Model-Independent Detection of New Physics Signals Using Interpretable Semi-Supervised Classifier Tests
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Kenward,et al. An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .
[2] P. Sen,et al. On the asymptotic performance of the log likelihood ratio statistic for the mixture model and related results , 1984 .
[3] Ivan Oseledets,et al. Active Subspace of Neural Networks: Structural Analysis and Universal Attacks , 2020, SIAM J. Math. Data Sci..
[4] Paul G. Constantine,et al. Active Subspaces - Emerging Ideas for Dimension Reduction in Parameter Studies , 2015, SIAM spotlights.
[5] R. D’Agnolo,et al. Learning new physics from a machine , 2018, Physical Review D.
[6] B. Lindsay,et al. The distribution of the likelihood ratio for mixtures of densities from the one-parameter exponential family , 1994 .
[7] Marco Cuturi,et al. Computational Optimal Transport: With Applications to Data Science , 2019 .
[8] Ankur Taly,et al. Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks , 2017, ICML.
[9] B. Nachman,et al. Anomaly detection with density estimation , 2020, Physical Review D.
[10] David Shih,et al. Simulation assisted likelihood-free anomaly detection , 2020 .
[11] A General search for new phenomena in ep scattering at HERA , 2004 .
[12] Alessandro Rinaldo,et al. Distribution-Free Predictive Inference for Regression , 2016, Journal of the American Statistical Association.
[13] B. Kégl,et al. The ATLAS Higgs Boson Machine Learning Challenge , 2014 .
[14] P. Bhat. Multivariate Analysis Methods in Particle Physics , 2011 .
[15] John Maindonald,et al. Data Analysis and Graphics Using R: An Example-based Approach (Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics) , 2003 .
[16] C. Metz. Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[17] R. Newcombe,et al. Confidence intervals for an effect size measure based on the Mann–Whitney statistic. Part 1: general issues and tail‐area‐based methods , 2006, Statistics in medicine.
[18] H. Ishwaran. Variable importance in binary regression trees and forests , 2007, 0711.2434.
[19] J. Hanley. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. , 1989, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.
[20] B. Nachman,et al. Anomaly Detection for Resonant New Physics with Machine Learning. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[21] Kyle Cranmer,et al. Practical Statistics for the LHC , 2014, 1503.07622.
[22] Kazuhiro Terao,et al. Machine learning at the energy and intensity frontiers of particle physics , 2018, Nature.
[23] Achim Zeileis,et al. BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central Methodology article Conditional variable importance for random forests , 2008 .
[24] Tapani Raiko,et al. Semi-supervised detection of collective anomalies with an application in high energy particle physics , 2012, The 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).
[25] E. al.,et al. Global search for new physics with 2.0 fb(-1) at CDF , 2008, 0809.3781.
[26] Denis Perret-Gallix,et al. New computing techniques in physics research : proceedings of the First International Workshop on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems in High Energy and Nuclear Physics : March 19-24, 1990, Centre de Calcul de l'IN[2]P[3], Lyon Villeurbanne (France) , 1990 .
[27] Thomas Hebbeker,et al. MUSiC: A Model Unspecific Search for New Physics Based on $\sqrt{s}=8\,\text{TeV}$ CMS Data , 2017 .
[28] VARUN CHANDOLA,et al. Anomaly detection: A survey , 2009, CSUR.
[29] Gilles Louppe,et al. Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifiers , 2015, 1506.02169.
[30] J. Hanley,et al. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.
[31] Larry A. Wasserman,et al. Classification Accuracy as a Proxy for Two Sample Testing , 2016, The Annals of Statistics.
[32] Rolf-Dieter Reiss,et al. A Course on Point Processes , 1992 .
[33] Charanjit K. Khosa,et al. The LHC Olympics 2020 a community challenge for anomaly detection in high energy physics , 2021, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.
[34] Balázs Kégl,et al. The Higgs boson machine learning challenge , 2014, HEPML@NIPS.
[35] G. Menardi,et al. Nonparametric semi-supervised classification with application to signal detection in high energy physics , 2021, Statistical Methods & Applications.
[36] Brian D. Williamson,et al. A unified approach for inference on algorithm-agnostic variable importance , 2020 .
[37] P. D. Dauncey,et al. Handling uncertainties in background shapes: the discrete profiling method , 2014, 1408.6865.
[38] Tapani Raiko,et al. Semi-supervised anomaly detection – towards model-independent searches of new physics , 2011, 1112.3329.
[39] M. Schilling. Multivariate Two-Sample Tests Based on Nearest Neighbors , 1986 .
[40] Leo Breiman,et al. Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.
[41] The Cms Collaboration. Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC , 2012, 1207.7235.
[42] Ann B. Lee,et al. Global and local two-sample tests via regression , 2018, Electronic Journal of Statistics.
[43] N. Henze. A MULTIVARIATE TWO-SAMPLE TEST BASED ON THE NUMBER OF NEAREST NEIGHBOR TYPE COINCIDENCES , 1988 .
[44] U. Grömping. Dependence of Variable Importance in Random Forests on the Shape of the Regressor Space , 2009 .
[45] John D. Storey. A direct approach to false discovery rates , 2002 .
[46] J. Caudron,et al. A strategy for a general search for new phenomena using data-derived signal regions and its application within the ATLAS experiment , 2018, 1807.07447.
[47] Gregory Schott,et al. Data Analysis in High Energy Physics: A Practical Guide to Statistical Methods , 2013 .
[48] Qiqi Wang,et al. Erratum: Active Subspace Methods in Theory and Practice: Applications to Kriging Surfaces , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..
[49] Eric R. Ziegel,et al. Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.
[50] Johan Larsson,et al. Exploiting active subspaces to quantify uncertainty in the numerical simulation of the HyShot II scramjet , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..
[51] Hayes,et al. Review of Particle Physics. , 1996, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.
[52] M. J. Laan. Statistical Inference for Variable Importance , 2006 .
[53] Alexander Binder,et al. On Pixel-Wise Explanations for Non-Linear Classifier Decisions by Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation , 2015, PloS one.
[54] Eric R. Ziegel,et al. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.
[55] Trevor Hastie,et al. The elements of statistical learning. 2001 , 2001 .
[56] Avanti Shrikumar,et al. Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences , 2017, ICML.
[57] Yoshua Bengio,et al. Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.
[58] M. Pierini,et al. Learning multivariate new physics , 2019, The European Physical Journal C.
[59] B. Nachman,et al. Extending the search for new resonances with machine learning , 2019, Physical Review D.
[60] R. Newcombe,et al. Confidence intervals for an effect size measure based on the Mann–Whitney statistic. Part 2: asymptotic methods and evaluation , 2006, Statistics in medicine.
[61] K. Cranmer,et al. Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics , 2010, 1007.1727.