Actin filament barbed-end capping activity in neutrophil lysates: the role of capping protein-beta 2.

A barbed-end capping activity was found in high speed supernates of neutrophils lysed in submicromolar calcium. In dilute supernate (> or = 100-fold dilution of cytoplasm), this activity accounted for most of the inhibition of barbed-end elongation of pyrenyl-G-actin from spectrin-F-actin seeds. Pointed-end elongation from gelsolin-capped F-actin seeds was not inhibited at comparable concentrations of supernate, thus excluding actin monomer sequestration as a cause of the observed inhibition. Most of the capping activity was due to capping protein-beta 2 (a homologue of cap Z). Thus, while immunoadsorption of > or = 95% of the gelsolin in the supernate did not decrease capping activity, immunoadsorption of capping protein-beta 2 reduced capping activity proportionally to the amount of capping protein-beta 2 adsorbed. Depletion of > 90% of capping protein-beta 2 from the supernate removed 90% of its capping activity. The functional properties of the capping activity were defined. The dissociation constant for binding to barbed ends (determined by steady state and kinetic analyses) was approximately 1-2 nM; the on-rate of capping was between 7 x 10(5) and 5 x 10(6) M-1 s-1; and the off-rate was approximately 2 x 10(-3) s-1. The concentration of capper free in the intact cell (determined by adsorption of supernate with spectrin-actin seeds) was estimated to be approximately 1-2 microM. Thus, there appeared to be enough high affinity capper to cap all the barbed ends in vivo. Nevertheless, immediately after lysis with detergent, neutrophils contained sites that nucleate barbed-end elongation of pyrenyl-G-actin. These barbed ends subsequently become capped with a time course and concentration dependence similar to that of spectrin-F-actin seeds in high speed supernates. These observations suggest that, despite the excess of high affinity capper, some ends either are not capped in vivo or are transiently uncapped upon lysis and dilution.

[1]  J. Condeelis,et al.  Aginactin, an agonist-regulated F-actin capping activity is associated with an Hsc70 in Dictyostelium. , 1993, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  Actin microfilament dynamics in locomoting cells , 1991, Nature.

[3]  J. Spudich,et al.  The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. , 1971, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  S. Zigmond,et al.  Induction of actin polymerization in permeabilized neutrophils. Role of ATP. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  A. Füchtbauer,et al.  Disruption of microfilament organization after injection of F-actin capping proteins into living tissue culture cells , 1983, Nature.

[6]  Jonathan A. Cooper,et al.  Differential localization and sequence analysis of capping protein beta- subunit isoforms of vertebrates , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  J H Hartwig,et al.  Mechanisms of actin rearrangements mediating platelet activation , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  T. Südhof,et al.  gCap39, a calcium ion- and polyphosphoinositide-regulated actin capping protein. , 1990, Science.

[9]  D R Soll,et al.  “Dynamic morphology system”: A method for quantitating changes in shape, pseudopod formation, and motion in normal and mutant amoebae of Dictyostelium discoideum , 1988, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[10]  J. Bryan,et al.  Platelet activation induces the formation of a stable gelsolin-actin complex from monomeric gelsolin. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  J. Casella,et al.  Purification and initial characterization of a protein from skeletal muscle that caps the barbed ends of actin filaments. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  A. Noegel,et al.  Heterodimeric capping proteins constitute a highly conserved group of actin-binding proteins. , 1990, Developmental genetics.

[13]  A. Weeds,et al.  F-actin capping proteins. , 1993, Current opinion in cell biology.

[14]  S. Zigmond,et al.  Mechanisms responsible for F-actin stabilization after lysis of polymorphonuclear leukocytes , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  T. Stossel,et al.  From signal to pseudopod. How cells control cytoplasmic actin assembly. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  T. Stossel,et al.  Gelsolin-actin interaction and actin polymerization in human neutrophils , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Kinetic analysis of F-actin depolymerization in polymorphonuclear leukocyte lysates indicates that chemoattractant stimulation increases actin filament number without altering the filament length distribution , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  F. Southwick,et al.  Rabbit alveolar macrophages contain a Ca2+-sensitive, 41,000-dalton protein which reversibly blocks the "barbed" ends of actin filaments but does not sever them. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  A. Weber,et al.  Kinetics of the interaction of a 41-kilodalton macrophage capping protein with actin: promotion of nucleation during prolongation of the lag period. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[20]  J. Condeelis,et al.  Identification of actin nucleation activity and polymerization inhibitor in ameboid cells: their regulation by chemotactic stimulation , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  Jonathan A. Cooper,et al.  Effects of null mutations and overexpression of capping protein on morphogenesis, actin distribution and polarized secretion in yeast , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  J. Condeelis,et al.  Purification and characterization of aginactin, a newly identified agonist-regulated actin-capping protein from Dictyostelium amoebae. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  S. Zigmond,et al.  Chemoattractant-stimulated polymorphonuclear leukocytes contain two populations of actin filaments that differ in their spatial distributions and relative stabilities , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.