Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography.

INTRODUCTION Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is making headway into imaging for orthodontics. The purpose of this study was to define CBCT multi-planar reformatted projections for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) examination and compare the accuracy of linear measurements of the TMJ and related structures from these projections with similar measurements made with conventional cephalograms and with the anatomic truth. METHODS Linear dimensions between 11 anatomical sites were measured with a digital caliper to assess the anatomic truth for 25 dry human skulls. The skulls were imaged with iCAT (Xoran Technologies, Ann Arbor, Mich/Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, Pa) CBCT, and cephalograms were made in all 3 orthogonal planes (lateral cephalometric [LC], posteroanterior [PA], and submentovertex [SMV]) acquired with photostimulable phosphor plates. Linear measurements were made on 7 custom CBCT reconstructions and the digital cephalograms. Modality means and the natural log of the standard deviations were compared post hoc against the actual dimensions by using analysis of variance with the Dunnett t test. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS All CBCT measurements were accurate; however, 3 of 5 LC measurements, 4 of 5 PA measurements, and 4 of 6 SMV measurements varied significantly from the truth. Intraobserver CBCT measurements were highly reliable compared with anatomic truth and significantly more reliable than measurements made from LC, PA, and SMV images. CONCLUSIONS Custom oblique multi-planar reformatted reconstructions with iCAT CBCT provide accurate and reliable linear measurements of mandibular and TMJ dimensions.

[1]  D. Hatcher,et al.  Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[2]  S Baumrind,et al.  Using three-dimensional imaging to assess treatment outcomes in orthodontics: a progress report from the University of the Pacific. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[3]  U Welander,et al.  Dimensional reproduction in rotational panoramic radiography. , 1986, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[4]  H. Stamatakis,et al.  Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[5]  K. Ueda,et al.  Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  Yoshinori Arai,et al.  A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[7]  R Schmelzle,et al.  Intraoperative 3D imaging of the facial skeleton using the SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D. , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[8]  P Sukovic,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[9]  R. Nanda,et al.  Prospective study of posttreatment changes in the temporomandibular joint. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  K Maki,et al.  Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[11]  W. Solberg,et al.  The temporomandibular joint in young adults at autopsy: a morphologic classification and evaluation. , 1985, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  Y. Nakagawa,et al.  Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[13]  D. C. Dixon Radiographic diagnosis oftemporomandibular disorders , 1995 .

[14]  J. Posnick,et al.  Craniofacial Skeletal Measurements Based on Computed Tomography: Part I. Accuracy and Reproducibility , 1992 .

[15]  S. Brooks,et al.  Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. , 2003, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[16]  D. Hatcher,et al.  A three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway in adolescents. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[17]  Yoshinori Arai,et al.  Clinical application of a new cone-beam computerized tomography system to assess multiple two-dimensional images for the preoperative treatment planning of maxillary implants: case reports. , 2004, Quintessence international.

[18]  Kaoru Kobayashi,et al.  Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[19]  C. Lascala,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[20]  P. Mozzo,et al.  A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results , 1998, European Radiology.

[21]  M. Könönen,et al.  A Follow-up Study of Radiographic Findings in the Mandibular Condyles of Orthodontically Treated Patients and Associations with TMD , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[22]  G. Adam,et al.  Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[23]  Robert A Danforth,et al.  Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships. , 2003, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[24]  James Mah,et al.  3-D volume imaging for dentistry: a new dimension. , 2003, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[25]  D. Hatcher,et al.  Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[26]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Diagnostic Image Analyses of Activator Treated Temporomandibular Joint in Growth and Maturing Stages , 2002, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[27]  J Brief,et al.  Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. , 2002, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[28]  J. Posnick,et al.  Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography. , 1993, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[29]  M W Vannier,et al.  Craniofacial computed tomography scanning: technology, applications and future trends. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[30]  Predrag Sukovic,et al.  Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[31]  P. Westesson,et al.  Imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. , 1997, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.