Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations

Although the geographical context of ecological observations shapes ecological theory, the global distribution of ecological studies has never been analyzed. Here, we document the global distribution and context (protected status, biome, anthrome, and net primary productivity) of 2573 terrestrial study sites reported in recent publications (2004–2009) of 10 highly cited ecology journals. We find evidence of several geographical biases, including overrepresentation of protected areas, temperate deciduous woodlands, and wealthy countries. Even within densely settled or agricultural regions, ecologists tend to study “natural” fragments. Such biases in trendsetting journals may limit the scalability of ecological theory and hinder conservation efforts in the 75% of the terrestrial world where humans live and work.

[1]  A. Balmford,et al.  Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing and Land Sparing Compared , 2011, Science.

[2]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Funding begets biodiversity , 2011 .

[3]  Jacob G. Foster,et al.  Metaknowledge , 2011, Science.

[4]  Rob H. G. Jongman,et al.  Global Biodiversity Monitoring , 2010 .

[5]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000 , 2010 .

[6]  M. Metzger,et al.  An assessment of long term ecosystem research activities across European socio-ecological gradients. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[8]  Lucas Joppa,et al.  Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system. , 2009 .

[9]  Yolanda F. Wiersma,et al.  Efficiency and effectiveness in representative reserve design in Canada: The contribution of existing protected areas , 2009 .

[10]  M. Pavao-Zuckerman,et al.  Scratching the surface and digging deeper: exploring ecological theories in urban soils , 2009, Urban Ecosystems.

[11]  J. Ascher,et al.  The Bee Fauna of Residential Gardens in a Suburb of New York City (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) , 2008 .

[12]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world , 2008 .

[13]  Ben Collen,et al.  The Tropical Biodiversity Data Gap: Addressing Disparity in Global Monitoring , 2008 .

[14]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Beyond Urban Legends: An Emerging Framework of Urban Ecology, as Illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study , 2008 .

[15]  D. Smail.  On Deep History and the Brain , 2007 .

[16]  Randolph H. Lytton,et al.  On Deep History and the Brain , 2007 .

[17]  H. Haberl,et al.  Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  G. Ceballos.  Conservation priorities for mammals in megadiverse Mexico: the efficiency of reserve networks. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[19]  Andrey Rzhetsky,et al.  Microparadigms: chains of collective reasoning in publications about molecular interactions. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  D. Richardson,et al.  Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order , 2006 .

[21]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge , 2005 .

[22]  S. Pickett,et al.  Integrated urban ecosystem research , 1997, Urban Ecosystems.

[23]  D. Botkin,et al.  Cities as environments , 1997, Urban Ecosystems.

[24]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity , 2004, Nature.

[25]  J. P. Collins,et al.  A New Urban Ecology Modeling human communities as integral parts of ecosystems poses special problems for the development and testing of ecological theory , 2003 .

[26]  E. Sanderson,et al.  The Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild , 2002 .

[27]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Conservation Where People Live and Work , 2002 .

[28]  R. Kohler,,et al.  Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology , 2002 .

[29]  J. P. Collins,et al.  A New Urban Ecology , 2000, American Scientist.

[30]  N. Grimm,et al.  Integrated Approaches to Long-TermStudies of Urban Ecological Systems , 2000 .

[31]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992 , 1999 .

[32]  Clemens Tempfer,et al.  Geography of biomedical publications in the European Union, 1990-98 , 1999, The Lancet.

[33]  D. Thompson.  Geography of U.S. biomedical publications, 1990 to 1997. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  Charles L. Redman,et al.  Human Impact on Ancient Environments , 1999 .

[35]  S. Rowe.  Book Review: Discordant Harmonies, A New Ecology for the 21st Century , 1995 .

[36]  Andrew Metrick,et al.  Patterns of Behavior in Biodiversity Preservation , 1994 .

[37]  S. Pickett,et al.  Human as Components of Ecosystems: A Synthesis , 1993 .

[38]  Miriam Solomon,et al.  Scientific Rationality and Human Reasoning , 1992, Philosophy of Science.

[39]  N. Platnick.  Patterns of biodiversity: tropical vs temperate , 1991 .

[40]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem Structure and Function along Urban‐Rural Gradients: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology , 1990 .

[41]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[42]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[43]  D. Worster.  Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas , 1986 .