Effects of contrast between onsets of speech and other complex spectra.

Previous studies using speech and nonspeech analogs have shown that auditory mechanisms which serve to enhance spectral contrast contribute to perception of coarticulated speech for which spectral properties assimilate over time. In order to better understand the nature of contrastive auditory processes, a series of CV syllables varying acoustically in F2-onset frequency and perceptually from /ba/ to /da/ was identified following a variety of spectra including three-peak renditions of [e] and [o], one-peak simulations of only F2, and spectral complements of these spectra for which peaks are replaced with troughs. Results for three-versus one-peak (or trough) precursor spectra were practically indistinguishable, suggesting that effects were spectrally local and not dependent upon perception of precursors as speech. Effects of complementary (trough) spectra had complementary effects on perception of following stops; however, effects for spectral complements were particularly dependent upon the interval between precursor and CV onsets. Results from these studies cannot be explained by simple masking or adaptation of suppression. Instead, they provide evidence for the existence of processes that selectively enhance contrast between onset spectra of neighboring sounds, and these processes are relevant for perception of connected speech.

[1]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Basilar-membrane response to multicomponent stimuli in chinchilla. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  General Auditory Processes Contribute to Perceptual Accommodation of Coarticulation , 2000, Phonetica.

[3]  A. Lotto,et al.  Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  V. Mann,et al.  Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A. Lotto,et al.  General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  P. Heil,et al.  Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. II. Response strength. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  P. Heil,et al.  Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. I. First-spike timing. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J. W. Horst,et al.  Coding of spectral fine structure in the auditory nerve. II: Level-dependent nonlinear responses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Response timing constraints on the cortical representation of sound time structure. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. Diehl,et al.  An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of stops and glides. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R. Diehl,et al.  Vowel-length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: an auditory explanation , 1988 .

[13]  Q. Summerfield,et al.  Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  A. Samuel Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  R. Frisina,et al.  Sensitivity of auditory-nerve fibers to changes in intensity: a dichotomy between decrements and increments. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Perceiving vowels from uniform spectra: Phonetic exploration of an auditory aftereffect , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Speech coding in the auditory nerve: IV. Sounds with consonant-like dynamic characteristics. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  B. Moore,et al.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R. Port,et al.  Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  J M Festen,et al.  Relations between auditory functions in normal hearing. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Phonetic features and acoustic invariance in speech , 1981, Cognition.

[24]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  V. Mann Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception , 1980 .

[26]  V. Mann Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[28]  A. Liberman,et al.  Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  B. Delgutte Representation of speech-like sounds in the discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  F. Wightman Pitch and stimulus fine structure. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  T. Houtgast Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  L. Raphael Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  Responses of some neurons of the cochlear nucleus to tone-intensity increments. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  H. Duifhuis,et al.  Audibility of high harmonics in a periodic pulse. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Kengo Ohgushi,et al.  A model of the Peripheral Auditory System , 1968 .

[36]  B. Cardozo Ohm's Law and Masking , 1967 .

[37]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  B. Lindblom Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction , 1963 .

[39]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  Detection of a Pulsed Sinusoid in Noise as a Function of Frequency , 1959 .

[40]  J. Gibson,et al.  The Negative After-Effect of the Perception of a Surface Slanted in the Third Dimension , 1959 .

[41]  C I HOVLAND,et al.  Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  P. Denes Effect of Duration on the Perception of Voicing , 1955 .

[43]  Christman Rj,et al.  Shifts in pitch as a function of prolonged stimulation with pure tones. , 1954 .

[44]  H. Wallach Brightness constancy and the nature of achromatic colors. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  S. Fernberger A figural after-effect in the third dimension of visual space. , 1948, The American journal of psychology.

[46]  W. Kohler,et al.  Figural after-effects in the third dimensions of visual space. , 1947, The American journal of psychology.

[47]  A. Ames The Space Eikonometer Test for Aniseikonia , 1945 .

[48]  J. Gibson Adaptation with negative after-effect. , 1937 .

[49]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[50]  A. Ames Aniseikonia—A Factor in the Functioning of Vision , 1935 .

[51]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. , 1933 .

[52]  J. P. Guilford,et al.  The Effect of Interpolated Weights upon Comparative Judgments , 1931 .

[53]  F. Bartlett,et al.  A NOTE ON LOCAL FATIGUE IN THE AUDITORY SYSTEM , 1922 .

[54]  J. Flügel ON LOCAL FATIGUE IN AUDITORY SYSTEM , 1920 .

[55]  J. Gibson,et al.  ADAPTATION , AFTEREFFECT AND CONTRAST IN THE PERCEPTION OF TILTED LINES , 2004 .

[56]  Michael Kiefte,et al.  Synthetic speech stimuli spectrally normalized for nonhuman cochlear dimensions , 2002 .

[57]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Auditory Neural Processing of Speech , 2002 .

[58]  A R Palmer,et al.  Level dependence of cochlear nucleus onset unit responses and facilitation by second tones or broadband noise. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  B. Repp Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  Neal F. Viemeister,et al.  Adaptation of Masking , 1980 .

[61]  R L Smith,et al.  Adaptation, saturation, and physiological masking in single auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  J. Lederberg,et al.  Size Adaptation : A New Aftereffect , 1969 .

[63]  S. Ohman Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  S. Öhman Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements , 1966 .

[65]  R. J. Christman,et al.  Shifts in pitch as a function of prolonged stimulation with pure tones. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[66]  H. Wallach,et al.  Figural aftereffects; an investigation of visual processes. , 1944 .

[67]  J. Locke An Essay concerning Human Understanding , 1924, Nature.