Grouping by closure influences subjective regularity and implicit preference

A reflection between a pair of contours is more rapidly detected than a translation, but this effect is stronger when the contours are closed to form a single object compared to when they are closed to form 2 objects with a gap between them. That is, grouping changes the relative salience of different regularities. We tested whether this manipulation would also change preference for reflection or translation. We measured preference for these patterns using the Implicit Association Test (IAT). On some trials, participants saw words that were either positive or negative and had to classify them as quickly as possible. On interleaved trials, they saw reflection or translation patterns and again had to classify them. Participants were faster when 1 button was used for reflection and positive words and another button was used for translation and negative words, compared to when the reverse response mapping was used (translation and positive vs. reflection and negative). This reaction time difference indicates an implicit preference for reflection over translation. However, the size of the implicit preference was significantly reduced in the Two-objects condition. We concluded that factors that affect perceptual sensitivity also systematically affect implicit preference formation.

[1]  J. Friedenberg,et al.  Contour symmetry detection: the influence of axis orientation and number of objects. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[2]  M. Bertamini,et al.  No within-object advantage for detection of rotation. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Detection of symmetry and repetition in one and two objects. Structures versus strategies. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[4]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Russell Eisenman,et al.  Complexity-simplicity: I. Preference for symmetry and rejection of complexity , 1967 .

[7]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience , 1999 .

[8]  F. Royer,et al.  Detection of symmetry. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Thomas Jacobsen,et al.  Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes? , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[10]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  The empirical determination of an aesthetic formula. , 1941 .

[11]  M Kubovy,et al.  Detection of symmetry and perceptual organization: the way a lock-and-key process works. , 1997, Acta psychologica.

[12]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Salience of Vertical Symmetry , 1994, Perception.

[13]  Rolf Reber,et al.  Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  Jon Driver,et al.  Obligatory edge-assignment in vision: The role of figure and part segmentation in symmetry detection. , 1995 .

[15]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review , 2007 .

[16]  C W Tyler,et al.  Empirical aspects of symmetry perception. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[17]  Matthias Sebastian Treder,et al.  Behind the Looking-Glass: A Review on Human Symmetry Perception , 2010, Symmetry.

[18]  S. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[19]  S. Tipper,et al.  Sensorimotor fluency influences affect: Evidence from electromyography , 2010 .

[20]  S. E. Watson,et al.  Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Ernst Mach,et al.  The analysis of sensations and the relation of the physical to the psychical , 1914, The Mathematical Gazette.

[22]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Implicit affective evaluation of visual symmetry. , 2012, Emotion.

[23]  Sascha Topolinski,et al.  Moving the Eye of the Beholder , 2010, Psychological science.

[24]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Normsfor English Words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Tech Report C-1) , 1999 .

[25]  P. Winkielman,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Prototypes Are Attractive Because They Are Easy on the Mind , 2022 .

[26]  T. Jacobsen,et al.  Aesthetic Judgments of Novel Graphic Patterns: Analyses of Individual Judgments , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings , 1999 .

[29]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  On the perception of symmetrical and repeated patterns , 1974 .

[30]  G. Carrus,et al.  The Automatic Aesthetic Evaluation of Different Art and Architectural Styles , 2011 .

[31]  Matthias S. Treder,et al.  Symmetry versus repetition in cyclopean vision: A microgenetic analysis , 2007, Vision Research.

[32]  S. Palmer.  Goodness, Gestalt, groups, and Garner: Local symmetry subgroups as a theory of figural goodness. , 1991 .

[33]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Detection of visual symmetries. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[34]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Sensitivity to Reflection and Translation is Modulated by Objectness , 2010, Perception.