Cognitive and Practice-based Theories of Organizational Knowledge and Learning: Incompatible or Complementary?

Cognitive and practice-based approaches to organizational knowledge and learning are typically portrayed as incommensurable, with the result that there has been little positive dialogue between the two traditions. This article argues that the incompatibility of the two sets of approaches has been overstated and that there is actually much that each can learn from the other. Cognitive approaches, which have often been accused of offering an effectively individualized, static and representationalist understanding of organizational knowledge, can benefi t from taking on board the practicebased view of knowledge as historically, culturally and socially situated. However, the article also suggests that practice-based theories would do well to draw insights from cognitive approaches, particularly regarding the role of cognitive frameworks or schemas in guiding knowledge processes. To provide an example of how cognitive and practicebased approaches can be integrated, the latter part of the article offers an empirical illustration of how a team of consulting engineers represent and perform alternative schemas of project work through their day-to-day practices.

[1]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[2]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? , 2007 .

[3]  Stephen Fox.  ‘Inquiries of Every Imaginable Kind’: Ethnomethodology, Practical Action and the New Socially Situated Learning Theory , 2006 .

[4]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning , 2006 .

[5]  Peter J. Sher,et al.  Information Technology as a Facilitator of Enhancing Dynamic Capability through Knowledge Management , 2020 .

[6]  Janice Thomas,et al.  Deconstructing project management: a gender analysis of project management guidelines , 2003 .

[7]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach , 2003 .

[8]  Dvora Yanow,et al.  Knowing in Organizations , 2003 .

[9]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Learning the Trade: A Culture of Safety in Practice , 2002 .

[12]  Gerard P. Hodgkinson,et al.  Comparing Managers' Mental Models of Competition: Why Self-report Measures of Belief Similarity Won't Do , 2002 .

[13]  Gerry Johnson,et al.  On Trees and Triviality Traps: Locating the Debate on the Contribution of Cognitive Mapping to Organizational Research , 2002 .

[14]  S. Gherardi.  From Organizational Learning to Practice-Based Knowing , 2001 .

[15]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[16]  Janice Langan-Fox,et al.  Team Mental Models: Techniques, Methods, and Analytic Approaches , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Organizing Alignment: A Case of Bridge-Building , 2000 .

[18]  S. Gherardi.  Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations , 2000 .

[19]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring Team Knowledge , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[21]  Davide Nicolini.  Comparing Methods for Mapping Organizational Cognition , 1999 .

[22]  C. Gore,et al.  Knowledge management: The way forward , 1999 .

[23]  P. Callero.  :Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology , 1999 .

[24]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[25]  A. Strati.  MIS)UNDERSTANDING COGNITION IN ORGANIZATION STUDIES , 1998 .

[26]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[27]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[28]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[29]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Distributed Cognition in an Airline Cockpit , 1996 .

[30]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  S. D. N. Cook,et al.  Culture and Organizational Learning , 1993 .

[32]  Dorla A. Evans,et al.  Emergence of Organizational Attributions: The Role of a Shared Cognitive Schema , 1993 .

[33]  C. Eden.  ON THE NATURE OF COGNITIVE MAPS , 1992 .

[34]  Michel Audet,et al.  MAPPING OF AN IDIOSYNCRATIC SCHEMA , 1992 .

[35]  R. Curtis.  The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life , 1992 .

[36]  Tim Smithin,et al.  Mapping Strategic Thought , 1991 .

[37]  H. Thomas,et al.  Taxonomic Mental Models in Competitor Definition , 1990 .

[38]  W. Sewell.  A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  J. Greeno.  A perspective on thinking. , 1989 .

[40]  T. Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1987 .

[41]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[42]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  The appeal of parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[43]  Rex C. Mitchell.  Team Building by Disclosure of Internal Frames of Reference , 1986 .

[44]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[45]  A. Cicourel,et al.  The Role of Cognitive-Linguistic Concepts in Understanding Everyday Social Interactions , 1981 .

[46]  D. Smith.  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature , 1981 .

[47]  K. Weick,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2d ed. , 1980 .

[48]  A. Hochschild.  Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  M. Bloor.  The Structures of the Life-World , 1975 .

[50]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[51]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[52]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[53]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[54]  Mustafa Emirbayer.  What Is Agency ? ' , 2008 .

[55]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Making Projects Critical , 2006 .

[56]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Are projects real? The PMBOK and the legitimation of project management knowledge , 2006 .

[57]  Vincent Descombes,et al.  The Mind's Provisions: A Critique of Cognitivism , 2001 .

[58]  J. Greeno.  THE SITUATIVITY OF KNOWING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH , 1998 .

[59]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Cognitivism in Organization Studies , 1997 .

[60]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Situated Action: A Symbolic Interpretation , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[61]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[62]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[63]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[64]  B. Barnes,et al.  On Authority and Its Relationship to Power in Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge?. , 1986 .

[65]  S. Scribner.  Studying working intelligence. , 1984 .

[66]  D. Rumelhart.  Schemata and the cognitive system. , 1984 .

[67]  Gavin J. Wright.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[68]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[69]  R. Abelson.  Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. , 1976 .

[70]  H. B. Pepinsky.  Cognitive sociology: Language and meaning in social interaction. , 1975 .

[71]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[72]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.