Sea-change in reproductive health in emergencies: how systemic improvements to address the MISP were achieved

Abstract The Minimum Initial Services Package (MISP) for reproductive health has been the minimum standard for reproductive health service provision in humanitarian emergencies since 1995. Assessments of acute humanitarian settings in 2004 and 2005 revealed few MISP services in place and low knowledge of the MISP among humanitarian responders. Just 10 years later, assessments of humanitarian settings in 2013 and 2015 found largely consistent availability of MISP services and high awareness of the MISP as a standard among responders. We describe the multi-pronged strategy undertaken by the Women’s Refugee Commission and other Inter-agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises (IAWG) member agencies to effect systemic improvements in the availability of the MISP at the onset of humanitarian responses. We find that investments in fact-finding missions, awareness-raising, capacity development, policy harmonisation, targeted funding, emergency risk management, and community resilience-building have been critical to facilitating a sea-change in reproductive health responses in acute, large-scale emergencies. Efforts were underpinned by collaborative, inter-agency partnerships in which organisations were committed to working together to achieve shared goals. The strategies, activities, and achievements contain valuable lessons for the health sector, including reproductive health, and other sectors seeking to better integrate emerging or marginalised issues into humanitarian action.

[1]  A. Dawson,et al.  Developing Institutional Capacity for Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Settings: A Descriptive Study , 2015, PloS one.

[2]  S. Chynoweth Advancing reproductive health on the humanitarian agenda: the 2012-2014 global review , 2015, Conflict and Health.

[3]  P. Patel,et al.  Tracking humanitarian funding for reproductive health: a systematic analysis of health and protection proposals from 2002-2013 , 2015, Conflict and Health.

[4]  Noreen M. Giga,et al.  Reproductive health services for Syrian refugees in Zaatri Camp and Irbid City, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan: an evaluation of the Minimum Initial Services Package , 2015, Conflict and Health.

[5]  A. Myers,et al.  Evaluation of the MISP for reproductive health services in post-earthquake Nepal. , 2016 .

[6]  S. Pécourt,et al.  Building national resilience for sexual and reproductive health: learning from current experiences. , 2016 .

[7]  S. Krause,et al.  Priority reproductive health activities in Haiti. An inter-agency MISP assessment conducted by CARE International Planned Parenthood Federation Save the Children and Women’s Refugee Commission. , 2011 .

[8]  S. Krause,et al.  Minimum initial service package (MISP) for reproductive health in crisis situations: a distance learning module. 2011 revision. , 2011 .

[9]  S. Krause,et al.  Reproductive health priorities in an emergency. Assessment of the Minimum Initial Service Package in tsunami-affected areas in Indonesia. , 2005 .

[10]  W. Doedens,et al.  Lifesaving Reproductive Health Care, Ignored and Neglected: Assessment of the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) of Reproductive Health for Sudanese Refugees in Chad , 2004 .

[11]  A. Pillsbury,et al.  Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children , 2004 .

[12]  Krishnan Sharma,et al.  Department of Economic and Social Affairs.” , 2000 .

[13]  Gerhard Jentzsch,et al.  Working group on , 1991 .