Physical and Biological Constraints Govern Perceived Animacy of Scrambled Human Forms

Point-light animations of biological motion are perceived quickly and spontaneously, giving rise to an irresistible sensation of animacy. However, the mechanisms that support judgments of animacy based on biological motion remain unclear. The current study demonstrates that animacy ratings increase when a spatially scrambled animation of human walking maintains consistency with two fundamental constraints: the direction of gravity and congruency between the directions of intrinsic and extrinsic motion. Furthermore, using a reverse-correlation method, we show that observers employ structural templates, or form-based “priors,” reflecting the prototypical mammalian body plan when attributing animacy to scrambled human forms. These findings reveal that perception of animacy in scrambled biological motion involves not only analysis of local intrinsic motion, but also its congruency with global extrinsic motion and global spatial structure. Thus, they suggest a strong influence of prior knowledge about characteristic features of creatures in the natural environment.

[1]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Body Configuration Modulates the Usage of Local Cues to Direction in Biological-Motion Perception , 2011, Psychological science.

[3]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Subconfigurations of the human form in the perception of biological motion displays. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[4]  D. Shanks,et al.  Evidence for a Distinction between Judged and Perceived Causality , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[6]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[7]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[8]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[9]  S. Lea,et al.  Visual Perception of Intentional Motion , 1994, Perception.

[10]  P. White Causal Processing: Origins and Development , 1988 .

[11]  E. Davidson,et al.  Gene Regulatory Networks and the Evolution of Animal Body Plans , 2006, Science.

[12]  A. Schlottmann,et al.  Goal attribution to schematic animals: do 6-month-olds perceive biological motion as animate? , 2010, Developmental science.

[13]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[14]  A. Leslie,et al.  Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? , 1987, Cognition.

[15]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Contribution of configural information in a direction discrimination task: Evidence using a novel masking paradigm , 2009, Vision Research.

[16]  F. Simion,et al.  A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  G. Csibra,et al.  Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy , 1999, Cognition.

[19]  Emily D Grossman,et al.  Temporal "Bubbles" reveal key features for point-light biological motion perception. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[20]  P. Rochat,et al.  Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality , 1997 .

[21]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Acceleration carries the local inversion effect in biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[22]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  R. C. Oldfield THE PERCEPTION OF CAUSALITY , 1963 .

[24]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[25]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  D. Premack The infant's theory of self-propelled objects , 1990, Cognition.

[27]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  Linking form and motion in the primate brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Perceptual and computational analysis of critical features for biological motion. , 2010, Journal of vision.