Place and Chips: Virtual Communities, Governance and the Environment

This article examines the significance of virtual communities whose formation has been facilitated by advances in communications technologies. This involves discussing the evolving role and autonomy of national governments in relation to processes of globalization, set within the context of the challenges faced by governments to coordinate global responses to environmental degradation. The Principality of Sealand, the Global State of Waveland and the Dominion of Melchizedek are discussed. It is argued that it is less their claims to state-hood that is significant but rather the ability to act autonomously that they represent. Governance is considered as a process that extends beyond national policy decision-making. This more inclusive approach pays more attention to both civil society and, in relation to advances in telecommunications, the methods various actors utilize to further their agendas.

[1]  P. Wapner,et al.  Environmental activism and world civic politics , 1996 .

[2]  B. Anderson,et al.  Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism , 1986 .

[3]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[4]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Power and governance in a partially globalized world , 2002 .

[5]  Richard Hylton.  Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism , 1996 .

[6]  P. Waterman.  Globalization, social movements, and the new internationalisms , 1998 .

[7]  J. Gottmann,et al.  Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography , 1993 .

[8]  D. Holmes.  Virtual politics : identity and community in cyberspace , 1999 .

[9]  M. Mann,et al.  Has globalization ended the rise and rise of the nation-state? , 1997 .

[10]  Karen T. Litfin.  The greening of sovereignty in world politics , 1998 .

[11]  Felix Stalder,et al.  The control revolution: how the internet is putting individuals in charge and changing the world. , 1999, CSOC.

[12]  Zdravko Mlinar.  Globalization and territorial identities , 1992 .

[13]  J. Everard,et al.  Virtual States: The Internet and the Boundaries of the Nation State , 1999 .

[14]  R. Palan.  Tax Havens and the Commercialization of State Sovereignty , 2002, International Organization.

[15]  D. Morley,et al.  Spaces of Identity: Global Media, Electronic Landscapes and Cultural Boundaries , 1995 .

[16]  A. James.  The Practice of Sovereign Statehood in Contemporary International Society , 1999 .

[17]  Friedrich Kratochwil,et al.  The Return of Culture and Identity in Ir Theory , 1996 .

[18]  Richard C. Leone,et al.  The Control Revolution , 1999 .

[19]  Jonathan M. Winer,et al.  Fighting Terrorist Finance , 2002 .

[20]  K. Mills.  Cybernations: Identity, Self-determination, Democracy and the "Internet Effect" in the Emerging Information Order , 2002 .

[21]  R. Falk.  Humane governance for the world: reviving the quest , 2000 .

[22]  Leon J. Goldstein.  The End of History and the Last Man , 1993 .

[23]  A. Buttimer,et al.  The Human Experience of Space and Place , 1980 .

[24]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[25]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Globalization in Question. The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance , 1996 .

[26]  T. Luke.  Cyberspace as Meta-Nation: The Net Effects of Online E-Publicanism , 2001 .

[27]  R. Jackson,et al.  Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World , 1990 .

[28]  R. Lipschutz,et al.  Global Civil Society and Global Environmental Governance: The Politics of Nature from Place to Planet , 1996 .