Residue Geometry Networks: A Rigidity-Based Approach to the Amino Acid Network and Evolutionary Rate Analysis

Amino acid networks (AANs) abstract the protein structure by recording the amino acid contacts and can provide insight into protein function. Herein, we describe a novel AAN construction technique that employs the rigidity analysis tool, FIRST, to build the AAN, which we refer to as the residue geometry network (RGN). We show that this new construction can be combined with network theory methods to include the effects of allowed conformal motions and local chemical environments. Importantly, this is done without costly molecular dynamics simulations required by other AAN-related methods, which allows us to analyse large proteins and/or data sets. We have calculated the centrality of the residues belonging to 795 proteins. The results display a strong, negative correlation between residue centrality and the evolutionary rate. Furthermore, among residues with high closeness, those with low degree were particularly strongly conserved. Random walk simulations using the RGN were also successful in identifying allosteric residues in proteins involved in GPCR signalling. The dynamic function of these residues largely remain hidden in the traditional distance-cutoff construction technique. Despite being constructed from only the crystal structure, the results in this paper suggests that the RGN can identify residues that fulfil a dynamical function.

[1]  S. Karnik,et al.  Modulation of GDP Release from Transducin by the Conserved Glu134-Arg135 Sequence in Rhodopsin* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Constraint Network Analysis (CNA): A Python Software Package for Efficiently Linking Biomacromolecular Structure, Flexibility, (Thermo-)Stability, and Function , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[3]  Alex W. Chin,et al.  Constrained geometric dynamics of the Fenna–Matthews–Olson complex: the role of correlated motion in reducing uncertainty in excitation energy transfer , 2014, Photosynthesis Research.

[4]  E. Martz Introduction to proteins—structure, function, and motion , 2012 .

[5]  Yu Xia,et al.  Structural determinants of protein evolution are context-sensitive at the residue level. , 2009, Molecular biology and evolution.

[6]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Automated design of the surface positions of protein helices , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  Jack Snoeyink,et al.  Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published April 22, 2007 MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids , 2007 .

[8]  Dongsup Kim,et al.  Modeling allosteric signal propagation using protein structure networks , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[9]  Julián Echave,et al.  Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved? , 2012 .

[10]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  HIV-1 TAR RNA Spontaneously Undergoes Relevant Apo-to-Holo Conformational Transitions in Molecular Dynamics and Constrained Geometrical Simulations , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  Bairong Shen,et al.  Amino acid network for the discrimination of native protein structures from decoys. , 2014, Current protein & peptide science.

[12]  Matthieu Schapira,et al.  Molecular Characterization of a Novel Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase from Plasmodium Parasites , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Parallel dynamics and evolution: Protein conformational fluctuations and assembly reflect evolutionary changes in sequence and structure , 2014, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[14]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Structural dynamics flexibility informs function and evolution at a proteome scale , 2013, Evolutionary applications.

[15]  T. Sakmar,et al.  Rhodopsin: insights from recent structural studies. , 2002, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[16]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  CNA web server: rigidity theory-based thermal unfolding simulations of proteins for linking structure, (thermo-)stability, and function , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  A Teplyakov,et al.  Crystal structure of bacteriophage T4 deoxynucleotide kinase with its substrates dGMP and ATP. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[18]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Crystal structures of the myristylated catalytic subunit of cAMP‐dependent protein kinase reveal open and closed conformations , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  Pietro Liò,et al.  Prediction by Graph Theoretic Measures of Structural Effects in Proteins Arising from Non-Synonymous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  M. Cosgrove,et al.  On the mechanism of the reaction catalyzed by glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[21]  David M. Beazley,et al.  Python Essential Reference , 1999 .

[22]  A. J. Venkatakrishnan,et al.  Universal allosteric mechanism for Gα activation by GPCRs , 2015, Nature.

[23]  Petra Fromme,et al.  Docking of photosystem I subunit C using a constrained geometric simulation. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  I. Bahar,et al.  Sequence Evolution Correlates with Structural Dynamics , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[25]  C Altenbach,et al.  Structural features and light-dependent changes in the sequence 306-322 extending from helix VII to the palmitoylation sites in rhodopsin: a site-directed spin-labeling study. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[26]  Bairong Shen,et al.  The construction of an amino acid network for understanding protein structure and function , 2014, Amino Acids.

[27]  C. Cannings Statistical Methods in Molecular Evolution , 2006 .

[28]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  An automated approach to network features of protein structure ensembles , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[29]  J E Jimenez-Roldan,et al.  Comparative analysis of rigidity across protein families , 2009, Physical biology.

[30]  B. Nordstrom FINITE MARKOV CHAINS , 2005 .

[31]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coupling between catalytic site and collective dynamics: a requirement for mechanochemical activity of enzymes. , 2005, Structure.

[32]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[33]  J. Trewhella,et al.  Solution structure of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit and its contraction upon binding the protein kinase inhibitor peptide. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[34]  Aric Hagberg,et al.  Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX , 2008, Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference.

[35]  M. Thorpe,et al.  Constrained geometric simulation of diffusive motion in proteins , 2005, Physical biology.

[36]  N. Xuong,et al.  A binary complex of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and adenosine further defines conformational flexibility. , 1997, Structure.

[37]  Udo Oppermann,et al.  The Crystal Structure of Human Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase Reveals a Novel Hexameric Arrangement and Inhibitory Product Binding* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[39]  N. Goodey,et al.  Allosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via a common route. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[40]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  Identification of domains and domain interface residues in multidomain proteins from graph spectral method , 2005, Proteins.

[41]  Victoria A. Higman,et al.  Uncovering network systems within protein structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  Leo S. D. Caves,et al.  Bio3d: An R Package , 2022 .

[43]  A. Holt,et al.  Impact of intracellular domain flexibility upon properties of activated human 5-HT3 receptors* , 2014, British journal of pharmacology.

[44]  Simon Whelan,et al.  Statistical Methods in Molecular Evolution , 2005 .

[45]  Viktor Hornak,et al.  Helix Movement is Coupled to Displacement of the Second Extracellular Loop in Rhodopsin Activation , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[46]  Daniel J Cole,et al.  Constrained geometric simulation of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. , 2014, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[47]  Stephen A Wells,et al.  Geometric simulation of flexible motion in proteins. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[48]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Residue centrality, functionally important residues, and active site shape: Analysis of enzyme and non‐enzyme families , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.