Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage.

Polymeric medical devices widely used in orthopedic surgery play key roles in fracture fixation and orthopedic implant design. Topographical modification and surface micro-roughness of these devices regulate cellular adhesion, a process fundamental in the initiation of osteoinduction and osteogenesis. Advances in fabrication techniques have evolved the field of surface modification; in particular, nanotechnology has allowed the development of nanoscale substrates for the investigation into cell-nanofeature interactions. In this study human osteoblasts (HOBs) were cultured on ordered nanoscale pits and random nano "craters" and "islands". Adhesion subtypes were quantified by immunofluorescent microscopy and cell-substrate interactions investigated via immuno-scanning electron microscopy. To investigate the effects of these substrates on cellular function 1.7 k microarray analysis was used to establish gene profiles of enriched STRO-1+ progenitor cell populations cultured on these nanotopographies. Nanotopographies affected the formation of adhesions on experimental substrates. Adhesion formation was prominent on planar control substrates and reduced on nanocrater and nanoisland topographies; nanopits, however, were shown to inhibit directly the formation of large adhesions. STRO-1+ progenitor cells cultured on experimental substrates revealed significant changes in genetic expression. This study implicates nanotopographical modification as a significant modulator of osteoblast adhesion and cellular function in mesenchymal populations.

[1]  Hisataka Sabe,et al.  Interaction of Paxillin with Poly(A)-Binding Protein 1 and Its Role in Focal Adhesion Turnover and Cell Migration , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[2]  D. Otzen,et al.  Transient formation of nano‐crystalline structures during fibrillation of an Aβ‐like peptide , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  R Thull,et al.  Nanostructured niobium oxide coatings influence osteoblast adhesion. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[4]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[5]  C. Lindqvist,et al.  Bioresorbable poly-L/DL-lactide (P[L/DL]LA 70/30) plates are reliable for repairing large inferior orbital wall bony defects: a pilot study. , 2006, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Directional control of cell motility through focal adhesion positioning and spatial control of Rac activation , 2008, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[7]  Hollis G Potter,et al.  The cellular and molecular biology of periprosthetic osteolysis. , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  R G Richards,et al.  Regulation of implant surface cell adhesion: characterization and quantification of S‐phase primary osteoblast adhesions on biomimetic nanoscale substrates , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  P S Walker,et al.  Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopaedic use. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[10]  A. Montag,et al.  Regulation of osteogenic differentiation during skeletal development. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[11]  I. Gwynn,et al.  Backscattered electron imaging of the undersurface of resin‐embedded cells by field‐emission scanning electron microscopy , 1995, Journal of microscopy.

[12]  A. Curtis,et al.  Microtopography of metal surfaces influence fibroblast growth by modifying cell shape, cytoskeleton, and adhesion , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  W. Van Hul,et al.  Wnt signaling: a win for bone. , 2008, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[14]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Dynamics and segregation of cell–matrix adhesions in cultured fibroblasts , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  A. Bershadsky,et al.  Focal contacts of normal and RSV-transformed quail cells. Hypothesis of the transformation-induced deficient maturation of focal contacts. , 1985, Experimental cell research.

[16]  S. Hanks,et al.  Focal Adhesion Kinase Suppresses Apoptosis by Binding to the Death Domain of Receptor-Interacting Protein , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  David I. Wilson,et al.  Characterization and Multipotentiality of Human Fetal Femur–Derived Cells: Implications for Skeletal Tissue Regeneration , 2006, Stem cells.

[18]  N. Carragher,et al.  Src-Mediated Phosphorylation of Focal Adhesion Kinase Couples Actin and Adhesion Dynamics to Survival Signaling , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[19]  B. Nebe,et al.  Control of focal adhesion dynamics by material surface characteristics. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[20]  C. Luppen,et al.  Reconciling the roles of FAK in osteoblast differentiation, osteoclast remodeling, and bone regeneration. , 2007, Bone.

[21]  T. Chambers Regulation of the differentiation and function of osteoclasts , 2000, The Journal of pathology.

[22]  Cameron J Wilson,et al.  Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[23]  C. D. W. Wilkinson,et al.  The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[24]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[25]  Nureddin Ashammakhi,et al.  Self-reinforced bioresorbable poly-L/DL-lactide [SR-P(L/DL)LA] 70/30 miniplates and miniscrews are reliable for fixation of anterior mandibular fractures: a pilot study. , 2004, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[26]  B. Riggs,et al.  Circulating osteoblast-lineage cells in humans. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  L. Addadi,et al.  Hierarchical assembly of cell-matrix adhesion complexes. , 2004, Biochemical Society transactions.

[28]  Peter Thomsen,et al.  Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: A review of different theories , 2006, Acta orthopaedica.

[29]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[30]  T. Day,et al.  Wnt and hedgehog signaling pathways in bone development. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  J. A. Currey,et al.  FAK-Mediated Mechanotransduction in Skeletal , 2007 .

[32]  R. Albin Regeneration , 1993, Neurology.

[33]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Biomimetic Polymer Nanostructures by Injection Molding , 2003 .

[34]  David G Castner,et al.  Characterizing multicomponent adsorbed protein films using electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis, time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry, and radiolabeling: capabilities and limitations. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[35]  R. Oreffo,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[36]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Morphological and microarray analysis of human fibroblasts cultured on nanocolumns produced by colloidal lithography. , 2005, European cells & materials.

[37]  R. G. Richards,et al.  Variation in cell-substratum adhesion in relation to cell cycle phases. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[38]  K. Anselme,et al.  Influence of hydroxyapatite microstructure on human bone cell response. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[39]  H. Kim,et al.  Varying Ti-6Al-4V surface roughness induces different early morphologic and molecular responses in MG63 osteoblast-like cells. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[40]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  Superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity of regular nanopatterns. , 2005, Nano letters.

[41]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[42]  Tom Shemesh,et al.  Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal adhesions: experiments and models. , 2006, European journal of cell biology.

[43]  Eun Kyu Lee,et al.  Analysis of protein adsorption characteristics to nano-pore silica particles by using confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.

[44]  N. Carragher,et al.  Focal adhesion and actin dynamics: a place where kinases and proteases meet to promote invasion. , 2004, Trends in cell biology.

[45]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[46]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Arrays of nano-dots for cellular engineering , 2003 .

[47]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[48]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  A parallel-plate flow chamber to study initial cell adhesion on a nanofeatured surface , 2004, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[49]  M. Horton,et al.  Skeletal tissues as nanomaterials , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[50]  Gabriela Kalna,et al.  Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[51]  A. Sall,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase mediates the interferon‐γ‐inducible GTPase‐induced phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase/Akt survival pathway and further initiates a positive feedback loop of NF‐κB activation , 2008, Cellular microbiology.

[52]  S. Affrossman,et al.  Cell response to nano-islands produced by polymer demixing: a brief review. , 2004, IEE proceedings. Nanobiotechnology.

[53]  Daniel Howard,et al.  Immunoselection and adenoviral genetic modulation of human osteoprogenitors: in vivo bone formation on PLA scaffold. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[54]  A. Curtis,et al.  IMMUNOGOLD LABELLING OF FIBROBLAST FOCAL ADHESION SITES VISUALISED IN FIXED MATERIAL USING SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, AND LIVING, USING INTERNAL REFLECTION MICROSCOPY , 2001, Cell biology international.

[55]  E. Zamir,et al.  Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[56]  Patricia J Keely,et al.  Focal adhesion regulation of cell behavior. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[57]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[58]  J. Bai,et al.  Inhibitory role of focal adhesion kinase on anoikis in the lung cancer cell A549 , 2008, Cell biology international.

[59]  D. Burr,et al.  A Model for mechanotransduction in bone cells: The load‐bearing mechanosomes , 2003, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[60]  Mark Clements,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells , 2007, Stem Cell Reviews.