Time budgets of Waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus) of different age, sex and social status

Daytime budgets of waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus) of different age, sex, and social Status were measured at Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya. Adult and subadult females spent more time feeding than adult and subadult males. Inside territories, females spent more time feeding than outside of territories. Time spent for agonistic behaviour was highest in young males. Satellite males spent less time for sexual behaviour than territory holders, but more time than bachelor males. Territory holders and satellite males spent the same amounts of time feeding - much more than bachelor males. Because the amount of forage ingested by ruminants is positively correlated with forage quality, this indicates that bachelor males were relegated to nutritionally inferior areas. Time budgets of males and females, site preferences of females, and faecal crude protein content of animals feeding at different sites (Tomlinson 1979) all suggest that territories are high quality feeding areas and that the social System of waterbuck is a resource defence polygyny. Sex differences in time spent feeding at the same site probably reflect a fundamental difference in the behavioural programming of males and females: females of polygynous species are more likely to be "energy maximisers" than males. Recent evidence points to differences in levels of sexual hormones as a proximate cause of sex differences not only of sexual and agonistic behaviour but also of maintenance behaviour.

[1]  V. Geist On the Relationship of Social Evolution and Ecology in Ungulates , 1974 .

[2]  R. Hofmann,et al.  The Ruminant Stomach , 1975 .

[3]  S. Emlen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. , 1977, Science.

[4]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[5]  K. Harker,et al.  The nutritive value of grasses grown in Uganda when fed to zebu cattle I. The relation between the percentage of crude protein and other nutrients , 1963, Journal of Agricultural Sciences.

[6]  R. L. Cowan,et al.  Dry Matter and Energy Intake in Relation to Digestibility in White-Tailed Deer , 1973 .

[7]  S. G. Hoffman Sex‐Related Foraging Behavior in Sequentially Hermaphroditic Hogfishes (Bodianus Spp.) , 1983 .

[8]  D. Rollinson,et al.  Studies on the habits of Zebu cattle IV. Errors associated with recording technique , 1956, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[9]  N. Owen‐Smith Spatial and temporal components of the mating systems of kudu bulls and red deer stags , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  D. Rollinson,et al.  Studies on the habits of Zebu cattle I. Preliminary observations on grazing habits , 1954, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[11]  P. Wirtz,et al.  Sex differences and seasonal variation in habitat choice in a high density population of waterbuck, kobus ellipsiprymnus (Bovidae) , 1988 .

[12]  A. Sinclair The Resource Limitation of Trophic Levels in Tropical Grassland Ecosystems , 1975 .

[13]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[14]  T. Schoener Theory of Feeding Strategies , 1971 .

[15]  C. Spinage A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF THE DAILY ACTIVITY OF THE UGANDA DEFASSA WATERBUCK , 1968 .

[16]  T. Haltenorth,et al.  Säugetiere Afrikas und Madagaskars , 1977 .

[17]  D. Minson,et al.  The relationship between voluntary intake and mean apparent retention time in the rumen , 1972 .

[18]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes , 1992 .

[19]  K. L. Blaxter,et al.  The energy metabolism of ruminants. , 1962 .

[20]  J. Dorst,et al.  A field guide to the larger mammals of Africa , 1969 .