Environmental monitoring using next generation sequencing: rapid identification of macroinvertebrate bioindicator species

IntroductionInvertebrate communities are central to many environmental monitoring programs. In freshwater ecosystems, aquatic macroinvertebrates are collected, identified and then used to infer ecosystem condition. Yet the key step of species identification is often not taken, as it requires a high level of taxonomic expertise, which is lacking in most organizations, or species cannot be identified as they are morphologically cryptic or represent little known groups. Identifying species using DNA sequences can overcome many of these issues; with the power of next generation sequencing (NGS), using DNA sequences for routine monitoring becomes feasible.ResultsIn this study, we test if NGS can be used to identify species from field-collected samples in an important bioindicator group, the Chironomidae. We show that Cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and Cytochrome B (CytB) sequences provide accurate DNA barcodes for chironomid species. We then develop a NGS analysis pipeline to identifying species using megablast searches of high quality sequences generated using 454 pyrosequencing against comprehensive reference libraries of Sanger-sequenced voucher specimens. We find that 454 generated COI sequences successfully identified up to 96% of species in samples, but this increased up to 99% when combined with CytB sequences. Accurate identification depends on having at least five sequences for a species; below this level species not expected in samples were detected. Incorrect incorporation of some multiplex identifiers (MID’s) used to tag samples was a likely cause, and most errors could be detected when using MID tags on forward and reverse primers. We also found a strong quantitative relationship between the number of 454 sequences and individuals showing that it may be possible to estimate the abundance of species from 454 pyrosequencing data.ConclusionsNext generation sequencing using two genes was successful for identifying chironomid species. However, when detecting species from 454 pyrosequencing data sets it was critical to include known individuals for quality control and to establish thresholds for detecting species. The NGS approach developed here can lead to routine species-level diagnostic monitoring of aquatic ecosystems.

[1]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded , 2006 .

[2]  Mark Blaxter,et al.  Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[3]  D. Tautz,et al.  Reverse taxonomy: an approach towards determining the diversity of meiobenthic organisms based on ribosomal RNA signature sequences , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  T. Wiederholm.  Use of benthos in lake monitoring , 1980 .

[5]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Biomonitoring 2.0: a new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next‐generation DNA sequencing , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[6]  F. Chris JonesF.C. Jones,et al.  Taxonomic sufficiency: The influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates , 2008 .

[7]  M. Paul,et al.  Stressor tolerance values for benthic macroinvertebrates in Mississippi , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[8]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring , 2012 .

[9]  P. Phillips,et al.  IMPACT SOURCE DETERMINATION WITH BIOMONITORING DATA IN NEW YORK STATE: CONCORDANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL DATA , 2002 .

[10]  Mark Davison,et al.  Long-term data assessment of chironomid taxa structure and function in the River Thames , 2000 .

[11]  V. Guryev,et al.  Phylogeny of the genus Chironomus (Diptera) inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase I. , 2001, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[12]  C. Lindegaard.  Classification of water-bodies and pollution , 1995 .

[13]  T. Ekrem.  A taxonomic revision of the genus Stempellinella (Diptera: Chironomidae) , 2007 .

[14]  S. Gresens,et al.  Discrimination of Cricotopus species (Diptera: Chironomidae) by DNA barcoding , 2008, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[15]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  DNA identification of urban Tanytarsini chironomids (Diptera:Chironomidae) , 2007, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[16]  Motomi Ito,et al.  Current progress in DNA barcoding and future implications for entomology , 2011 .

[17]  E. Willassen,et al.  A comprehensive DNA sequence library is essential for identification with DNA barcodes. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[18]  Mark Blaxter,et al.  Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  O. A. Sæther.  Chironomid communities as water quality indicators , 1979 .

[20]  D. Currie,et al.  Identification of Nearctic black flies using DNA barcodes (Diptera: Simuliidae) , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[21]  B. W. Sweeney,et al.  Can DNA barcodes of stream macroinvertebrates improve descriptions of community structure and water quality? , 2011, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[22]  I. Hodkinson,et al.  Terrestrial and Aquatic Invertebrates as Bioindicators for Environmental Monitoring, with Particular Reference to Mountain Ecosystems , 2005, Environmental management.

[23]  R. Crozier,et al.  The cytochrome b region in the mitochondrial DNA of the ant Tetraponera rufoniger: Sequence divergence in hymenoptera may be associated with nucleotide content , 1994, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[24]  Mark Blaxter,et al.  DNA taxonomy of a neglected animal phylum: an unexpected diversity of tardigrades , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  H. Magalon,et al.  DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae) , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Daniel L. Lindner,et al.  Don't make a mista(g)ke: is tag switching an overlooked source of error in amplicon pyrosequencing studies? , 2012 .

[27]  C. Hawkins,et al.  Assessing Macroinvertebrate Biodiversity in Freshwater Ecosystems: Advances and Challenges in DNA-based Approaches , 2010, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[28]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The effects of sediment quality on benthic macroinvertebrates in the River Murray, Australia , 2009 .

[29]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Effects of sediment quality on macroinvertebrates in the Sunraysia region of the Murray-Darling Rivers, Australia. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[30]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Effects of long‐chain hydrocarbon‐polluted sediment on freshwater macroinvertebrates , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[31]  A. Vogler,et al.  DNA-based species delineation in tropical beetles using mitochondrial and nuclear markers , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  A field‐based microcosm method to assess the effects of polluted urban stream sediments on aquatic macroinvertebrates , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[33]  B. Statzner,et al.  Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches. , 2006, Annual review of entomology.

[34]  David P. Larsen,et al.  Rare species in multivariate analysis for bioassessment: some considerations , 2001, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[35]  M. Ronaghi,et al.  A pyrosequencing-tailored nucleotide barcode design unveils opportunities for large-scale sample multiplexing , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  P. Hebert,et al.  Biological identifications of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[37]  V. Resh,et al.  How common are rare taxa in long-term benthic macroinvertebrate surveys? , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[38]  R. Hewlett.  Implications of taxonomic resolution and sample habitat for stream classification at a broad geographic scale , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[39]  R. Giblin-Davis,et al.  Reproducibility of read numbers in high‐throughput sequencing analysis of nematode community composition and structure , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[40]  Gaurav Vaidya,et al.  DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[41]  S. Bahrndorff,et al.  A microcosm test of adaptation and species specific responses to polluted sediments applicable to indigenous chironomids (Diptera). , 2006, Environmental pollution.

[42]  M. Strand,et al.  DNA barcoding should accompany taxonomy – the case of Cerebratulus spp (Nemertea) , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[43]  A. Galimberti,et al.  Integrated taxonomy: traditional approach and DNA barcoding for the identification of filarioid worms and related parasites (Nematoda) , 2009, Frontiers in Zoology.

[44]  Lester L. Yuan.  Assigning macroinvertebrate tolerance classifications using generalised additive models , 2004 .

[45]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  A combination of molecular and morphological approaches resolves species in the taxonomically difficult genus Procladius Skuse (Diptera: Chironomidae) despite high intra-specific morphological variation , 2011, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[46]  Ary A. Hoffmann,et al.  Phylogenetic signals and ecotoxicological responses: potential implications for aquatic biomonitoring , 2011, Ecotoxicology.

[47]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Isolating the impact of sediment toxicity in urban streams. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[48]  R. Giblin-Davis,et al.  Ecometagenetics confirm high tropical rainforest nematode diversity , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[49]  L. Tedersoo,et al.  454 Pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing of tropical mycorrhizal fungi provide similar results but reveal substantial methodological biases. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[50]  D. Baird,et al.  Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach for Biomonitoring Applications Using River Benthos , 2011, PloS one.

[51]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Identifying chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) for biological monitoring with PCR–RFLP , 2003, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[52]  J. Moulton,et al.  Evolution and phylogenetic utility of CAD (rudimentary) among Mesozoic-aged Eremoneuran Diptera (Insecta). , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[53]  D. Steinke,et al.  Utility of DNA taxonomy and barcoding for the inference of larval community structure in morphologically cryptic Chironomus (Diptera) species , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[54]  L. Borges,et al.  Investigating the taxonomy and systematics of marine wood borers (Bivalvia : Teredinidae) combining evidence from morphology, DNA barcodes and nuclear locus sequences , 2012, Invertebrate Systematics.

[55]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Combining rapid bioassessment and field‐based microcosms for identifying impacts in an urban river , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[56]  Jeremy R. deWaard,et al.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  R. Meier,et al.  From ‘cryptic species’ to integrative taxonomy: an iterative process involving DNA sequences, morphology, and behaviour leads to the resurrection of Sepsis pyrrhosoma (Sepsidae: Diptera) , 2010 .

[58]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  High molecular weight petroleum hydrocarbons differentially affect freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[59]  Xin Zhou,et al.  DNA barcoding facilitates description of unknown faunas: a case study on Trichoptera in the headwaters of the Tigris River, Iraq , 2011, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[60]  U. Stenzel,et al.  Parallel tagged sequencing on the 454 platform , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[61]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. , 1994, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.

[62]  P. Neville,et al.  Standardising terrestrial invertebrate biomonitoring techniques across natural and agricultural systems , 2007 .

[63]  P. Mather,et al.  Systematics and biogeography of the Gondwanan Orthocladiinae (Diptera: Chironomidae). , 2011, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[64]  Matthew J. Colloff,et al.  Ecological assessment of estuarine sediments by pyrosequencing eukaryotic ribosomal DNA , 2010 .

[65]  R. Giblin-Davis,et al.  Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[66]  Vincent H. Resh,et al.  Taxonomy and stream ecology—The benefits of genus- and species-level identifications , 2001, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[67]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The Utility of DNA Markers in Classical Taxonomy: Using Cytochrome Oxidase I Markers to Differentiate Australian Cladopelma (Diptera: Chironomidae) Midges , 2005 .

[68]  David R. Lenat,et al.  Water Quality Assessment of Streams Using a Qualitative Collection Method for Benthic Macroinvertebrates , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[69]  R. Good,et al.  Universal primers for fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments—an efficient and cost‐effective approach to genotyping by fluorescence , 2012, Molecular ecology resources.

[70]  D. M. Rosenberg,et al.  Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. , 1994 .

[71]  Abraham E. Tucker,et al.  Evaluating high‐throughput sequencing as a method for metagenomic analysis of nematode diversity , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[72]  L. Ruse,et al.  Chironomidae (Diptera) species distribution related to environmental characteristics of the metal-polluted Arkansas river, Colorado. , 2000 .

[73]  R. Marchant,et al.  Do rare species have any place in multivariate analysis for bioassessment? , 2002, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[74]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The response of Chironomidae to sediment pollution and other environmental characteristics in urban wetlands , 2007 .

[75]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Next‐generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research , 2012, Molecular ecology.