Accessing Cultural Artifacts through Digital Companions: The Effects on Children's Engagement

This paper presents a study that explores how the introduction of a digital companion agent for a museum exploration game changes children's engagement with the presented artworks. To this end, a mobile application was developed featuring a monster agent that has eaten the artworks, which the children had now to find in the museum. Results show that in comparison to the paper-based version of the exploration game, children engaged in more interactions with the actual cultural artifacts and showed a significantly higher retention rate for details of the involved artworks.

[1]  Kelvin Sung,et al.  Mobile Applications and Museum Visitation , 2012, Computer.

[2]  Despina Michael,et al.  Comparative Study of Interactive Systems in a Museum , 2010, EuroMed.

[3]  Anton Leuski,et al.  Ada and Grace: Toward Realistic and Engaging Virtual Museum Guides , 2010, IVA.

[4]  Allan Fowler,et al.  Measuring learning and fun in video games for young children: a proposed method , 2013, IDC.

[5]  Tiffany Barnes,et al.  Creation of a game-based digital layer for increased museum engagement among digital natives , 2012, 2012 Second International Workshop on Games and Software Engineering: Realizing User Engagement with Game Engineering Techniques (GAS).

[6]  Patrick Gebhard,et al.  On-Site Evaluation of the Interactive COHIBIT Museum Exhibit , 2009, IVA.

[7]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Kurio: a museum guide for families , 2009, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[8]  Connie Svabo,et al.  The tourist gaze and “Family Treasure Trails” in museums , 2014 .

[9]  Yan Peng Lim,et al.  Children, engagement and enjoyment in digital narrative , 2010 .

[10]  Radoslaw Niewiadomski,et al.  Warmth, Competence, Believability and Virtual Agents , 2010, IVA.

[11]  Sophie Jörg,et al.  Investigating the role of body shape on the perception of emotion , 2009, TAP.

[12]  J. Read,et al.  Endurability, Engagement and Expectations: Measuring Children’s Fun , 2002 .

[13]  Betsy van Dijk,et al.  Measuring enjoyment of an interactive museum experience , 2012, ICMI '12.

[14]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Validating the Fun Toolkit: an instrument for measuring children’s opinions of technology , 2008, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[15]  Constance Steinkuehler,et al.  Mystery at the museum: a collaborative game for museum education , 2005, CSCL.

[16]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  A Second Chance to Make a First Impression? How Appearance and Nonverbal Behavior Affect Perceived Warmth and Competence of Virtual Agents over Time , 2012, IVA.

[17]  Michael Neff,et al.  Evaluating the Effect of Gesture and Language on Personality Perception in Conversational Agents , 2010, IVA.

[18]  C. B. Madsen,et al.  Aspects of what makes or breaks a museum AR experience , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities (ISMAR-AMH).

[19]  Anton Leuski,et al.  Ada and Grace: Direct Interaction with Museum Visitors , 2012, IVA.

[20]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  A Conversational Agent as Museum Guide - Design and Evaluation of a Real-World Application , 2005, IVA.

[21]  Wolfgang Wahlster,et al.  Ambient Intelligence in Edutainment: Tangible Interaction with Life-Like Exhibit Guides , 2005, INTETAIN.

[22]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[23]  Nikoleta Yiannoutsou,et al.  "Playing with" museum exhibits: designing educational games mediated by mobile technology , 2009, IDC.

[24]  Magnus Haake,et al.  A Look at the Roles of Look & Roles in Embodied Pedagogical Agents - A User Preference Perspective , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[25]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  “Theory of companions” What can theoretical models contribute to applications and understanding of human-robot interaction? , 2011 .

[26]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  The Uncanny Valley [From the Field] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[27]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Evaluating the effects of behavioral realism in embodied agents , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  Hilary Johnson,et al.  What Do Children Favor as Embodied Pedagogical Agents? , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[29]  Magy Seif El-Nasr,et al.  Exploring Non-verbal Behavior Models for Believable Characters , 2008, ICIDS.

[30]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Tinker: a relational agent museum guide , 2012, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[31]  Gavin Sim,et al.  Investigating children's opinions of games: Fun Toolkit vs. This or That , 2012, IDC '12.

[32]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  "Do Not Touch the Paintings!" The Benefits of Interactivity on Learning and Future Visits in a Museum , 2012, ICEC.

[33]  Stuart MacFarlane,et al.  Using the fun toolkit and other survey methods to gather opinions in child computer interaction , 2006, IDC '06.

[34]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[35]  Brett Stevens,et al.  Emotional body language displayed by artificial agents , 2012, TIIS.