Modelling Spatial Patterns of Trees Attacked by Bark-beetles

Many species of bark-beetles kill trees in clusters. One of the most destructive forest insect pests with this colonization pattern is the mountain pine-beetle. Heavy losses caused by this beetle are of primary concern to national forest managers in western North America. An understanding of the process of tree selection by the beetles is useful for prescribing measures that might minimize beetle damage. Here, an autologistic model is used to study the spatial patterns of lodgepole pine trees attacked by the beetles. The model is used to describe the conditional probability that a tree of a given size, age and vigour is attacked given the status of all other trees in the stand. The spatial correlation between trees is modelled by constructing a covariate that is a measure of the angles from attacked trees to other trees in the stand. Some surprising difficulties in modelling conditional probabilities are discussed. Parameter estimates are obtained by maximizing a pseudolikelihood function, and estimates of standard errors are obtained from iteratively simulated samples.

[1]  J. Nelder,et al.  The GLIM System Release 3. , 1979 .

[2]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[3]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[4]  J. Besag.  Nearest‐Neighbour Systems and the Auto‐Logistic Model for Binary Data , 1972 .

[5]  Gene D. Amman,et al.  Mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Part II: Population dynamics. , 1983 .

[6]  R. F. Shepherd,et al.  Factors Influencing the Orientation and Rates of Activity of Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) , 1966, The Canadian Entomologist.

[7]  J. Borden.  Semiochemicals and bark beetle populations: Exploitation of natural phenomena by pest management strategists , 1989 .

[8]  H. White.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models , 1982 .

[9]  B. Efron.  More Efficient Bootstrap Computations , 1990 .

[10]  D. J. Strauss,et al.  Pseudolikelihood Estimation for Social Networks , 1990 .

[11]  G. D. Amman.  Mountain Pine Beetle Brood Production in Relation to Thickness of Lodgepole Pine Phloem , 1972 .

[12]  Alan A. Berryman,et al.  DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE): PRE-AGGREGATION LANDING AND GALLERY INITIATION ON LODGEPOLE PINE , 1980, The Canadian Entomologist.

[13]  J. Besag.  Efficiency of pseudolikelihood estimation for simple Gaussian fields , 1977 .

[14]  A. Berryman,et al.  GUSTATORY CUES IN THE ORIENTATION OF DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) TO HOST TREES , 1982, The Canadian Entomologist.

[15]  R. Waring,et al.  Stem Growth per Unit of Leaf Area: A Measure of Tree Vigor , 1980 .

[16]  B. Efron.  The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[17]  B. Dennis,et al.  Evolution of Optimal Group Attack, with Particular Reference to Bark Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) , 1985 .

[18]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  R. Waring,et al.  Thinning lodgepole pine increases tree vigor and resistance to mountain pine beetle. , 1983 .

[20]  R. G. Mitchell,et al.  Analysis of spatial patterns of lodgepole pine attacked by outbreak populations of the mountain pine beetle , 1991 .

[21]  J. Besag.  Statistical Analysis of Non-Lattice Data , 1975 .