JPEG2000 2D and 3D reversible compressions of thin-section chest CT images: improving compressibility by increasing data redundancy outside the body region.

PURPOSE To propose a preprocessing technique that increases the compressibility in reversible compressions of thin-section chest computed tomographic (CT) images and to measure the increase in compression ratio (CR) in Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) compressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study had institutional review board approval, with waiver of informed patient consent. A preprocessing technique that automatically segments pixels outside the body region and replaces their values with a constant value to maximize data redundancy was developed. One hundred CT studies (50 standard-radiation dose and 50 low-radiation dose studies) were preprocessed by using the technique and then reversibly compressed by using the JPEG2000 2D and 3D compression methods. The CRs (defined as the original data size divided by the compressed data size) with and those without use of the preprocessing technique were compared by using paired t tests. The percentage increase in the CR was measured. RESULTS The CR increased significantly (without vs with preprocessing) in JPEG2000 2D (mean CR, 2.40 vs 3.80) and 3D (mean CR, 2.61 vs 3.99) compressions for the standard-dose studies and in JPEG2000 2D (mean CR, 2.38 vs 3.36) and 3D (mean CR, 2.54 vs 3.55) compressions for the low-dose studies (P < .001 for all). The mean percentage increases in CR with preprocessing were 58.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53.1%, 63.4%) and 52.4% (95% CI: 47.5%, 57.2%) in JPEG2000 2D and 3D compressions, respectively, for the standard-dose studies and 41.1% (95% CI: 38.8%, 43.4%) and 39.4% (95% CI: 37.4%, 41.7%) in JPEG2000 2D and 3D compressions, respectively, for the low-dose studies. CONCLUSION The described preprocessing technique considerably increases CRs for reversible compressions of thin-section chest CT studies.

[1]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technological and psychophysical considerations for digital mammographic displays. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  F. Yin,et al.  Oncologic image compression using both wavelet and masking techniques. , 1997, Medical physics.

[3]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  April Khademi,et al.  Pan-Canadian Evaluation of Irreversible Compression Ratios (“Lossy” Compression) for Development of National Guidelines , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[6]  S Sone,et al.  Effects of JPEG and wavelet compression of spiral low-dose ct images on detection of small lung cancers. , 2001, Acta radiologica.

[7]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[9]  Sang Tae Kim,et al.  Managing the CT Data Explosion: Initial Experiences of Archiving Volumetric Datasets in a Mini-PACS , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Thomas Richter,et al.  JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images. , 2009, Medical physics.

[12]  Heung-Sik Kang,et al.  Regional difference in compression artifacts in low-dose chest CT images: effects of mathematical and perceptual factors. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: effect on lung nodule detection. , 2003, Radiology.

[14]  A. Çuhadar,et al.  Region of Interest Image Coding for Digital Mammography , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[15]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  Lossy to lossless object-based coding of 3-D MRI data , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Pablo G. Tahoces,et al.  Image compression: Maxshift ROI encoding options in JPEG2000 , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[17]  Heung-Sik Kang,et al.  Objective index of image fidelity for JPEG2000 compressed body CT images. , 2009, Medical physics.

[18]  R. Newcombe Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  I. Maglogiannis,et al.  Region of Interest Coding Techniques for Medical Image Compression , 2007, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[20]  Zixiang Xiong,et al.  Cascaded differential and wavelet compression of chromosome images , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[22]  Pamela C. Cosman,et al.  Medical image compression with lossless regions of interest , 1997, Signal Process..

[23]  William A. Pearlman,et al.  Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  B. Girod,et al.  Medical image compression based on region of interest, with application to colon CT images , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[25]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Regional variance of visually lossless threshold in compressed chest CT images: lung versus mediastinum and chest wall. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[26]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Definition of compression ratio: difference between two commercial JPEG2000 program libraries. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.