Aggregating Causal Judgments

Decision making typically requires judgments about causal relations: we need to know the causal effects of our actions and the causal relevance of various environmental factors. We investigate how several individuals’ causal judgments can be aggregated into collective causal judgments. First, we consider the aggregation of causal judgments via the aggregation of probabilistic judgments and identify the limitations of this approach. We then explore the possibility of aggregating causal judgments independently of probabilistic ones. Formally, we introduce the problem of causal-network aggregation. Finally, we revisit the aggregation of probabilistic judgments when this is constrained by prior aggregation of qualitative causal judgments.

[1]  F. Dietrich,et al.  Judgment Aggregation By Quota Rules , 2007 .

[2]  Franz Dietrich,et al.  A generalised model of judgment aggregation , 2007, Soc. Choice Welf..

[3]  Carl G. Wagner,et al.  Allocation, Lehrer models, and the consensus of probabilities , 1982 .

[4]  C. List,et al.  Judgment aggregation: A survey , 2009 .

[5]  Christian List,et al.  A Model of Path-Dependence in Decisions over Multiple Propositions , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Christian List,et al.  A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions , 2003, Math. Soc. Sci..

[7]  M. Degroot.  Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[8]  P. Spirtes,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[9]  Christian Genest,et al.  Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography , 1986 .

[10]  Christian List,et al.  Majority voting on restricted domains , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[11]  K. McConway.  Marginalization and Linear Opinion Pools , 1981 .

[12]  Christian List,et al.  Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared1 , 2004, Synthese.

[13]  Independence Relations Produced by Parameter Values in Causal Models , 1990 .

[14]  C. Genest,et al.  Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis , 1987 .

[15]  C. Wagner,et al.  Rational Consensus in Science and Society , 1981 .

[16]  Marc Pauly,et al.  Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation , 2006, J. Philos. Log..

[17]  C. Wagner,et al.  On the formal properties of weighted averaging as a method of aggregation , 2004, Synthese.

[18]  Christian List.  Corrigendum to "A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions" [Mathematical Social Sciences 45 (2003), 1-13] , 2006, Math. Soc. Sci..

[19]  Tom Burr,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search , 2003, Technometrics.

[20]  Franz Dietrich,et al.  Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[21]  Gabriella Pigozzi,et al.  Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation , 2006, Synthese.

[22]  Christian List,et al.  A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation , 2008, Soc. Choice Welf..

[23]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation , 2009, Soc. Choice Welf..

[24]  Christian List,et al.  The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review , 2012, Synthese.

[25]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[26]  Christian List,et al.  The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation , 2005 .

[27]  J. Aczél,et al.  A Characterization of Weighted Arithmetic Means , 1980, SIAM J. Algebraic Discret. Methods.

[28]  C. List,et al.  Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result , 2002, Economics and Philosophy.