The Government 2.0 utilization model and implementation scenarios

Although it seems that Government 2.0 will finally deliver the promise of a truly transparent government, many practitioners around the globe (particularly those in the developing world) are reluctant or unable to develop strategies and allocate resources to Government 2.0. As a result, governments around the world ignore or mishandle the opportunities and threats presented by Government 2.0. The primary reason underlying this behavior is the lack of understanding regarding Government 2.0. The purpose of the study is to address this gap in knowledge and understanding by presenting and illustrating fundamental concepts of Government 2.0. A web survey of 200 government websites from 40 countries (20 each from advanced and developing countries) and 45 Web 2.0 initiatives across the globe was used to present and illustrate fundamental concepts of Government 2.0. We suggested a three stage Government 2.0 Utilization Model (GUM) starting from information socialization (stage 1), and then moving on to mass collaboration (stage 2), and social transaction (stage 3). Based on the web survey, we also suggested three Government 2.0 implementation scenarios (i.e., standalone, nested, and hybrid implementation). The study will help researchers and practitioners in understanding the Government 2.0 phenomenon and the opportunities presented by it.

[1]  Patrice McDermott,et al.  Building open government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Lori A. Brainard,et al.  Virtual Government–Citizen Relations , 2010 .

[3]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Jeffrey James,et al.  Internet skills in developing countries: how much do we know? , 2011 .

[5]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Measuring Twitter-based political participation and deliberation in the South Korean context by using social network and Triple Helix indicators , 2011, Scientometrics.

[6]  G. Khan,et al.  E-government service use intentions in Afghanistan: technology adoption and the digital divide in a war-torn country , 2012 .

[7]  D. de Kool,et al.  Web 2.0: A New Basis for E-Government? , 2008 .

[8]  Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam E‐government Web Site Development: Future Trends and Strategic Models , 2011 .

[9]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Government 2.0 Revisited: Social Media Strategies in the Public Sector , 2010 .

[10]  Vicente Pina,et al.  E-government evolution in EU local governments: a comparative perspective , 2009, Online Inf. Rev..

[11]  Mohammad Dadashzadeh,et al.  Social Media In Government: From eGovernment To eGovernance , 2010 .

[12]  Michael Mcguire Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It , 2006 .

[13]  Bruno S. Silvestre,et al.  Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media , 2011 .

[14]  小尾 敏夫 E-governance : a global perspective on a new paradigm , 2007 .

[15]  Daniel Lathrop,et al.  Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice , 2010 .

[16]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  The Second Wave of Digital Era Governance , 2010 .

[17]  G. I. Kustova,et al.  From the author , 2019, Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics.

[18]  H. Witteman,et al.  The defining characteristics of Web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vaccination debate. , 2012, Vaccine.

[19]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  E-government Skills Identification and Development: Toward a Staged-Based User-Centric Approach for Developing Countries , 2010 .

[20]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Collaborative e‐government , 2012 .

[22]  Rachel Silcock What is E-government , 2001 .

[23]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective , 2011, dg.o '11.

[25]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  W. Eggers Government 2.0: Using Technology to Improve Education, Cut Red Tape, Reduce Gridlock, and Enhance Democracy , 2004 .

[27]  D. Ocholla,et al.  Diffusion and adoption of ICTs in selected government departments in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa , 2011 .

[28]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[29]  Juri Stratford,et al.  Computerized and networked government information , 1997 .

[30]  Nicholas Gruen Engage: getting on with Government 2.0 , 2009 .

[31]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The endless wire: e-government as global phenomenon , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  J. Grimes,et al.  Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government , 2012 .

[33]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  A socio-technical perspective on e-government issues in developing countries: a scientometrics approach , 2011, Scientometrics.

[34]  Adnan A. Hyder,et al.  Web 2.0 and Internet Social Networking: A New tool for Disaster Management? - Lessons from Taiwan , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[35]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[36]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Fundacion Universidad de las Americas Puebla , 2022 .

[37]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[40]  Nigel Collier,et al.  A framework for enhancing spatial and temporal granularity in report-based health surveillance systems , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[41]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[42]  Ray Hackney,et al.  Towards an e-Government efficiency agenda: the impact of information and communication behaviour on e-Reverse auctions in public sector procurement , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Zahir Irani,et al.  e-Government: past, present and future , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events , 2009 .

[45]  Jin Chen,et al.  E-government adoption in public administration organizations: integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Noa Aharony,et al.  Twitter Use by three Political Leaders: An Exploratory Analysis , 2012, Online Inf. Rev..

[47]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[48]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[49]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..