Abortion surveillance - United States, 2010.

PROBLEM/CONDITION Since 1969, CDC has conducted abortion surveillance to document the number and characteristics of women obtaining legal induced abortions in the United States. REPORTING PERIOD COVERED 2010. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM Each year, CDC requests abortion data from the central health agencies of 52 reporting areas (the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City). The reporting areas provide this information voluntarily. For 2010, data were received from 49 reporting areas. For the purpose of trend analysis, abortion data were evaluated from the 46 areas that reported data every year during 2001-2010. Census and natality data, respectively, were used to calculate abortion rates (number of abortions per 1,000 women) and ratios (number of abortions per 1,000 live births). RESULTS A total of 765,651 abortions were reported to CDC for 2010. Of these abortions, 753,065 (98.4%) were from the 46 reporting areas that provided data every year during 2001-2010. Among these same 46 reporting areas, the abortion rate for 2010 was 14.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years, and the abortion ratio was 228 abortions per 1,000 live births. Compared with 2009, the total number and rate of reported abortions for 2010 decreased 3% and reached the lowest levels for the entire period of analysis (2001-2010); the abortion ratio was stable, changing only 0.4%. From 2001 to 2010, the total number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions decreased 9%, 10%, and 8%, respectively. Given the 3% decrease from 2009 to 2010 in the total number and rate of reported abortions, in combination with the 5% decrease that had occurred in the previous year from 2008 to 2009, the overall decrease for both measures was greater during 2006-2010 than during 2001-2005, despite the annual variations that resulted in no net decrease during 2006-2008. In 2010 and throughout the period of analysis, women in their 20s accounted for the majority of abortions and had the highest abortion rates, whereas women in their 30s and older accounted for a much smaller percentage of abortions and had lower abortion rates. In 2010, women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years accounted for 32.9% and 24.5% of all abortions, respectively, and had abortion rates of 26.7 and 20.2 abortions per 1,000 women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years, respectively. In contrast, women aged 30-34, 35-39, and ≥40 years accounted for 15.3%, 8.9%, and 3.4% of all abortions, respectively, and had abortion rates of 13.2, 7.6, and 2.8 abortions per 1,000 women aged 30-34 years, 35-39 years, ≥40 years, respectively. Throughout the period of analysis, abortion rates decreased among women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years, whereas they increased among women aged ≥40 years. In 2010, adolescents aged 15-19 years accounted for 14.6% of all abortions and had an abortion rate of 11.7 abortions per 1,000 adolescents aged 15-19 years. Throughout the period of analysis, the percentage of all abortions accounted for by adolescents and the adolescent abortion rate decreased. In contrast to the percentage distribution of abortions and abortion rates by age, abortion ratios in 2010 and throughout the entire period of analysis were highest among adolescents and lowest among women aged 30-39 years. Abortion ratios decreased from 2001 to 2010 for women in all age groups except for those aged <15 years, for whom they increased. In 2010, most (65.9%) abortions were performed at ≤8 weeks' gestation, and 91.9% were performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation. Few abortions (6.9%) were performed at 14-20 weeks' gestation, and even fewer (1.2%) were performed at ≥21 weeks' gestation. From 2001 to 2010, the percentage of all abortions performed at ≤8 weeks' gestation increased 10%, whereas the percentage performed at >13 weeks' decreased 10%. Moreover, among abortions performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation, the distribution shifted toward earlier gestational ages, with the percentage of these abortions performed at ≤6 weeks' gestation increasing 36%. In 2010, a total of 72.4% of abortions were performed by curettage at ≤13 weeks' gestation, 17.7% were performed by early medical abortion (a nonsurgical abortion at ≤8 weeks' gestation), and 8.3% were performed by curettage at >13 weeks' gestation. Among abortions that were performed at ≤8 weeks' gestation, and thus were eligible for early medical abortion on the basis of gestational age, 26.5% were completed by this method. From 2009 to 2010, the use of early medical abortion increased 13%. Deaths of women associated with complications from abortions for 2010 are being investigated under CDC's Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System. In 2009, the most recent year for which data were available, eight women were identified to have died as a result of complications from known legal induced abortions. No reported deaths were associated with illegal induced abortions. INTERPRETATION Among the 46 areas that reported data every year during 2001-2010, the gradual decrease that had occurred during previous decades in the total number and rate of reported abortions continued through 2005, whereas year-to-year variation from 2006 to 2008 resulted in no net change during this later period. However, the large decreases that occurred both from 2008 to 2009 and from 2009 to 2010 resulted in a greater overall decrease during 2006-2010 as compared with 2001-2005 and the lowest number and rate of reported abortions for the entire period of analysis. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIONS Unintended pregnancy is the major contributor to abortion. Because unintended pregnancies are rare among women who use the most effective methods of reversible contraception, increasing access to and use of these methods can help further reduce the number of abortions performed in the United States. The data in this report can help program planners and policy makers identify groups of women at greatest risk for unintended pregnancy and help guide and evaluate prevention efforts.

[1]  E. Lichtenberg,et al.  Surgical abortion prior to 7 weeks of gestation. , 2013, Contraception.

[2]  D. Paton,et al.  Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception. , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  A. Creanga,et al.  Trends in use of medical abortion in the United States: reanalysis of surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001-2008. , 2012, Contraception.

[4]  W. Mosher,et al.  Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006-2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995. , 2012, National health statistics reports.

[5]  L. Finer,et al.  Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009. , 2012, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  W. Mosher,et al.  Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982-2010. , 2012, National health statistics reports.

[7]  L. Finer,et al.  Who has second-trimester abortions in the United States? , 2012, Contraception.

[8]  K. Thapa,et al.  A prospective study of complications from comprehensive abortion care services in Nepal , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[9]  J. Sackoff,et al.  Medication abortions among New York City residents, 2001-2008. , 2011, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[10]  L. Finer,et al.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. , 2011, Contraception.

[11]  T. Joyce The supply-side economics of abortion. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Rachel K. Jones,et al.  Changes in Abortion Rates Between 2000 and 2008 and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  L. Finer,et al.  Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level. , 2011, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[14]  Rachel K. Jones,et al.  Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008. , 2011, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[15]  Patricia A Lohr Md Mph Facog Management of Unintended and Abnormal Pregnancy: Comprehensive Abortion Care , 2010 .

[16]  J. Peipert,et al.  The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  Laura M. Gaydos,et al.  Reasons for and challenges of recent increases in teen birth rates: a study of family planning service policies and demographic changes at the state level. , 2010, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[18]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Association Between Pregnancy Intention and Reproductive-health Related Behaviors Before and After Pregnancy Recognition, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2002 , 2010, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[19]  L. Finer,et al.  Effect of Mifepristone on Abortion Access in the United States , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  Susheela Singh,et al.  Trends in Abortion in the United States , 2009, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  J. Santelli,et al.  Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States. , 2009, Studies in family planning.

[22]  S. Ventura Changing patterns of nonmarital childbearing in the United States. , 2009, NCHS data brief.

[23]  J. Martin,et al.  Births : final data for 2006 , 2009 .

[24]  S. Ventura,et al.  Estimated pregnancy rates by outcome for the United States, 1990-2004. , 2008, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[25]  L. Finer,et al.  Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. , 2008, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[26]  D. Hoyert Maternal mortality and related concepts. , 2007, Vital & health statistics. Series 3, Analytical and epidemiological studies.

[27]  Susheela Singh,et al.  Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States. , 2006, Contraception.

[28]  L. Finer,et al.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. , 2006, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[29]  William D Mosher,et al.  Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: data on men and women from cycle 6 (2002) of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. , 2006, Vital and health statistics. Series 23, Data from the National Survey of Family Growth.

[30]  P. Darney,et al.  Risk Factors Associated With Presenting for Abortion in the Second Trimester , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  William D Mosher,et al.  Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002. , 2004, Advance data.

[32]  D. Reardon Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  J. Santelli,et al.  The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. , 2003 .

[34]  J. Darroch,et al.  Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000-2001. , 2002, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[35]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Early surgical abortion: efficacy and safety. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  L. Klerman The Intendedness of Pregnancy: A Concept in Transition , 2000, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[37]  J. Stanford,et al.  Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. , 1999, Family planning perspectives.

[38]  S. Newcomer,et al.  Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum? , 1999, Family planning perspectives.

[39]  S. Henshaw Abortion incidence and services in the United States, 1995-1996. , 1998, Family planning perspectives.

[40]  D. S. Wilkinson,et al.  Pregnancy Intentions, Pregnancy Attitudes, and the Use of Prenatal Care in Missouri , 1998, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[41]  R. Saul Abortion reporting in the United States: an examination of the federal-state partnership. , 1998, Family planning perspectives.

[42]  S. Carson,et al.  New technologies permit safe abortion at less than six weeks' gestation and provide timely detection of ectopic gestation. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[43]  S. Henshaw,et al.  Abortion patients in 1994-1995: characteristics and contraceptive use. , 1996, Family planning perspectives.

[44]  L. E. Ferris,et al.  Factors associated with immediate abortion complications. , 1996, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[45]  S. Henshaw,et al.  The characteristics and prior contraceptive use of U.S. abortion patients. , 1988, Family planning perspectives.

[46]  K. Schulz,et al.  Abortions That Fail , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[47]  K. Schulz,et al.  The risk of serious complications from induced abortion: do personal characteristics make a difference? , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[48]  K. Schulz,et al.  Mid-trimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation: a safe and practical alternative. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[49]  L. Shulman Delays in request for pregnancy termination: comparison of patients in the first and second trimesters , 2010 .

[50]  T. Joyce,et al.  The Impact of State Mandatory Counseling and Waiting Period Laws on Abortion: A Literature Review , 2009 .

[51]  T. Joyce,et al.  The Impact of Laws Requiring Parental Involvement for Abortion : A Literature Review , 2009 .

[52]  S. Henshaw,et al.  Trends in the Characteristics of Women Obtaining Abortions, 1974 to 2004 , 2008 .

[53]  Laura M. Gaydos,et al.  Circumstances of Pregnancy: Low Income Women in Georgia Describe the Difference between Planned and Unplanned Pregnancies , 2006, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[54]  L. Finer,et al.  Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000. , 2003, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[55]  Director,et al.  Public Health Service Health Services and Mental Health Administration , 2001 .

[56]  T. Joyce,et al.  The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion. , 2000, Family planning perspectives.

[57]  W. Mosher,et al.  Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995. , 1998, Family planning perspectives.

[58]  S. Henshaw Unintended pregnancy in the United States. , 1998, Family planning perspectives.

[59]  M. Creinin,et al.  Early abortion: Surgical and medical options , 1997 .

[60]  J. Trussell Contraceptive efficacy. , 1995, Archives of dermatology.

[61]  M. Potts,et al.  Contraceptive technology. , 1984, Draper Fund report.

[62]  S. Jc,et al.  Abortion surveillance in the United States. , 1974 .