Failure of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws in the Osteoporotic Spine

The treatment of patients with osteoporosis and spinal abnormalities that require surgical intervention is difficult because of the challenge of achieving fixation in osteoporotic bone. As the population ages, this challenge is becoming a common problem in the field of spinal surgery. Although numerous publications exist about the biomechanical benefits of various fixation devices and techniques, no standard of care has emerged that offers a clear method for accomplishing spinal stabilization in such patients. This case presents the failure mode of cement-augmented pedicle screws in a patient with severe osteoporosis, a description of the methods used to attain fixation and spinal stability during the revision surgery, and the outcome achieved for the patient 1 year after surgery. An 82-year-old female with a T9 burst fracture and a history of osteoporosis underwent minimally invasive instrumentation from T5 to T12, fusion from T7 to T11, and decompression from T8 to T10. Four weeks after surgery, the patient returned to the hospital because of back pain. Imaging studies showed that the pedicle screws at T11 and T12, which were augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), had pulled out of the vertebral bodies. The pedicle screws failed by disengaging from the PMMA and displacing posteriorly and inferiorly. The PMMA did not appear to move during this process. A revision surgery was performed, in which the posterior construct was extended caudally and cephalad, the pedicle screws were augmented with PMMA, and a titanium hook and woven polyester band were used to increase the points of fixation. At 1-year follow-up after revision, our patient showed radiographic evidence of fusion, and the construct continued to maintain stability in the osteoporotic spine.

[1]  K. An,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[2]  S. Boriani,et al.  Fenestrated pedicle screws for cement-augmented purchase in patients with bone softening: a review of 21 cases , 2011, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[3]  A Jay Khanna,et al.  Instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: biomechanical and clinical considerations. , 2011, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  Ming-Chau Chang,et al.  Polymethylmethacrylate Augmentation of Pedicle Screw for Osteoporotic Spinal Surgery: A Novel Technique , 2008, Spine.

[5]  S. Cook,et al.  Effects of Bone Mineral Density on Pedicle Screw Fixation , 1994, Spine.

[6]  S. Cook,et al.  Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  Alessandra Conversi,et al.  Comparative Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[8]  P. Caregnato,et al.  Quantitative benefits provided by acute tissue expansion: a biomechanical study in human cadavers. , 2000, British journal of plastic surgery.

[9]  M. Richter,et al.  Revision of Cannulated and Perforated Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical Study in Human Cadavers , 2010, Spine.

[10]  J. Tan,et al.  Pedicle Screw Motion in the Osteoporotic Spine After Augmentation With Laminar Hooks, Sublaminar Wires, or Calcium Phosphate Cement: A Comparative Analysis , 2004, Spine.

[11]  D. Bednar,et al.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws augmented with particulate calcium phosphate: an experimental study. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  F. Pfeiffer,et al.  Pedicle Screw Design and Cement Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: Effects of Fenestrations and Cement Viscosity on Fixation and Extraction , 2012, Spine.

[13]  Douglas L Burton,et al.  Cement Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation Using Novel Cannulated Cement Insertion Device , 2009, Spine.

[14]  R. Ellenbogen,et al.  Revision Pedicle Screws: Bigger, Longer Shims‐What Is Best? , 1998, Spine.

[15]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Direct Medical Costs Attributable to Osteoporotic Fractures , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  S. Cook,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation and preliminary clinical experience with an expansive pedicle screw design. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[17]  R. McLain,et al.  Primary Pedicle Screw Augmentation in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae: Biomechanical Analysis of Pedicle Fixation Strength , 2007, Spine.

[18]  Kay Dickersin,et al.  Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. , 2000, NIH consensus statement.

[19]  Sabino J. D’Agostino,et al.  A biomechanical cadaveric analysis of polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.