Dealing with Ignored Attributes in Choice Experiments on Valuation of Sweden’s Environmental Quality Objectives

Using a choice experiment, this paper investigates how Swedish citizens value three environmental quality objectives. In addition, a follow-up question is used to investigate whether respondents ignored any attributes when responding. The resulting information is used in model estimation by restricting the individual parameters for the ignored attributes to zero. When taking the shares of respondents who took both the environmental and the cost attributes (52–69% of the respondents) into account, then the WTP for each attribute changes if the respondents who ignored the attributes have a zero WTP. At the same time, we find evidence that not all respondents who claimed to have ignored an attribute really did. However, the most commonly ignored non-monetary attributes always have the lowest rankings in terms of WTP across all three environmental objectives. Thus, our results show that instead of ignoring attributes completely, respondents seem to put less weight on the attributes they claimed to have ignored.

[1]  T. Haab.  Nonparticipation or Misspecification? The Impacts of Nonparticipation on Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1999 .

[2]  L. Hitchens.  Ståle Navrud and Richard C. Ready (eds.): 2002, Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts , 2003 .

[3]  B. Kriström.  Spike Models in Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[4]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[5]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated-Pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs , 1997 .

[6]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Choice Experiments and Surveys , 2005 .

[7]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Stated preference in the valuation of interurban road safety. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments , 2008 .

[9]  Scott D. Thomson,et al.  An Introduction , 1977 .

[10]  Carl Johan Lagerkvist,et al.  Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments , 2005 .

[11]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. , 2003, Health economics.

[12]  Ronald J. Glass,et al.  MEASURING THE EXISTENCE VALUE OF WILDLIFE - WHAT DO CVM ESTIMATES REALLY SHOW , 1991 .

[13]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Preferences with and without prices - does the price attribute affect behavior in stated preference surveys? , 2007 .

[14]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[15]  Krister Hjalte,et al.  The Value of a Statistical Life in Transport: Findings from a New Contingent Valuation Study in Sweden , 2001 .

[16]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes , 2004 .

[17]  K. Sælensminde,et al.  Inconsistent choices in Stated Choice data;Use of the logit scaling approach to handle resulting variance increases , 2001 .

[18]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Assessing Management Options for Weed Control with Demanders and Non-Demanders in a Choice Experiment , 2008, Land Economics.

[19]  T. Brown,et al.  Measuring dispositions for lexicographic preferences of environmental goods: integrating economics, psychology and ethics , 2003 .

[20]  D. Hensher,et al.  Revealing the extent of process heterogeneity in choice analysis , 2009 .

[21]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Monitoring Choice Task Attribute Attendance in Nonmarket Valuation of Multiple Park Management Services: Does It Matter? , 2010, Land Economics.

[22]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method , 1999 .

[23]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1995 .

[24]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation , 2001 .

[25]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[26]  John W. O'hagan,et al.  National museums: To charge or not to charge? , 1995 .

[27]  K. Sælensminde,et al.  The Impact of Choice Inconsistencies in Stated Choice Studies , 2002 .

[28]  J. R. DeShazo,et al.  Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency , 2002 .

[29]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Lexicographic Preferences in Discrete Choice Experiments: Consequences on Individual-Specific Willingness to Pay Estimates , 2006 .

[30]  John A. List,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value Non-Market Goods and Services: Evidence from Field Experiments , 2006 .

[31]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[32]  A. Murphy,et al.  Modelling Winners and Losers in Contingent Valuation of Public Goods: Appropriate Welfare Measures and Econometric Analysis , 2001 .