How trust can drive forward the user acceptance to the technology? In-vehicle technology for autonomous vehicle

Abstract The autonomous vehicle innovation has a potential effect on traffic and it’s a widespread issue in the academic municipal. Based on its feature, autonomous vehicle is expected to improve traffic flow, reduce accidents, reduce social exclusion and improve the utility of time on travel. It is increasingly accepted that the next step to the evolution of human transportation is the replacement of human as the driver by the Artificial-intelligence-capable machine. Regardless, the challenges remain especially in convincing the consumers to switch to autonomous cars despite the apparent benefits. In the past, papers highlighted individual trust toward machine as the key point to encourage acceptance of autonomous cars. This paper seeks to highlight the ethical implications of the autonomous technology and how it is related to the user acceptance of the technology. This paper reviewed recent studies on the ethical implications of the autonomous vehicle and the user acceptance of the technology. A systematic review of papers from the literature was done using Scopus, ISI and Web of Science. The results of the review have shown that the level of trust, which may vary on the sociodemographic profile of the users, has been studied as one of the factors for user acceptance. Many researchers also highlight ethical implication as an important aspect of autonomous technology that needs to be tended to. The researcher proposes that ethical implication can be an important element of user trust toward autonomous technology. Hence, there is a need to embed ethical implication as a construct for user trust leading to user acceptance model in future studies. In the line of this research review researcher was addressed the following comprehensive groups: examination of autonomous vehicle topographies and flexibility prototypes, consequences for street traffic and connectivity to substructure (specifically in the urban areas with the medium and low density), communal attitudes and apprehensions, transportable behaviour and plea, possible business models, and strategy implications. Lastly, the main objective of this research article is to recognise critical problems for the growth of an effort cluster investigation to comprehend attitudes of possible manipulators of AVs and to highpoint autonomous vehicle growth issues for Malaysian lawful agencies.

[1]  Pandian Vasant,et al.  A comprehensive review on theoretical framework‐based electric vehicle consumer adoption research , 2017 .

[2]  Sungjun Park,et al.  Technology Acceptance Modeling based on User Experience for Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .

[3]  D. Howard,et al.  Delivering rhFGF‐18 via a bilayer collagen membrane to enhance microfracture treatment of chondral defects in a large animal model , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  Are Consumers Willing to Pay to Let Cars Drive for Them? Analyzing Response to Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .

[5]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Amran Rasli,et al.  A new era of sustainable transport: An experimental examination on forecasting adoption behavior of EVs among Malaysian consumer , 2017 .

[7]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Behavioural impacts of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems–an overview , 2019, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[8]  Philip Koopman,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Safety: An Interdisciplinary Challenge , 2017, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[9]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios , 2014 .

[10]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[11]  Sophia Duffy,et al.  Sit, Stay, Drive: The Future of Autonomous Car Liability , 2013 .

[12]  Shahrina Md Nordin,et al.  Adoption of PHEV/EV in Malaysia: A critical review on predicting consumer behaviour , 2017 .

[13]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age , 2018 .

[14]  Yong Gu Ji,et al.  Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[16]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  An International Crowdsourcing Study into People's Statements on Fully Automated Driving , 2015 .

[18]  Riender Happee,et al.  Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .

[19]  M. König,et al.  Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car , 2017 .

[20]  Ragunathan Rajkumar,et al.  Towards dependable autonomous driving vehicles: a system-level approach , 2013, SIGBED.

[21]  William Payre,et al.  Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability , 2014 .

[22]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Technology: How to Best Realize Its Social Benefits , 2014 .

[23]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers , 2014 .

[24]  Patrick Lin Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars , 2016 .

[25]  Don MacKenzie,et al.  Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles , 2016 .

[26]  Springer India-New Delhi,et al.  Automotive Revolution & Perspective Towards 2030 , 2016 .

[27]  Barbara Lenz,et al.  Automated Driving , 2014 .

[28]  Dirk Langer,et al.  Up to the limits: Autonomous Audi TTS , 2012, 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[29]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  A linear programming formulation for autonomous intersection control within a dynamic traffic assignment and connected vehicle environment , 2015 .

[30]  Shahrina Md Nordin,et al.  Barriers Towards Widespread Adoption of V2G Technology in Smart Grid Environment: From Laboratories to Commercialization , 2018 .

[31]  F. Mannering,et al.  Implementing technology to improve public highway performance: A leapfrog technology from the private sector is going to be necessary , 2014 .

[32]  Noah J. Goodall,et al.  Machine Ethics and Automated Vehicles , 2020, ArXiv.

[33]  L. D. Monache,et al.  An analog ensemble for short-term probabilistic solar power forecast , 2015 .

[34]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Not fearless, but self-enhanced: The effects of anxiety on the willingness to use autonomous cars depend on individual levels of self-enhancement , 2017 .

[35]  L. Passfield,et al.  Motivation Mediates the Perfectionism-Burnout Relationship: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study With Junior Athletes. , 2016, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[36]  Anthony Perl,et al.  Shared Autonomous Vehicles: Catalyst of New Mobility for the Last Mile? , 2016 .

[37]  Erik Eckermann,et al.  World History of the Automobile , 2001 .

[38]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  Pedestrians, Autonomous Vehicles, and Cities , 2016 .

[39]  Ryan Calo,et al.  Legal Aspects of Autonomous Driving , 2010 .

[40]  Natasha Merat,et al.  What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems , 2017 .

[42]  Noah J. Goodall,et al.  Ethical Decision Making during Automated Vehicle Crashes , 2014, ArXiv.

[43]  Nadia Adnan,et al.  Adoption of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle among Malaysian Consumers , 2016 .

[44]  Corey D. Harper,et al.  Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions , 2016 .

[45]  Stuart M. Speedie,et al.  Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[46]  Lesley Strawderman,et al.  Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[47]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Forecasting Americans' Long-Term Adoption of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Technologies , 2016 .

[48]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas , 2018 .