Robust Optimization with Multiple Ranges: Theory and Application to Pharmaceutical Project Selection

We present a robust optimization approach when the uncertainty in objective coefficients is described using multiple ranges for each coefficient. This setting arises when the value of the uncertain coefficients, such as cash flows, depends on an underlying random variable, such as the effectiveness of a new drug. Traditional robust optimization with a single range per coefficient would require very large ranges in this case and lead to overly conservative results. In our approach, the decision-maker limits the number of coefficients that fall within each range; he can also limit the number of coefficients that deviate from their nominal value in a given range. This is particularly useful for the manager of a pharmaceutical company who aims at constructing a portfolio of R&D projects, or drugs to be developed and tested for commercialization. Modeling multiple ranges requires the use of binary variables in the uncertainty set. We show how to develop tractable reformulations using a concept called total unimodularity and apply our approach to a R&D project selection problem when cash flows are uncertain. Furthermore, we develop a robust ranking heuristic, where the manager ranks the projects according to densities, while incorporating the budgets of uncertainty but without requiring any optimization procedure, to help the manager gain insights into the solution.

[1]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  Robust discrete optimization and network flows , 2003, Math. Program..

[2]  S. Gass,et al.  Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science , 1997 .

[3]  Stephanie Boehm Research And Development Project Selection , 2016 .

[4]  Constantine Caramanis,et al.  Finite Adaptability in Multistage Linear Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Ruken Düzgün,et al.  Robust optimization with multiple ranges and chance constraints , 2012 .

[6]  L El Ghaoui,et al.  ROBUST SOLUTIONS TO LEAST-SQUARE PROBLEMS TO UNCERTAIN DATA MATRICES , 1997 .

[7]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  The Price of Robustness , 2004, Oper. Res..

[8]  Alexander J. Triantis,et al.  Dynamic R&D Investment Policies , 1999 .

[9]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs , 1999, Oper. Res. Lett..

[10]  Constantine Caramanis,et al.  Theory and Applications of Robust Optimization , 2010, SIAM Rev..

[11]  Hans Kellerer,et al.  Knapsack problems , 2004 .

[12]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: A DEA based methodology , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Jean-Philippe Vial,et al.  Robust Optimization , 2021, ICORES.

[14]  Cécile Murat,et al.  Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Laurence A. Wolsey,et al.  Integer and Combinatorial Optimization , 1988 .

[16]  Allen L. Soyster,et al.  Technical Note - Convex Programming with Set-Inclusive Constraints and Applications to Inexact Linear Programming , 1973, Oper. Res..

[17]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  Robust linear optimization under general norms , 2004, Oper. Res. Lett..

[18]  A. Ben-Tal,et al.  Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs , 2004, Math. Program..

[19]  James R. Freeland,et al.  Recent Advances in R&D Benefit Measurement and Project Selection Methods : Management Science , 1975 .

[20]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Robust Convex Optimization , 1998, Math. Oper. Res..