. Peña,et al.  Advances in the management of anorectal malformations. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[17]  Robin C. Spiller,et al.  Rome II: the Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Diagnosis, Pathophysiology and Treatment: a Multinational Consensus , 2000 .

[18]  K. Deen,et al.  The recto‐anal inhibitory reflex: Abnormal response in diabetics suggests an intrinsic neuroenteropathy † , 1998, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[19]  S. S. Rao.  The technical aspects of biofeedback therapy for defecation disorders. , 1998, The Gastroenterologist.

[20]  S. S. Rao,et al.  Can biofeedback therapy improve anorectal function in fecal incontinence? , 1996, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[21]  E A Mayer,et al.  Altered rectal perception is a biological marker of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. , 1995, Gastroenterology.

[22]  A. Schmidt.  Electromanometrical investigations in patients with isolated neuronal intestinal dysplasia (NID). , 1994, European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie.

[23]  D. Drossman,et al.  The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment : A Multinational Consensus , 1994 .

[24]  A R Zinsmeister,et al.  Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study. , 1992, Gastroenterology.

[25]  R. Ger.  Surgical anatomy of the pelvis. , 1988, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[26]  P. Ducrotte,et al.  Biofeedback training for constipation in adults and children , 1987, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[27]  M. Swash,et al.  Neural control of internal anal sphincter function , 1987, The British journal of surgery.